September Stundie Nominations

And the hits just keep a'coming....

tmd2_1 said:
Sabrina said:
And yet again you fail to comprehend; why am I surprised?

Let me see if I can explain this again; you point to a patent that was assigned in the 1980's that allows for a missile system to be installed in a passenger aircraft. I point out that just because a patent exists for something means exactly bupkis, because people patent IDEAS all the time that never see fruition, and request that you show evidence that show such a device was ever developed, tested, USED, and patented (because I can just about guarantee someone would have patented it; the US government holds literally thousands of patents in its own right, if I'm not mistaken, so the likelihood of someone NOT patenting this thing, whatever it is, is pretty damn low). You come back and give me exactly NO support to indicate that this device or a similar one exists, merely stating that you see no reason why it wouldn't work.

I'll tell you why it wouldn't work; because there is no EVIDENCE of it. The whole point of getting a patent is to make money of a device if it is ever created, and yet we see no evidence ten YEARS after 9/11 that missile systems are being installed in passenger aircraft in any country in the entire friggin' world.

There's a huge difference between possible and probable that I don't think you're getting here, tmd. Is it POSSIBLE that a missile system was somehow fitted on to a passenger aircraft and fired right before the aircraft hit the towers? Sure; it's POSSIBLE, the same way it's possible for monkeys to suddenly start speaking in human tongue; but probable? Um, no, for numerous reasons. A) The missile system would have been visible, either from the outside or the inside of the aircraft, and would have to have been known to the crew, the maintenance personnel, and the various airport workers prior to the ship taking off, which would have made it known to just about everyone in the world after the reporters got to them. B) There would have been eyewitness testimony stating they saw a missile contrail or something similar just before the plane impacted, and guess what; there's NONE. C) There would have been physical evidence of a missile impact on the material left over from the collapse, and there was NONE. No holes bored in support columns, no residue from the particular kind of explosive the missile would have been using, no fragments of the missile casing; NOTHING. This is why your theory is ludicrous, insane, and downright stupid; you cannot produce any EVIDENCE for it. All you have is sheer speculation, and let me tell you, there is no sane person in the world that is going to believe you if you don't give them PROOF.
Click to expand...

What your asking for is a bit ridiculous. In fact I will tell you what it is kind of like asking for. I assume you accept NIST's analysis as correct...right? Yet they haven't "produced" anything. What I mean by that is the towers haven't been rebuilt and planes flown into to them at the same speeds in the same locations. I mean that's the only way we can be sure what they say is right...would it not? But you still accept NIST's analysis right? But you know I think it's a great idea (of course I know it won't happen), we should build all 3 towers, exact replicas, put them the exact distance from each other, and fly planes into the exact location at the same or similar speeds. Of course we would need people on both sides to make sure things are fair and exactly the way things would have been on that day, you know just in case....I'd love to see the results to that especially 7, most of you would be probably be hyper ventilating, because you have a pretty good idea the results of this experiment would not be what you want to see.
Click to expand...

What... the...:boggled:
 
000063 said:
I'm not sure this can be put into the usual stundie format.
Click to expand...

DAMN YOU!!! That was SOOOO mine!!
furious-smiley.gif
 
FBI......NTSB.......they are sort of...........no...............I can't do it. They are nothing alike.

Oh.....and another Truther that want's to blow $10 billion to rebuild the towers just so we can prove to them that fire in steel skyscrapers is bad. Of course even then they would claim we used some other metal because they simply cannot conceive that steel is in anyway fallible.
 
Travis said:
FBI......NTSB.......they are sort of...........no...............I can't do it. They are nothing alike.

Oh.....and another Truther that want's to blow $10 billion to rebuild the towers just so we can prove to them that fire in steel skyscrapers is bad. Of course even then they would claim we used some other metal because they simply cannot conceive that steel is in anyway fallible.
Click to expand...


Why waste $10 billion when you can save $9,999,999,990 and just use chicken wire???
 
Travis, do you edit the quotes yourself or can I trim a bit of my quote off?

Because I see people post lots of lines at a time as if it were standard procedure. :boggled:

Cuz mine was a little long
 
I typically leave off all but the most relevant bit. Stundies work best when they are short and sweet. But if you want to highlight what you think the best part is go right ahead.
 
I'm not sure this is eligble since it is originally in norwegian. This is part of a post from a truther after someone asked why the 9/11 inside-job was so complicated, making it a very high risk for something to go wrong. Why wasn't it done much easier? I'll translate the first part of the answer:
Ever heard of placebo? Placebo is more effective the more complicated the "faith" in the so-called "medicine" given for the treatment is. To do a simple thing like planting a bomb in the building, demolish it and then blame it all on islamists with revenge by invading afghanistan and iraq, would be so easy to reveal even for fake skeptics, that no inside-job planners would implement it. Therefore you need extremely complicated and illogical happenings if the inside-job is to succeed to reach the predetermined plans after the incident in the best way possible.
Click to expand...
http://skepsis.no/forum/index.php/topic,3121.0.html

You heard it, the 9/11 inside job was so complicated because of placebo.
 
So....yeah. That makes no sense. I really fail to see how the simpler plan would be easier to see through.
 
Keoni Galt on how taking out a loan from a bank makes you a serf:
http://hawaiianlibertarian.blogspot.com/2011/09/serfing-usa.html

Serfdom is alive and well, it's just changed with the times so that you don't recognize it even as you are laboring in your serfdom.

Instead of tying it to a piece of land to lease form our landlords to maintain our own subsistence, our Lords are the cartel members of the Federal Reserve banking system and our centralized, fascist Government. Instead of simply land, our Banker Lords have the power to create "money" out of thin air. What it really means is they have the exclusive monopoly on allowing you to put yourself into debt to them, for which no matter what occupation or entrepreneurial activity you endeavor in, they charge you interest for it. Your house, your automobile, your education...if you borrowed from a Federal Reserve cartel member and are paying interest on a loan to obtain these things, you are indeed a 21st century serf.
Click to expand...

Not so ironically, Keoni Galt declared bankruptcy a couple of years ago.
 
A man who runs a conspiracy theorist "newspaper" has a garage fire. The police think it could be arson, and he believes it was the Freemasons or the Illuminati or some other CT bugaboo. He knows it was connected to a story he wrote in his newspaper. This is how he knows:
http://www.henrymakow.com/street_news_editor_targeted_by.html

Two of my psychics tell me it was because of a series of stories we are doing about the Mega-Quarry -- 2300 acres will be turned from potato growing into a hole in the ground 200 feet deep for the limestone that will be shipped to the U.S. and China. For drywall. 7,000 trucks a day, 23 tons of explosives 7 days a week.
Click to expand...
 
I've never heard of any quarry that requires 7,000 trucks a day.
 
I'd just like to buy all the posters who have the tenacity to mine the ore at DIF a figurative Coke..

..I go there once a month and almost always end up closing the browser while saying something like, "oh, shut UP!
 
For those of you who forgot why millions of people went blind on July 20, 1969.

Patrick1000 said:
We learn in this article from the professors that the ruby light actually illuminated the surface of the moon despite its very brief duration, or pulse. Pulses of light should have been seen on Armstrong's moon video toward the end of the EVA.

The personal at Lick Observatory wore glasses to protect their eyes from reflected light, and even then , only would view any reflected light through a tv monitor out of concern for their eye safety.
Click to expand...
 
matt.tansy said:
For those of you who forgot why millions of people went blind on July 20, 1969.
Click to expand...

P1K said:
The personal at Lick Observatory wore glasses to protect their eyes from reflected light, and even then , only would view any reflected light through a tv monitor out of concern for their eye safety.
Click to expand...

The insanity of this beggars belief. Does a TV monitor somehow transmit lasers at full power after a round trip of some 700,000 Km? Somehow concentrating it back into a coherent beam and emitting it through equipment like CRTs, not in any way capable of doing so?

One may as well claim that the laser guns in Star Wars may kill you if a stray shot is emitted by your TV.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom