Your post is irrelevant to the thread topic.The accurate data was in the wrong place...
Your post is irrelevant to the thread topic.The accurate data was in the wrong place...
Your question is irrelevant to the thread topic.
you have jumped on the recent band-wagon of petty name calling
My userID is femr2, not "F2".
Incorrect. Do you accuse everyone you disagree with of lying ?You are lying.
Incorrect. Do you accuse everyone you disagree with of lying ?You are lying again.
Who said it was ?"F2" is not a childish name or profane slang phrase.
My userID is femr2, not "F2".It is a technical term for a type of tornado.
Your question is irrelevant to the thread topic.In fact, it kinda blows away your entire claim, doesn't it, champ?
Incorrect. Do you accuse everyone you disagree with of lying ?
The question is off topic.Why can't you answer the question, F2?
What claim ?In fact, it kinda blows away your entire claim, doesn't it, champ?
The question is off topic.
Always reminds me of...Yes, keep lying like that. It really impresses people and helps to make your case.
'You lie,' said Wormtongue.
'That word comes too oft and easy from your lips,' said Gandalf. 'I do not lie. See, Théoden, here is a snake! With safety you cannot take it with you, nor can you leave it behind. To slay it would be just. But it was not always as it now is. Once it was a man, and did you service in its fashion. Give him a horse and let him go at once, wherever he chooses. By his choice you shall judge him.'
I don't implicate the US Government in a MIHOP scenario. I don't suggest a "who" in prior usage of the acronym.Since you can't explain a MIHOP scenario without implicating the US government, then MIHOP means US government involvement.
No, it's not.
I've stated the kind of scope I've used the acronym in in the past (any-who, any-what, any-how), and if that's not good enough for you. Tough luck I'm afraid.
My personal view of "the events of 9/11" is not the topic here.
ROFL. Who I do or do not think did or did not make "it" happen is irrelevant to the thread topic.Of course they are otherwise how can we know who you think made it happen and what it is.
Left out Illuminati MIHOP, you got Aliens MIHOP, missed Alien MIHOP? And Alien3MIHOP. DIEHARDMIHOP, ... Plus you left out the extra highly intellectual ones; Smart Idiots MIHOP (SIMIHOP), or the super intellectual JPIMIHOP, Just Plain Idiots MIHOP.Always reminds me of...
over the years...
... .
- Cheney-Bush MIHOP
- Peak Oil MIHOP
- Mossad MIHOP
- Zionist MIHOP
- Jewish MIHOP
- New World Order MIHOP
- Rogue Network MIHOP
- Space Aliens MIHOP
- Al Qaeda MIHOP
"Peak Oil MIHOP" - 165
"Bush MIHOP" - 745
"Bush Cheney MIHOP" -7
Gosh, I dunno, MT, why would someone confine one's evidentiary data to a cherry-picked (using undisclosed criteria) subset of the visual data available on 9/11 which doesn't include the planes hitting the buildings?Femr has specialized in measurements and observables. The measurements and observables are ignored while the group seems most interested in his personal beliefs.
Why ignore his measurements while focussing on his personal beliefs
Then how do you explain the largest criminal investigation in galactic history (7,000+ FBI agents plus support personnel), the FEMA collapse investigation, the two NIST investigations, the 9/11 Commission report and intelligence recovered by US servicemen and operatives in the field all overwhelmingly pointing to Osama Bin Laden and his minions without implicating the US government?
Gosh, I dunno, MT, why would someone confine one's evidentiary data to a cherry-picked (using undisclosed criteria) subset of the visual data available on 9/11 which doesn't include the planes hitting the buildings?
... the femr ...
It's not a complete list. Add it if you like.Left out Illuminati MIHOP
I've not stated "anyone" MIHOP.No one ever said JMIHOP, save you.
Do you really think linking to a user profile with an obscene hand gesture avatar picture is a good idea ?OMG, there is a JMIHOP! http://www.imagefap.com/profile/jmihop oh noes
I've looked at many possibilities.Based on the goalless video analysis of WTC 7 point falling, and the extensive "Demolition" videos, which MIHOP is your MIHOP?
Off topic.Wait, is that analysis on hold?
Peak Oil MIHOP - 141000 results.POMIHOP - 7 results on google
MIHOP - 342000 (obviously comprising all "who")MIHOP, 340,000 results.
Off topic.Gosh, I dunno, MT, why would someone confine one's evidentiary data to a cherry-picked (using undisclosed criteria) subset of the visual data available on 9/11 which doesn't include the planes hitting the buildings?
Off topic. My userID is femr2. Whilst it is clear others using names such as "kiddo" have openly stated intent as a form of "talking down to" me, I'm aware you have no ill intent.Off topic, and shows no reading comprehension. Didn't you see the femr WTC2 aircraft impact study elsewhere? WTC2 impact orientation was off by between 7 and 9,5 degrees from the NIST calculation. Try looking a little closer at the website (at the menu titled "aircraft impacts"...big hint)
The "evidentiary data", whatever that means to you, covers the complete visual record. Explained in the website. The visual record is treated as a whole. Not a single video is hidden from the accumulated record.
...
Peak Oil MIHOP - 141000 results.
and have trouble picking. One day you will gain enough knowledge and figure out 911. Good luck. I am now seeing why you and Major Tom have problems figuring out 911. There are so many false claims out there to pick from, and you guys have to sort them out before making up your minds. A lot of MIHOPs to sort through. good luck again!looked at many possibilities.
For what it is worth....Off topic. My userID is femr2. Whilst it is clear others using names such as "kiddo" have openly stated intent as a form of "talking down to" me, I'm aware you have no ill intent.