Split Thread What does "MIHOP" mean?

Would someone please close this stupid thread?!?

All it is now (and has been for weeks) is F2's constant use of the word "incorrect" in places where people aren't actually incorrect. And it's a stage for his belittling of anybody not in agreement with his one-sided view. For the love of God and everything good in this world, just end it.
 
beachnut said:
"Peak Oil MIHOP" - 170
Click to expand...
And ["Peak oil" MIHOP] brings back 184000 :rolleyes:

More than zero then...
ozeco41 said:
Remember in logic of argument that exclusive or global claims about the real world are almost always false. It only needs one example to prove the falsity of a global claim. :rolleyes: :D
Click to expand...


There is one who
Click to expand...
Incorrect, as you just proved yourself.

Off topic and addressing the arguer portions snipped.
 
Last edited:
This whole thread is off-topic and stupid. It's a blazingly bright sample of writing massive tomes without actually saying anything.

Lets move on from this. Start another thread about something you know about.
 
Last edited:
NoahFence said:
This whole thread is off-topic and stupid.
Click to expand...
Your OP post (and those following it) in this split thread, asserting a singular meaning to "what does MIHOP mean" has been proven wrong. I agree that large sections of this thread are off topic, as they address "what femr2 thinks" or similar, not rational discussion of "what does MIHOP mean". The mods, however, disagree.

Lets move on from this.
Click to expand...
Go ahead. Just ignore the thread. No-one is forcing you to participate.

Or if you can't stop posting (and assuming you now accept that "what does MIHOP mean" has many answers, many "who", "what" and "how" scenarios depending upon who you were talking to and when), then you could make a stand and support or even replace my presence in the thread by illustrating to those silly folk who still assert a singular meaning how and why they are wrong.

Start another thread about something you know about.
Click to expand...
:rolleyes: ...
femr2 said:
M.I.H.O.P. is an acronym for:

Made It Happen On Purpose

As discussed a few years ago on an external site...


[MIHOP/LIHOP] can mean almost anything depending on what the user wants them to mean when left unqualified, and they can just as easily be misunderstood by the intended audience when this happens.

Without clarification, the terms are like empty, unfilled glasses; containers without meaningful content.

When these labels are followed by specific explanations and analysis they are somewhat more useful, but without clarification they are dangerously open-ended:

  • Who made it happen?
  • What happened?
  • How did it happen?
  • Why did it happen?
  • Why is the official story wrong?
  • Which parts of the official story are wrong?
  • What parts are true?
  • And most importantly, how can you prove it?

These are all questions that MIHOP and LIHOP do not answer when they are not followed with explanation or precise definition;
on their own these terms are virtually meaningless.


The "who", "what" and "how" are subjective and undefined unless stated.

Many differently scoped M.I.H.O.P. "who"'s have been discussed over the years, including, but not limited to...

  • Cheney-Bush MIHOP
  • Peak Oil MIHOP
  • Mossad MIHOP
  • Zionist MIHOP
  • Jewish MIHOP
  • New World Order MIHOP
  • Rogue Network MIHOP
  • Space Aliens MIHOP
  • Al Qaeda MIHOP
  • BP MIHOP

Note the repeated usage of a "who" prefix to the acronym.

Similarly, there are a number of differing "what"'s including, but not limited to...

  • Destruction of WTC 1 & 2
  • Destruction of WTC 1, 2 & 7
  • Destruction of WTC 7
  • Destruction of a segment of the Pentagon
  • Destruction of Flight 93

Anyone using the acronym may be talking about any of the above, singularly or in combination.

The "how" list is rather longer, comprising each and every "theory" about how any of the various "who" and "what" would be accomplished.


Many using the acronym assume a USG (US Government) prefix as the "who", however, as can be seen from the list above, that is far from the only discussed "who".

It should also be highlighted that even those assuming a particular "who" are still using the term with undefined "what" and "how".

Context can assist in narrowing the scope a little, but many assumptions are almost guaranteed.
After all, assumption is the mother of all ...

Ozeco41 provided a clear viewpoint near the beginning of this thread...


I suggest that if anyone is confused about what is intended by use of the acronym, that they assume the literal meaning...

Made It Happen On Purpose aka MIHOP

...regardless of who, what and how.

If you choose to assume a USG prefix, that's fine. Just don't assume everyone else is.

If you're not using the acronym with a literal meaning, then I suggest the need to qualify the "who", "what" and "how" increases.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Your OP post (and those following it) in this split thread, asserting a singular meaning to "what does MIHOP mean" has been proven wrong.
Click to expand...

incorrect. We're referring to THIS forum. On THIS forum, it has but one meaning.

Start another thread about something you know about.
Click to expand...
...
Click to expand...

So you don't know anything else but your own personal interpretation of MIHOP?



FYI - you don't always have to be correct to be viewed as smart.
 
NoahFence said:
Would someone please close this stupid thread?!?

All it is now (and has been for weeks) is F2's constant use of the word "incorrect" in places where people aren't actually incorrect. And it's a stage for his belittling of anybody not in agreement with his one-sided view. For the love of God and everything good in this world, just end it.
Click to expand...

Is something forcing you to click the thread link? Otherwise, ignore it.
 
NoahFence said:
We're referring to THIS forum.
Click to expand...
No, we're not.

On THIS forum, it has but one meaning.
Click to expand...
Incorrect.

So you don't know anything else but your own personal interpretation of MIHOP?
Click to expand...
You are descending into nonsensical posting. My prior use has been pretty much solely literal. The additional scope presented is that used by others. You seem to be getting rather confused.

FYI - you don't always have to be correct to be viewed as smart.
Click to expand...
Deep.
 
Last edited:
LOL - I clicked femr2's link.



ETA - "Proof by google hits" doesn't mean anything; I just thought it was amusing. I'm not saying it proves anyone right / wrong, so femr2 please don't get bent out of shape for me clicking your link and seeing / posting the top results.
 
Last edited:
femr2 said:
And ["Peak oil" MIHOP] brings back 184000 :rolleyes:

More than zero then...
Click to expand...

And "william shakespeare" mihop returns 3,600,000

So what?

Beachnut has accurately pointed out that without the quotes your Google search claim is meaningless. But you knew this, yet still seek to deceive.
 
From Oystein - POST 3(!!??!!!)

You aren't Humpty Dumpty. If you want to communicate successfully with people here, your meaning of acronyms should be what everybody else thinks their meaning is.
Click to expand...

Here, on the JREF 9/11 subforum, MIHOP = US Government did it.

Period.

NOT INCORRECT
 
MIHOP is impossible without implicating tens of thousands of people...

Heck, as pointed out by SoT, there were 7,000+ FBI agents as part of the investigation alone. Each and every one of them sworn to remain secret forever? Yeah, right.

Depending on which "remote plane" and "CD" 9/11 theory you subscribe to, that number jumps exponentially. Quite reasonably into the hundreds of thousands of people "in on it".

MIHOP is the easiest to prove if it were true. It only would take a miniscule percentage of folks to come forward. Nothing, nowhere, that the gov't initiates can or will operate at 100%.

MIHOP is the dumbest theory in truther-land....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom