Still we have the LM on the Moon while you're lying about going to Delhi.
First of all, my point stands about using the correction factors on all of the other east coordinates.
Since you intentionally neglected to mention the reconstructed accelerometer trajectory out of sheer intellectual cowardice allow me to quote myself:In no case does it give you 23 26' 00". AND my dear friend , I am so very glad that you brought this up because it gives an excellent example of how these clowns play loose and fast with the numbers to dupe us.
So according to Matt and NASA's Mission Report, the photography determined coordinates,
If the reconstructed accelerometer position has the map corrections applied it matches the position given to Lick.
Bolding mine. This whole time you've been saying Lick was given the EXACT rendezvous radar position before Reed came in the morning, and mocked my assertion the positions did not match, saying they were close enough, and yet his position was off, if you apply the map corrections, which you're not supposed to do, by 40" of latitude and 17" of longitude, and even more off if you don't apply the map correction. Yet the reconstructed accelerometer trajectory is off by 1" and 1" (no doubt due to rounding errors when converting between a thousandth decimal place and one second of arc) and suddenly that's not close enough??? How does your ludicrously inconsistent logic not make your brain explode?once converted to the "minutes and seconds of arc" form will yield 00 41' 15" north and 23 26' 00" E once we complete the calculation with the appropriate correction factors. For the north coordinate 0.647 we have the equivalent 00 38' 49" and to that we add 2' 25" and obtain 00 41 14". Now in the east coordinate case we have 23.505, which converts to 23 30' 18. We subtract 4' 17" and obtain 23 26' 01". Indeed close, but very much not 00 41 15 and closer still but not 23 26 01. AND here is one case where EXACT coordinates do matter
Yet all the positions in Table 5-IV, including the ones available when Reed came into work, are within 5 miles of each other. So this FIDO either can't do simple spherical trigonometry or he is using artistic license. Yet another non-issue you keep regurgitating.because as we have see, the staff at Lick Observatory was given the north coordinate 00 41' 15" not 00 41' 14" and somebody told the Flight International Journalist that 00 41 15 north was in Armstrong's DSKY AND IN THIS CASE YES IT DOES NATTER THAT THE NUMBERS DO NOT MATCH EXACTLY FOR OBVIOUS REASONS, THOSE BEING , 00 41 15 IS INDDED THE EXACT COORDINATE OF TRANQUILITY BASE AND EVEN WITH ALL THIS BOGUS JIVE NASA DOESN'T SHOW WHERE THE NUMBER COMES FROM. AND THE FIDO ON DUTY EXPLICITLY STATES THAT ALL OF THESE NUMBERS IN THE MISSION REPORT , EXCEPT FOR HIS OWN OF COURSE ARE NOT WITHIN 5 MILES OF HIS CALCULATION, 0.636 NORTH AND 23.50 EAST
Still we have the LM on the Moon while you're lying about going to Delhi.
In the crab salad how much lemon juice? TBSP or just a wise squeeze of a good sized one
Check this out Matt, from the voice transcript;
Time: 14 16 34 06
CC This is Houston. Go ahead. Over.
CMP Roger. I can't see them. (COLUMBIA)
112:35:00 McCandless: Roger. We understand. This is intended to be your last P22. We don't want to use up too much fuel in this effort. Over.
Do flights from San fran to India even go through Europe?
You've been "heading out" for the past 11 hours...
I know, and I did think I was getting out of town. Still, you guys are off the hook. I need to sleep, will try to get outta' here tomorrow.
Try all you want, but unless you have a problem with missing schedules, it's really up to the airline, isn't it? What have they told you about the situation?
Airline and Flight Number please.
*Cough, cough**Ahem*
I suppose it's probably inappropriate to report pat's last post to the mods for "excessive use of uppercase."
But boy, I'm tempted.
*Cough, cough*
Just in case the "flight to India" has been "delayed" again, I have one more interesting bit of information.
The Apollo 11 Press Kit. "FOR RELEASE: SUNDAY July 6, 1969"
Hadn't bothered looking into it yet, but lo and behold! Page 85:
"The Apollo 11 Landing Sites Are:
Site 2 --
latitude 0o 42' 50" North
longitude 23o 42' 28" East"
Yes, they do. It is possible that Patrick1000/fattydash/DoctorTea/BSpassky/BFischer/mvinson/piersquared/etc. is going to India; as I mentioned before, maybe mommy and daddy are taking him for a visit. Or maybe high school is starting back up again. One can't say, and frankly the subject is too boring to think about any further.
Anyway, it's clear he's not (a) 53, (b) a doctor, (c) a scientist, (d) a published writer, (e) possessor of any engineering background whatsoever, or (f) honest, as his long history of sock-puppetry shows. The only thing that's not clear to me is (g) whether or not he's simply a troll, or - God help him - he actually believes his own self-contradictory, ever-mutating story. It is clear that (h) he has ego in inverse proportion to his competence, which I've seen before and is never a good thing.
What's interesting to me is not the content of his blather - I've transported patients with head traumas, and others who have undergone clean psychotic breaks, who make a lot more sense and can stick to the point better. It's more the way he has assiduously avoided the questions which would actually allow one to clarify his claims (such as they are), including mine here several days ago, or on apollohoax over a month ago.
I also enjoy the fun little details of how he contradicts himself - like claiming an "exact" position for a lander; when pressed for evidence, he waved his hands about a Surveyor-type craft - but since he doesn't know what he's talking about, he didn't realize that they wouldn't provide the "exact" positioning he claimed. In terms of analyzing his claims, such as they are, it's sort of like finding a paint scratch on a car that's burned up, been shoved over a cliff, and then sunk in the ocean. But it's good for a little amusement.
Oh, and one more thing: in Maryland, good crabcakes are de rigueur, but somefood snotspurists insist that bread crumbs have no place in a quality crabcake. Nonsense; you just need the right amount - enough to hold it together, though not too much, and from a good quality French bread dried in the oven. Fresh ingredients, of course, are needed, and I personally like a little cayenne to kick it up a notch, maybe a dash of Tabasco, but that's also the influence of the Cajun and Creole food I ate in Houston (mmm, Ragin' Cajun, Blue Oyster Bar, Pe-Te's...) But I digress.
Of course, you think it does, otherwise your lame brain theory would be in even deeper trouble. Footnote (c) applies to the photo position obtained from the map mentioned in footnote (a), not to any other navigation method. I posted a picture of it! Everybody can see it. Who here can see it?
Since you intentionally neglected to mention the reconstructed accelerometer trajectory out of sheer intellectual cowardice allow me to quote myself:
Yet you continue:
Bolding mine. This whole time you've been saying Lick was given the EXACT rendezvous radar position before Reed came in the morning, and mocked my assertion the positions did not match, saying they were close enough, and yet his position was off, if you apply the map corrections, which you're not supposed to do, by 40" of latitude and 17" of longitude, and even more off if you don't apply the map correction. Yet the reconstructed accelerometer trajectory is off by 1" and 1" (no doubt due to rounding errors when converting between a thousandth decimal place and one second of arc) and suddenly that's not close enough??? How does your ludicrously inconsistent logic not make your brain explode?
If you're going to apply the corrections to the rendezvous radar position you have to apply them to the reconstructed accelerometer position, too. So Mission Control reconstructed the PGNCS trajectory with the known errors and came up with a new position. Someone converted it to map coordinates and someone else passed it on to Lick. Mystery Solved!
Yet all the positions in Table 5-IV, including the ones available when Reed came into work, are within 5 miles of each other. So this FIDO either can't do simple spherical trigonometry or he is using artistic license. Yet another non-issue you keep regurgitating.
Since you will just quote the same old nonsense and ignore all this information I bid you good night. Your mom should be in soon to tuck you into bed.
Do flights from San fran to India even go through Europe?
He lies about everything. It's very obvious from certain phrases that he uses that he is much younger than he claims.