Richard Gage Blueprint for Truth Rebuttals on YouTube by Chris Mohr

[mrkinnies]

it fell before the rest even started to collapse, so it did sure not fall as a single block as you falsly claimed.

Oh, I'm sorry, that's right, WTC7 split in two with one side falling over sideways and the other falling straight down. Silly me.

Even NIST says the collapse ended with the building falling as a single unit. But hey, maybe they're wrong on that one too.

 

[DC]

Oh, I'm sorry, that's right, WTC7 split in two with one side falling over sideways and the other falling straight down. Silly me.

Even NIST says the collapse ended with the building falling as a single unit. But hey, maybe they're wrong on that one too.

first the penthouse collapsed and then the outer shell, how is that collapsing as a single block?

 

[NoahFence]

"even NIST said"

One of my favorite trutherisms....

They're 1/2 a second away from being accused of criminal negligence by these twits, but when you need to make a point, always go by what NIST said!

 

[sheeplesnshills]

Does the hilighted text impact on the NIST collapse model rendering it invalid ?

No, not at all, Why would you assume that? NIST showed that failure of 79 alone could cause the failure, they never insisted that 79 failing alone was essential to the building failure.

 

[sheeplesnshills]

Chapter 2 Section 2.4 Page 21 NCSTAR 1A. It's all there as clear as day.

Do I have to keep repeating this to you guys?

so post it.......its you that's asserting what they say.........

 

[sheeplesnshills]

Oh, I'm sorry, that's right, WTC7 split in two with one side falling over sideways and the other falling straight down. Silly me.

Even NIST says the collapse ended with the building falling as a single unit. But hey, maybe they're wrong on that one too.

post a link to where they say that......

 

[sheeplesnshills]

That's absolute rubbish. When you say college do you mean kindergarten?

so whats rubbish about it? pleased do tell

The building fell as a single block. There is absolutely no evidence that the south side fell first. NONE

Stop lying! It clearly did not, as the east penthouse shows that it was falling apart long before the north face fell. And how did it get under the north face in the debris pile?

 

[mrkinnies]

post a link to where they say that......

Final words of chapter 2

"The entire building above the buckled-column region then moved downward as a single unit, completing the global collapse sequence."

 

[NoahFence]

Final words of chapter 2

"The entire building above the buckled-column region then moved downward as a single unit, completing the global collapse sequence."

The 2nd stage of the collapse. The entire building did NOT move as a single unit.

 

[bill smith]

Final words of chapter 2

"The entire building above the buckled-column region then moved downward as a single unit, completing the global collapse sequence."

Checkmate.

 

[DC]

Final words of chapter 2

"The entire building above the buckled-column region then moved downward as a single unit, completing the global collapse sequence."

 

[DC]

Checkmate.

its not even Check.

 

[NoahFence]

Checkmate.

Not quite.

 

[mrkinnies]

The 2nd stage of the collapse. The entire building did NOT move as a single unit.

So why would NIST have said this?

This is one of the few bits I really agree with by NIST in NCSTAR 1A since it's easily confirmed by opening one's eyes and looking at the video evidence.

 

[NoahFence]

So why would NIST have said this?

This is one of the few bits I really agree with by NIST in NCSTAR 1A since it's easily confirmed by opening one's eyes and looking at the video evidence.

Did the Penthouse fall before the main part of the building or not?

No links. No youtube video's. Just a yes or a no.

 

[Clayton Moore]

So why would NIST have said this?

This is one of the few bits I really agree with by NIST in NCSTAR 1A since it's easily confirmed by opening one's eyes and looking at the video evidence.

Eyes Wide Shut seems to be the debunkers motto.

 

[mrkinnies]

Did the Penthouse fall before the main part of the building or not?

No links. No youtube video's. Just a yes or a no.

Yes

Now answer my question.

 

[DC]

So why would NIST have said this?

This is one of the few bits I really agree with by NIST in NCSTAR 1A since it's easily confirmed by opening one's eyes and looking at the video evidence.

buceause that is what happened after the penthouse and the floors beneath it collapsed.

 

[sheeplesnshills]

You know that guy who's doing all the new 9/11 cartoons ? He should make one of a guy huddled down in a trench with a stone wall behind him,barbed wire all around, helmet pulled down over his ears and a big 'NIST' painted on it in white letters. lol

Why? they are not under any kind of credible attack. Its like suggesting the USA should be ready for a nuclear attack by Liechtenstein.

 

[mrkinnies]

buceause that is what happened after the penthouse and the floors beneath it collapsed.

Exactly, the penthouse is seen to fall.

Further parts of the roof start to fall then, almost immediately,

the remainder of the building falls downward as a single unit.

When I mean remainder, I am referring to the vast bulk of the building of course (including the penthouse structure since it's still inside - so perhaps using the word remainder is wrong as it was the whole building which fell downward).