Known Physics That Could Make Cold Fusion Possible?

DeathDart said:
How about fractures?
Click to expand...

There are not "intense EM waves" in the middles of fractures, either. The amount of EM energy present in a cavity or crack in metal will be approximately the blackbody radiation, i.e. a room temperature metal will have 1/40th of an eV worth of energy in any cavity mode.

A weak field can accelerate a particle to high velocities as long as it does not accelerate deuteron faster than its ability to grip it with its weak field.
Click to expand...

Not the way you think it does. Conservation of energy. A 1 eV phonon might scatter a particle up to 1 eV; after that, the phonon isn't there any more.
 
DeathDart said:
Oh it changed flavors, or color, or spin, or its a top, or a down.

Can they show us a dimensional form? Can they define the E, M, g, time, and the 3 dimensions to define a self consistent particle?

How are quarks defined?

Yes, uncertainty does raise its ugly head.

Can they describe the manifold called matter? If matter is energy, what geometry binds energy into a particle?
Click to expand...

What is the difference between a duck? Where did you study physics?
 
When I speak of known, I am speaking of generically known. The problem is determining which generic principles are potentially applicable to Cold Fusion. If we actually knew what Cold Fusion was or wasn't this exercise would be a waste of time. The old name was brainstorming. So synthesizing a solution that is probably problematic at best, is method of looking at the problem from a different viewpoint. I have used ideas that didn't work to gain an insight into something that would work.

In hurry, you are. Perfect a solution, must emerge.
 
DeathDart said:
Some of the following is just putting words together.

Creating a dynamic condensed matter environment that could capture ubiquitous neutrinos and convert them into fusion enablers or gluons.

Micro-scale particle accelerators, operating at high structural efficiencies, within micro-fractured condensed matter?

Pseudo particle creation, leading to nucleosynthesis pathways that do not generate hard radiation?

Surface phonon acceleration of particles or pseudo particles, along the surfaces of fractures.

Smearing the paths of multiple real accelerated particles, to temporarily produce the wave image of a particle.
Click to expand...
None of this is known physics that could make Cold Fusion possible. Hope this helps!! Best, fuelair


And all of it seems to just be putting random words together. Is there a really good reason for doing that? Party game perhaps?
 
Last edited:
DeathDart said:
When I speak of known, I am speaking of generically known. The problem is determining which generic principles are potentially applicable to Cold Fusion. If we actually knew what Cold Fusion was or wasn't this exercise would be a waste of time. The old name was brainstorming. So synthesizing a solution that is probably problematic at best, is method of looking at the problem from a different viewpoint. I have used ideas that didn't work to gain an insight into something that would work.

In hurry, you are. Perfect a solution, must emerge.
Click to expand...

There is no such thing as cold fusion.
 
dafydd said:
What is that supposed to mean? Do you mean that you have never heard of the Turing Test? No shame in that.
Click to expand...

I tend to answer quite obscurely, like a badly programmed computer. I don't do so good on a Turing Test.
 
I am saying that there is something in Cold Fusion, but I don't want to repeat the same experiments that go nowhere.

Lets say you had access to either microprinting technology or a silicon forge.

You could make incredibly small structures that would have the potential of acting as very efficient particle accelerators. Each portion would be optimized with the correct materials and structure. Current and voltage could be applied directly to the correct functions without needing good luck to have the right structures form accidentally during Deuteron loading.

If the maximal surface were intentionally formed to provide the highest acceleration possible, the energy output could rise dramatically.

It might be possible to squeeze out the variables and actually see the desired process.

If the artificial analog does not have the limitations of the original Palladium rods, potentially weaknesses like thermal hot spots and chemical poisoning could have been designed out. Cold Fusion (or a name more appropriate to how it actually does it) generators could make hand warmers that last for months.

Without a firm knowledge of how it works, I wouldn't want to use it in an sensitive application.

So we try to break down all the known ways that matter will fuse and then check the computer models, to see if we can create a structure that will maximize energy output through discrete channel microscale acceleration apparatus.
 
DeathDart said:
If the maximal surface were intentionally formed to provide the highest acceleration possible, the energy output could rise dramatically.
Click to expand...

I look forward to seeing the math that supports this conjecture.
 
DeathDart said:
I am saying that there is something in Cold Fusion, but I don't want to repeat the same experiments that go nowhere.

Lets say you had access to either microprinting technology or a silicon forge.

You could make incredibly small structures that would have the potential of acting as very efficient particle accelerators. Each portion would be optimized with the correct materials and structure. Current and voltage could be applied directly to the correct functions without needing good luck to have the right structures form accidentally during Deuteron loading.

If the maximal surface were intentionally formed to provide the highest acceleration possible, the energy output could rise dramatically.

It might be possible to squeeze out the variables and actually see the desired process.

If the artificial analog does not have the limitations of the original Palladium rods, potentially weaknesses like thermal hot spots and chemical poisoning could have been designed out. Cold Fusion (or a name more appropriate to how it actually does it) generators could make hand warmers that last for months.

Without a firm knowledge of how it works, I wouldn't want to use it in an sensitive application.

So we try to break down all the known ways that matter will fuse and then check the computer models, to see if we can create a structure that will maximize energy output through discrete channel microscale acceleration apparatus.
Click to expand...

We could search for leprechauns too.
 
DeathDart said:
You could make incredibly small structures that would have the potential of acting as very efficient particle accelerators.
Click to expand...

A DC field in a cavity will short out at around 1 volt per micron. A 1-volt-per-micron field from (e.g.) a laser beam requires the sort of laser you'd use to saw your accelerator in half.

So we try to break down all the known ways that matter will fuse and then check the computer models, to see if we can create a structure that will maximize energy output through discrete channel microscale acceleration apparatus.
Click to expand...

Sure. It's called a "particle accelerator". If I use the state of the art in short-distance acceleration, I can probably get over the D-Ni fusion barrier in an accelerator less than two feet long. Is that what you were looking for?

Oh, but you want an accelerator that keeps working when it's not plugged in.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom