Merged Apollo "hoax" discussion / Lick observatory laser saga

Status
Not open for further replies.
Einstein, ICBMs and Lunar Laser Ranging

The flight path of an ICBM through space-time will vary greatly depending on the moon's location in relation to that flight path. The moon will BEND TIME AND SPACE more when the ICBM flies in front of it than it will when the missile flies on the other side, sans moon. Think of the tides.

So they use the LRRRs to study this and the laser paths themselves can be studied with regard to assessing the degree and nature of space-time bending.

This is the main reason why the Apollo project existed, to study the effect of the moon on ICBM trajectories.
 
Last edited:
The Nature of Apollo

We now can say in very concise terms what Apollo was. It was an unmanned mission in which multiple LRRRs were placed on the lunar surface so that the moon's gravitational influence on ICBM flight path could be studied in great detail. The laser light itself would of course "bend" in this same space time and would serve to help elucidate how best to target ICBMs taking into account the moon's gravitational influence. Remember, because the Earth is 8,000 miles across, the distance difference on the 2 sides translates into a big difference, up to roughly 6.8% of space bending/flight path altering.

Again, to emphasize. As non militaristic as I am, I see what was done as very reasonable , and see Armstrong , now as ever so much more patriotic and courageous given what he has endured.
 
Last edited:
Patrick1000 said:
The flight path of an ICBM through space-time will vary greatly depending on the moon's location in relation to that flight path. The moon will BEND TIME AND SPACE more when the ICBM flies in front of it that it will when the missile flies on the other side, sans moon. Think of the tides.
Click to expand...

What a bunch of hogwash. What comic book did you read that in??

This is the main reason why the Apollo project existed, to study the effect of the moon on ICBM trajectories.
Click to expand...

...and the intellectual coward's crap continues...
 
Patrick1000 said:
We now can say in very concise terms what Apollo was.
Click to expand...

Who is this "we" you speak of. No one here "buys" into your garbage no matter how many times you care to repeat it.

It was an unmanned mission in which multiple LRRRs were placed on the lunar surface so that the moon's gravitational influence on ICBM flight path could be studied in great detail.
Click to expand...

Prove it.

...and see Armstrong , now as ever so much more patriotic and courageous given what he has endured.
Click to expand...

Edited by jhunter1163: 
Edited for Rule 0.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
A 6.8% difference in lunar gravity, really.
And how much would that matter when compared to earth gravity, and it's regional differences?

Do you happen to know if there are any artillery tables that include tide tables?
I mean, ICBM's are not the first case of people using ballistic calculations for hitting stuff.
 
On Tuesday, NASA will be releasing higher resolution images of 3 Apollo sites. I imagine those images will be posted here. Is it your intent to completely ignore those images?

No matter...I hope you post some outrageous "explanation" so that we may all have a good laugh at your expense.

Good times indeed. :)
 
Patrick1000 said:
When the moon is on one side of the Earth vs the other, the gravitational effects on each of the 2 sides are different. Because the earth's diameter is 8,000 miles, the gravitational field on the earth's far side, non moon side, is weaker than on the side with the moon.
Click to expand...

WOW...I've never seen such a misunderstanding of how the Moon affects the tides of the Earth.

If ignorance is "bliss" then you must be very happy.
 
I have just reread the wikki article on the Paris gun.
It mentions Coriolis force but no tide, feel free to come up with any documentation of your lunacy. (pun intended)
 
Patrick1000 said:
We now can say in very concise terms what Apollo was. It was an unmanned mission in which multiple LRRRs were placed on the lunar surface so that the moon's gravitational influence on ICBM flight path could be studied in great detail. The laser light itself would of course "bend" in this same space time and would serve to help elucidate how best to target ICBMs taking into account the moon's gravitational influence. Remember, because the Earth is 8,000 miles across, the distance difference on the 2 sides translates into a big difference, up to roughly 6.8% of space bending/flight path altering.

Again, to emphasize. As non militaristic as I am, I see what was done as very reasonable , and see Armstrong , now as ever so much more patriotic and courageous given what he has endured.
Click to expand...

Check your calculations. You missed at least one step. I'd fix your problem but I'm busy editing a video today.
 
Patrick1000 said:
The flight path of an ICBM through space-time will vary greatly depending on the moon's location in relation to that flight path. The moon will BEND TIME AND SPACE more when the ICBM flies in front of it than it will when the missile flies on the other side, sans moon. Think of the tides.

So they use the LRRRs to study this and the laser paths themselves can be studied with regard to assessing the degree and nature of space-time bending.

This is the main reason why the Apollo project existed, to study the effect of the moon on ICBM trajectories.
Click to expand...

Anyone claim this for a Stundie yet?

Looks like a sure winner....
 
Free Fall Plus the Moon

Think of it this way. As far as the planet Earth goes, astronauts in orbit, or an ICBM in semi orbit/coasting, are more or less in free fall, a la Einstein's equivalence principle. So we can effectively ignore the Earth. The moon is left to pull on things. So for objects in "free fall" with respect to the Earth, the moon will pull to a greater or lesser degree, bend space-time to a greater or lesser degree, depending on the free falling object's relative position, the object free falling with respect to the earth's position relative to the moon.

The concern of those involved in the Apollo program was to range the moon and study this lunar pull on objects in relative terrestrial free fall. Understand the moon's varying position dependent influence, and missiles could be more accurately targeted.

The laser light itself flies through the space-time being studied.
 
Last edited:
Patrick1000 said:
The concern of those involved in the Apollo program was to range the moon and study this lunar pull on objects in relative terrestrial free fall. Understand the moon's varying position dependent influence, and missiles could be more accurately targeted.
Click to expand...

Why do you continue to repeat this GARBAGE? Do you really think that by constantly repeating this junk, we'll somehow "grow tired" and agree with you?

Why don't you hold your breath until we do.
 
Patrick1000 said:
Think of it this way. As far as the planet Earth goes, astronauts in orbit, or an ICBM in semi orbit/coasting, are more or less in free fall, a la Einstein's equivalence principle. So we can effectively ignore the Earth. The moon is left to pull on things. So for objects in "free fall" with respect to the Earth, the moon will pull to a greater or lesser degree, bend space-time to a greater or lesser degree, depending on the free falling object's relative position, the object free falling with respect to the earth's position relative to the moon.

The concern of those involved in the Apollo program was to range the moon and study this lunar pull on objects in relative terrestrial free fall. Understand the moon's varying position dependent influence, and missiles could be more accurately targeted.

The laser light itself flies through the space-time being studied.
Click to expand...

Stundirific!
 
Cl1mh4224rd said:
Even if he his a doctor, with as much time as he spends here, he's clearly not practicing.
Click to expand...

That's all to the good. I'm still waiting for him to answer the question about the photos and the liars. I'm not holding my breath. Fancy not knowing how the Moon creates tides. I learned that in junior school.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom