Richard Gage Blueprint for Truth Rebuttals on YouTube by Chris Mohr

Status
Not open for further replies.
Clayton Moore said:
Chris's videos don't seem to connect the effect 9/11 had on a America and the conception of 9/11 between the PNAC and the New Pearl Harbor.

why would they? he is merely refuting a lot "mistakes" (lie in less politically correct words) in Gages story.

The people making money via overseas manufacturing and the people making money from the wars have caused the timebomb.
Click to expand...

off topic (and a baseless assertion, of what I'm not quite sure)

The big money people support the thinktanks and the lobbyists that instigated the Patriot Act and Homeland Security after 9/11.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

So? (and a baseless assertion)how is that relevant to the topic?
Click to expand...
 
Marokkaan said:
Thats a great thing to hear.

Maybe its time to start beginning write a peer reviewed article(s), instead of wasting time on a forum, discussing about the subjects.
Click to expand...

Many of us have. I am working on one right now in fact.

Why would Chris Moore (an admitted layperson, with no formal training) write a peer-reviewed paper to a scientific journal?
 
triforcharity said:
Many of us have. I am working on one right now in fact.

Why would Chris Moore (an admitted layperson, with no formal training) write a peer-reviewed paper to a scientific journal?
Click to expand...

Even better truthers parade Gage around as an expert, and he has written nothing aside from powerpoint presentations & some blog entries.
 
Clayton Moore said:
Chris's videos don't seem to connect the effect 9/11 had on a America and the conception of 9/11 between the PNAC and the New Pearl Harbor.

The people making money via overseas manufacturing and the people making money from the wars have caused the timebomb.

The big money people support the thinktanks and the lobbyists that instigated the Patriot Act and Homeland Security after 9/11.
Click to expand...
Look at video 19
 
Video #18: Freefall of Building 7 Redone

Hi all,

I'm hoping to revive this thread, partly because it's taking too much time for me to check all the other threads and keep up.

You may know that David Chandler slammed my Gage Rebuttal #18 in a YouTube of his own, and he caught two errors which I have now corrected in this new version:

part 18 Building 7 freefall collapse http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2MER5PhIDt0

The old link to part 18 is disabled, this one is a better version. If it still has mistakes, let me know but I think the worst of them have been fixed.

Chandler used Jesus's "pearls before swine" quote to describe why he opposes anyone debating me. Others at AE911 Truth etc want to respond to my YouTubes. We'll see what happens.
 
grandmastershek said:
You must be referring to how people take 1 sentence out of a large document to try to justify their delusions. Its a very reoccurring theme among truthers.
Click to expand...

It's called when the people, of the influence of those footing the bill for people as influential as the signers of the document, speak people are listening.

Besides, all the bullet items of the document came to pass.
 
If anyone has a correction to make on the new video 18, let me know. I will add it to the Decription part. Chris
 
chrismohr said:
Hi all,

I'm hoping to revive this thread, partly because it's taking too much time for me to check all the other threads and keep up.

You may know that David Chandler slammed my Gage Rebuttal #18 in a YouTube of his own, and he caught two errors which I have now corrected in this new version:

part 18 Building 7 freefall collapse http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2MER5PhIDt0

The old link to part 18 is disabled, this one is a better version. If it still has mistakes, let me know but I think the worst of them have been fixed.

Chandler used Jesus's "pearls before swine" quote to describe why he opposes anyone debating me. Others at AE911 Truth etc want to respond to my YouTubes. We'll see what happens.
Click to expand...


Thanks for doing what the truthers cannot. Admit your errors and correct your work in a timely manner.

The ability to do so is a sign of strength, not weakness.
 
mrkinnies said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZEvA8BCoBw&feature=player_embedded#!

Do I believe a layman like Chris Mohr or the experts in this video? I go with the latter.
Click to expand...


You mean the "experts" that are at odds with just about every actual expert in the field of structural engineering? The "experts" that won't publish an article in a peer-reviewed publication, in fact, haven't even tried? The "experts" that only exists as an argument to false authority? Those "experts"?
 
Oystein said:
You link to a video narrated by Ed Asner.
Can you explain to us why Ed Asner is more of an expert than Chris Mohr?

Also, would you care to enlighten us how the people at NIST fare in comparison to those at AE911T in terms of expertise?

Thanks.
Click to expand...


You can't even have watched this video throughout, it's 15 minutes long and yet you post 5 mins after me.

You debunkers really are amazing how you manage to alter time and truth.
 
Last edited:
TheRedWorm said:
You mean the "experts" that are at odds with just about every actual expert in the field of structural engineering? The "experts" that won't publish an article in a peer-reviewed publication, in fact, haven't even tried? The "experts" that only exists as an argument to false authority? Those "experts"?
Click to expand...


Another who posts without even watching the video.
 
Last edited:
mrkinnies said:
You can't even have watched this video throughout, it's 15 minutes long and yet you post 5 mins after me.

You debunkers really are amazing how you manage to alter time and truth.
Click to expand...


The truth movement has hardly changed their arguments since 2006. Why is spending another 15 minutes on their claims even necessary?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom