I posted this in another thread and thought it could be worthily of discussion as the concept would indeed please many people.
Not a native English speaker, are you? That's fine, I'm just making sure. It can be very difficult to discuss esoteric subjects with one who has less than a good grasp of the language. What they say isn't always what they meant to say. Rephrasing arguments and points for clarity results in unintentional strawmen. So it's simply good to know the person to whom you're speaking has a different native tongue in which he could probably express himself quite clearly, and he should be given a break.
As to the idea of the concept of god being a pleasing concept...not for everyone, it isn't. Nor is the concept of what the world could or should be like if there actually were a god all that pleasing.
Everyone throws around here very loosely, that God is omniscient.
Question: which god do you mean? Vishnu? Oshun? Wakan-Tanka? Jehovah? YHWH?
Suffice to say that many of the gods invented by humans have been given this attribute of omniscience. It means "all-knowing." If you are speaking of one of those gods, then the reason people "throw it around very loosely" is because
that is the way those gods have always been portrayed.
Perhaps you are, instead, speaking of one of those gods who has never been attributed with omniscience? Hard to tell, though, since you don't actually say.
So, again, which god
do you mean?
Could he have not just created 2 separate universes. One for them who is knows does good and one for them who is knows does evil - for debating reasons over the whole expand of ones life.
When you are going to pile words together like that, it is customary in English to use a slash / to separate them for clarity. "Is knows does" is not a logical linguistic construction in English, and it took me several moments to parse meaning from your construction. Better to write "is/knows/does." Also, when using plural pronouns, use plural verbs. Not "them who is/knows/does," but "those who are/know/do."
Your premise is not reflected by reality. There is no such thing as a person who is, knows, and does only good or only evil. People aren't like that. If a god were going to do that, it would be known only to that god, anyway. The "completely good all the time" people on the one world do not know there is another world of people who are "completely bad all the time."
So what would be the point of this particular creation?
Imagine earth full of people who we would convict and right next to them, another earth full of people who would never be convicted. Let them who like to stab each other do it to their own kind, while them to like to not stab each other do it to their own kind.
You don't get out much into the world, do you? People don't usually stab other people because they like it. They have widely varying reasons, and rarely is that reason simple pleasure or fun. They do it for gain, or out of high emotion, or for protection. Not as a hobby or pastime.
The people on the stabbity planet probably don't exist anymore. If they lived for nothing but the pleasure and fun of killing each other, it probably didn't last very long. And now they're all dead. So, what was the point, again?
Any technology both earth's/universe invent, they keep, any information about our each world's society passed down, aswell as history just like its done now with both parties in the one universe.
Right. So the planet with the people who are good and nice and not stabbity ever...do they have any problems? Because we tend to invent technology to solve problems. And history...that's just rife with things like wars and conflicts. Nice people don't have any of those, do they?
And the bad, mean, stabbity people...they have nothing but wars, right? Always fighting, always killing...how long does this planet keep a viable population again? Do they ever get time to invent things or learn things? Or are they too busy stabbing and dying?
Could you see any downsides to this, apart from the fact noone would like to make the choice to visit an evil earth?
Um, yeah. I can see nothing but downsides. It's a ridiculous notion, worthy of a small child who has no worldly experience yet.
Hey, you asked.
