• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

UFOs: The Research, the Evidence

Status
Not open for further replies.
Could you please record video of satellites, insects, birds, etc. so that we can see how those look through your setup?

This is an excellent suggestion. Ezikel, will you please show us an example of how a satellite looks when photographed through your infrared camera? This will allow you to demonstrate to us what differences allow you to tell that yours are not satellites.
 
No, i dont like the energy from this forum , i wont be doing anything other than discussions

Then I'm afraid the discussion may shortly run into the sand.

You present pictures that look like satellites, we say they're satellites, you say we're confused little people. Impasse.

Where do we go from here?
 
And I see you're just confusing yourself photographing perfectly ordinary objects.

I don't see any problem recognizing they are UFO. Being UFO does not mean there is no mundane explanation, it only means the mundanity is not recognized by the observer. And in the case concerning us I am very willing to recognize that whereas I have various mundane explanation , including simple baloon carried by the wind, I can't say for sure which it is , therefore it is an UFO. Unidentified Flying Object.

Now if you want to discuss the sillyness of UFO summoning you are preachin' to the choir and that should be reserved for another thread.
 
i hear it all the time from skeptics ..... birds, bats , insects, satellites, swamp gas , balloons etc, etc. same Bologna i hear on youtube . my evidence is undebunkable .
I have yet to see anything other than empty words against my evidence ..... i provide proof and skeptics provide empty nothing .

Do you have anything with geese?
 
good luck trying to make a satellite fly so close to an airplane like in this video.


You do realize that just because they look to be close to each other doesn't necessarily mean they actually are, don't you?
 
Last edited:
Tree- yes , airplane- yes, satellite- no

good luck trying to make a satellite fly so close to an airplane like in this video.

How do you know it was "so close" to an airplane? You can't tell the altitude of these things just with your eyes. That's like me videotaping the moon and moving my finger into the frame, and saying "how did my finger get so close to the moon?"
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom