I'm not saying it didn't hit.
I mean... you can watch it for yourself. At what point do you see debris hit WTC 7 ?
it seems u'r saying two contradictory things. Or that it got hit but no one saw it. In fact FEMA took a series of photos clearly documenting the damage to the Southeast side of the building. And it shows substantial superficial damage that resulted from the incredibly violent destruction the Twin Towers were subjected to.
At 350 feet away, WTC7 was closest to the North Tower. That is the length of a football field and yet we are being asked to imagine that gravity caused such powerful lateral energy. Look at the debris fields, at the pulverized concrete and 1100 missing bodies. Gravity drive things straight down. (and stationary supported objects push back).
Massive falling objects may squash us like bugs but it cannot remove the ability to find any sample of our dna. This is the case with a third of all people missing in the Twin Towers! Even when they dropped a 500lb bomb on zarqawi, they sent int the usual dna recovery team to confirm the kill and found it.
Look at that massive approx 30 story upper block of the south tower we can see go way outside the footprint would have (if no explosives had been used) continued to fall right into the street, instead it rights itself and magically disappears into a massive dust cloud into the path of maximum resistance. In reality it would not have 'collapsed' in the first place. Because those MASSIVE corner BOX columns were all completely intact. No plane hit them. How is it they separated? and the the whole block fell through itself??
Occam would say 'explosives' bc that is the simplest explanation. The only other explanation is that the laws of physics were altered and that is not very likely, is it?
The much smaller (& so weaker) WTC6 stood between the North Tower and WTC7 right next to the NT and took the full brunt of its explosive debris full on...and yet, miraculously, it did not lose a single vertical column! How can this be? a reasonable person might ask. The thing was hollowed like a shell but there the perimeter columns stood intact until the frame was pulled down with cables at a later date.
The mostly superficial damage to the SE face of wtc 7 (despite how bad it is) obviously cannot account for it's going into symmetrical freefall. Neither can one column failing (no 79 as per NIST).
I know just how difficult this is to believe but remember, just bc something seems unlikely doesn't mean it isn't so. We must use the available evidence. And the evidence in the WTC attacks overwhelming points to pre-planted explosives.
peace
