Merged Apollo "hoax" discussion / Lick observatory laser saga

Status
Not open for further replies.
Saturation Point, Hardly!!!

Good idea. The thread has reached saturation point.

Saturation Point, Hardly!!!

Per Loss Leader's excellent recommendation, I went out and to the degree poosible, such as my schedule allows, began to research the other missions more intensively.

Witness my progress on the Borman Diarrhea Fiasco. My last post presents Borman's damning self incriminating evidence. ALL OF APOLLO IS PROVEN FRAUDULENT BASED ON BORMAN"S LUDICROUSLY PREPOSTEROUS STATEMENT.

Perhaps we need not go on, given this revelation. But I for one am interested in this masterful space ruse. Such as my commitments will allow, I will continue to "map the fraud".
 
Last edited:
Perhaps we need not go on, given this revelation. But I for one am interested in this masterful space ruse. Such as my commitments will allow, I will continue to "map the fraud".

LOL you go right ahead and map that fraud. :boggled:
 
Witness my progress on the Borman Diarrhea Fiasco. My last post presents Borman's damning self incriminating evidence. ALL OF APOLLO IS PROVEN FRAUDULENT BASED ON BORMAN"S LUDICROUSLY PREPOSTEROUS STATEMENT.


Progress? You went from saying the Borman diarrhea incident proved the Apollo missions were a hoax to saying...the Borman diarrhea incident proved the Apollo missions were a hoax.

With "progress" like that who needs stagnation?


ETA: Let me show you what "progress" is: I began this thread not knowing who you are, what your qualifications are and what you believe. I have since progressed to knowing that you are a pathological liar who doesn't have the slightest idea what you're talking about and has no respect for the people here who are attempting to educate you. I suspect quite a few others here have progressed in a similar fashion.

Now that's progress.
 
Last edited:
My last post presents Borman's damning self incriminating evidence. ALL OF APOLLO IS PROVEN FRAUDULENT BASED ON BORMAN"S LUDICROUSLY PREPOSTEROUS STATEMENT.

You really don't know how to argue a point, do you. What you certainly DON'T do is repeat, repeat, repeat the same old debunked garbage.

...and your continued repetition only demonstrates your ignorance.

Perhaps we need not go on, given this revelation.

Translation..."I've lost this argument, so lets move on..."

Once you admit your ignorance and your errors, then we can "move on". If you attempt to "move on" before doing this, it will only be further PROOF that you are an intellectual coward.
 
The gravity from the Moon facing side of Earth is 0.002025852m s2The gravity from the Moon opposite side of Earth is 0.001897225m s2
So yes. That is about right.
eta: a stunningly neglible effect on a ballistic missile though!

Thank you.
I were not sure if his calculations were right, but quite sure that 6.8% difference in lunar gravity would not make any difference near the earth. :)
 
Thank you.
I were not sure if his calculations were right, but quite sure that 6.8% difference in lunar gravity would not make any difference near the earth. :)

Less than 0.14 of a millimetre per s2
His argument makes me want to bellow with laughter.
 
Last edited:
I've been appointed chief of the new (faked) Mars landing program. Flying poo in the spacecraft is low on my list of special effects to impress the viewers.
 
I've been appointed chief of the new (faked) Mars landing program. Flying poo in the spacecraft is low on my list of special effects to impress the viewers.

You're in on it too? I've been hired to paint a large section of desert red.
 
I've been appointed chief of the new (faked) Mars landing program. Flying poo in the spacecraft is low on my list of special effects to impress the viewers.

I think you'll find the Secret Monkey Council will insist on it, though.
 
I'm still waiting to hear how you measure the curvature of spacetime by analysing a laser reflected off the moon.

Was it travelling through curved space that made Borman space sick, and would tidal forces affect where all the poop ended up?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom