Continuation Part 3 - Discussion of the Amanda Knox case

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ha, very nicely done! And so true - I've always thought the tabloids would've gotten a lot of mileage out of the vampire photo if the situation had been reversed (as they did with Raffaele's MySpace bleach photo).

Yes, what troubles me is that crap works with some people. :boggled:

Yup. At the risk of over-using the term "ex-post-facto rationalisation",

That's what I meant the dozen or more times I told Platonov he was 'thinking backwards!' Now I know the fancy name again, thanks. :)

That can be applied to arguments from him and some others about the whole case in many respects. The Massei Report, a post-hoc rationalization itself, is inherently correct thus everyone who disagrees with it must be wrong somehow, so all they have to do is find, or think they can find, any mistake in our reasoning, because it must be there somewhere! Comparing cool charts from different starting points that come up with different numbers must be the trick if you don't realize you have to start at the beginning sometimes--or that it could possibly differ dependent upon which factors are taken into consideration. :p
 
I think the morning after story Amanda told is pure bulls***.

But that still wouldn't make them anything more than a pair of nervy murder discoverers (which is how I see them)

I found an earlier post a few pages ago about the cameras picking up the arrival of the postals but missing any morning returns by Amanda, or her and Raff to be quite interesting...

I personally think the mop story is BS. But I also think the Lana bomb threat is BS I think the cats blood on the downstairs light switch is BS. I think the Quintinville sighting is BS. I think the Toto sighting is BS (although I disagree with LJ that that was good...after all it proved AK and RS had a perfect alibi during the actual TOD.) I think anything Filomena said was BS.

Anyone who suggests AK and RS waltzed around the murder house barefoot is nuts. As are those who claim they killed a person with the huge knife and then returned that knife to the drawer to now be used for cooking. That is just plain BS.

Your point about no parking garage image could mean AK and RS took an alternate route on their various trips so that is a non issue.

I’ve tried to put AK and RS together with RG perhaps making a cold November night run for drugs but how does that jive with RG story?

In that vein though I have always been interested at the level of RS stash of drugs that night. Was he out? Did he have an ounce? This very important question has never been asked or answered as far as I know.

Smoking, eating, sexing....why go out into the cold November night? No reason I can think of.

I think Amanda went to her house to shower in the morning and change for the trip to Grubbio. I think RS was up late working on his Masters thesis that was due in short order. The trip to Grubbio after all was to look for a restaurant to hold his graduation party.

So I’m left thinking the mop story is BS...I think I’m wrong about the mop...And right about everything else. I think there was very little lying by these two...more translation error than anything else...plus AK is a little odd...but an endearing odd not a murderous odd...a high top sneaker wearing with dress while pretending to play the accordion in the middle of the street odd. Others call that artsy...lots of adjectives but not killer, murderer or witch. Just a poor girl and guy caught up in a real nightmare born in the mind of a twisted man about a simple and sad murder.
 
Hi , Skwinty, LondonJohn, and others,
Life's interesting, you never know where it will lead. I find I've lived thru a lot of similair situations when comparing this murder we discuss to my own life:

In my own life's experiences, I've had a photo published of me in a surf magazine, back in the '80's when I was a young dude, with a fliped up brim on the baseball hat, lookin' tough, holding a real Uzi machine gun that a big time local drug dealer surfer that I casually knew owned. A pose for the camera, tough surfer guy image, the magagzine liked it's potrayal of me and ran it. Didn't make me a murderer though.

I've had a female friend show me a video clip of animal porn that she found amusingly, sickly find of funny, and yet neithr she nor I are murderers.

I've been to quite a few classical concerts watching the Santa Monica Symphony play, and have even been to the Hollywood Bowl, and I'm still not a murderer.

I've smoked a lotta pot before, even smoked some Lebanese blonde hash a few times, and that didn't cause me to murder anyone.

I've lived with housemates and have been scolded before for leaving dirty dishes, and not cleaning up the bathroom. Heck, I even luved 1 gal enough to visit her therapist and discuss our problems, which included me scolding her for a lack of desire to help keep the bathroom clean. And yet I didn't murder her.

I've loaned condoms to both guys and girls, and never murdered any of them.


Great post! :)

I'm sure there are bunnies and kittens cowering in fear of you now! A far milder post of mine in a similar vein caused Treehorn to wonder if he should be scared of me. I thought that was funny and offered him some bodybags. I think he realized I was kidding. :p

Incidentally, the one thing I could help but notice eventually reading through the Foxy Knoxy smear eclectically, and finally I went looking for it as it puzzled me, was where were the ones about the people she hated? Where was the supposed anger in this girl? Why is she making excuses for people (police in general, the one who hit her during the interrogation, Raffaele when she was told he lied for her etc.) that might well have inspired rage in a lot of people?

At the time I was still on the fence and it didn't make her innocent, but it seemed to me a lot of effort had gone into finding her every foible and the one thing distinctly missing was her showing contempt for people in just about any way, she just didn't seem threatening or make any and you'd figure they'd find that and zero in on it when making a monster of her was the goal. There were some weird things she (supposedly in one case) said, that snappish (presumably) comment about whether bleeding to death would hurt, but it didn't seem she lost control often in a negative way.

I remember when something was being criticized here and this (post of March 2nd) hadn't been released yet at that site and it was said that were it to be, it would make Amanda look something like a crazed maniac. I'd wondered what it was, and actually was hoping to see it some day, and eventually I wandered across it looking for something else and realized it had been made public later without uproar.

I read through it and it does come across as odd in a way, here she's been thrown in jail for murder and she writes a fairy-tale of sorts and draws pictures of happy things. Thinking about it though, it just seemed to me a sad girl trying to make the best of things and escape the misery she was enduring. At this point one might think some anger would be displayed, but not that I could see.

Some have recently been arguing that Amanda and Meredith were not friends.

I wonder, did they know that on Oct. 30, 2007, Amanda, Meredith, Laura and Filomena had gathered around the kitchen table together at lunchtime in their apartment for the last time? And when Raffaele showed up, he made them pasta for lunch?

Hours later, Meredith, with a couple of her English gal pals too, joined Amanda and Raff for some wine at La Tana Dell'Orso, one of the few above ground bars in town boasting boasting of having "Perugia's best wine selection". Meredith was said by the owner of the place to be a regular customer there, and they spent 2 hours together at the table sharing a litter of white house wine.

I might hazard a guess that if they had lunch together, and then happy hour too, well they probably enjoyed each others company. Wouldn't you agree?

I've sat at a table, with my luver, and some friends, had a bottle or two of wine and never murdered any of them.


I've read that no one in the house, either upstairs or downstairs, reported any tension between Meredith and Amanda. Nobody ever heard Amanda criticizing Meredith, raising her voice to her nor anyone else. Marco, one of the boyz downstairs, said their relationship was "idyllic". Heck, Giacomo, Meredith's luver, called it "tranquil", and makes mention "of all the people in the house, they got on best together."

Yet people still believe the prosecutions theory, which was used to convict Amanda and Raffaele, that Amanda, when told she did not have to work on that slow Thursday night, decided to bring over a huuuge kitchen knife and with her new boyfriend of only 6 days help, and some other guy she barely even knew, physically stabbed her friend Meredith again and again in her throat, because they were not friends or had cleanliness issues.

Sure...
:boggled:

Thanks for the reminder of this, I had forgotten about it. Also I believe the night before the murder, on Halloween, she asked Meredith to join her and sent 'kisses' through her text, and of course they were facebook friends. Not of course that any one of those is especially significant, however when it all is added up it amounts to a 'mountain of evidence' ( :p ) that Amanda and Meredith got along fine, and opposing that is catty gossip from the middle of a tabloid firestorm after a murder that amounted to little more than complaints loving married couples might make sometimes.

Plus I recall an establishment where I once hung out where due to vent or something the acoustics allowed for guys in the bathroom to hear what the ladies were saying as they were washing up or waiting if you were in the back part where the ones where you sat down were. That would mean they should be able to hear too, but guys seem to talk less in the restroom especially in those comparative areas. I recall sometimes they'd say the cattiest things about the people they seemed to be with, then go out and I'd recognize the voices and they'd be chatting away all smiles and everything. I thought that was funny, as it was not an uncommon phenomena.

Incidentally, I liked your post on sharks but I prefer dolphins. I guess I was influenced by the viscous defamation of them in "Jaws" as a kid, especially the part where Robert Shaw puts his fingernails to the chalkboard and tells the tale of the U.S.S. Indianapolis. 'Eleven hundred men went into the water...' I forget how many came out, but it wasn't anywhere near that many! :p
 
Last edited:
So I’m left thinking the mop story is BS...I think I’m wrong about the mop...And right about everything else. I think there was very little lying by these two...more translation error than anything else...plus AK is a little odd...but an endearing odd not a murderous odd...a high top sneaker wearing with dress while pretending to play the accordion in the middle of the street odd. Others call that artsy...lots of adjectives but not killer, murderer or witch. Just a poor girl and guy caught up in a real nightmare born in the mind of a twisted man about a simple and sad murder.

The mop thing threw me too, as it seemed like the sort of fable that might be developed in response to aggressive interrogation, but I guess something like that might have happened, is there any confirmation on this about Raffaele strange pipe? I can't seem to recall anything official and once it was a contested issue from what I remember reading either way back in the threads or elsewhere. I don't think anything has been posted on it since the Massei Report translation was finished, and I'm drawing a blank reading about it in there.

One thing though, when I was considering it fantasy I didn't realize Raffaele's 'interview' was so short on the 5th. He didn't really have much time for them be chasing him around about the mop, he was in their clutches from shortly after they got there at 10:15 and it was 10:40 when his statement was timestamped. I've always wondered what happened to him after that while they were interrogating Amanda. I don't recall hearing much of anything about Raffaele from the time he signed the statement to when Amanda was arrested. There's the 'psychologically tortured,' the seizing of his shoes, the demand to see the lawyer or call his father, but there's not much of any indication when this all happened. I remember some discussion on exactly when he was arrested, however I don't recall a resolution at all. Did you come across any of that, or anyone else for that matter?
 
Your memory may be a bit shakey (is is that Juve?).

Amanda testified about the toilet flushing:
LG: I asked you before about how you organized the apartment, the meals, the cleaning. Was it fine, were there problems?

AK: Well, for example, [laughing] I certainly wasn't the cleanest person in the house. For example, the only time Meredith said something to me, well, it's because the toilets here are a bit different from the ones in America. You have to use a toilet brush here and it happened to me often to just forget to do that. Once she told me, it was a little "awkward" [in English], well it was a bit embarrassing but in the end it was fine, it was "cool". Then before that, a few days before, Laura and Filomena had organized a program of who was taking out the trash and so forth. Before they did that, we were just taking out the trash when it was full, or when there were dirty dishes, someone just did it, it wasn't organized point by point.​
<snip>

:relieved: Thank God, three pages later, someone finally uses Amanda's testimony to answer bolint's question about the toilet. It was not that Meredith complained about Amanda not flushing. It was that Amanda told the court that Meredith had once explained to her about using the brush.

Sqwinty, it was not because Amanda wasn't used to flushing the toilet, it was because she didn't want to use a brush to clean up someone else's poop. LJ, when Raffaele arrived, he looked in the right toilet, but the feces had slipped down by that time, so he didn't see them; the cops looked more carefully and found them.

Amanda may have been startled by the condition of the toilet not only because, as she said, no one in the apartment would leave it like that, but also because she knew that the girls who used that bathroom were out of town.
 
On the other hand, any evidence to the contrary (Knox's outstanding academic record, Sollecito's close relationship with his father, the fact that they met at a classical music concert, etc) is minimised or even totally brushed over...

Imagine what would have been said if they'd met at a Marilyn Manson concert!
 
Certainly it is. If it were not a problem then the case would be solved.

Of course, if I show something which is an obvious lie, then it is
- coerced
- stoned
- imprecise
- confused
- beaten out
- inadmissible
- not beyond reasonable doubt
- or any combination of the above

There's no use crying about it. If you want to "show something which is an obvious lie" then yes, you have show an obvious lie and not something better explained by an internalised false statement or honest error. Sorry if that's too hard for you but it's how it works.

If you want to sell us on the idea that Knox should be convicted you have to point us to something at least resembling proof beyond reasonable doubt that she was there when the murder happened and she participated. Once again I realise that this makes things difficult for you but complaining about it won't get you anywhere.

Proof beyond reasonable doubt that Raffaele might not have checked the right toilet for poop wouldn't put either of them in the murder house at the time of death, so I really don't see why you're focusing on it when you still don't have anything resembling a coherent narrative of the crime. I mean, maybe I just can't see it but how is this poop business going to turn out to be the lynchpin of a coherent theory?
 
I wonder, did they know that on Oct. 30, 2007, Amanda, Meredith, Laura and Filomena had gathered around the kitchen table together at lunchtime in their apartment for the last time? And when Raffaele showed up, he made them pasta for lunch?

Have you got a cite for that?
 
That she had not talked about it before reporting it to Napoleoni after the discovery of the murder. Neither to Raffaele, nor to Filomena.

Ok so in your opinion this is a little odd - bu how is evidence like this (which is pretty much all that is left) indicative of her involvement in the murder? There are several possible explanations for why AK did what she did in this case and most of them innocent. THe same is true with most of the other remaining "evidence" as well or is merely coincidence or differences in recollection that naturally occur when multiple people try to recall from memory a series of what at the time were inconsequential events.

Compare this case to the Laci Peterson murder in California where the prosecution had almost no physical evidence that Scott Peterson was the killer. There his behavior was suspect - attempt to flee the country, going fishing on Christmas Day on San Francisco Bay in a small boat suitable for small inland lakes and months later the bodies of Laci and the unborn baby are found within 1 - 2 miles of the boat ramp hee Scott launched his boat for his "fishing trip", having a lover to whom he promised he would soon be able to spend more time with, his detached unemotional inolvement in the search for Laci, his distancing himself from Laci's family shortly after her disppearance, etc.
 
I guess I am missing the point, Bolint. What in this time frame around 7-8pm if they indeed went out on the town are they trying to cover-up? How is it related to Meredith's murder? Why are they trying to hide something in this time frame? What do you think it means?

I think our esteemed poster - Bolint - is trying VERY HARD to establish that Amanda KNox is a congenital liar who lies about EVERYTHING no matter how big or small the matter is as it relates to the case. After all, this is all they have left, she is a liar therefore she is guilty of murder! (liar, liar pants on fire - Off with her head! - well ok no capital punishment in Italy then put her away for 30 years at least - we hate her!)
 
That's what I doubt.

To my knowledge there is nothing between 18:27 and 20:35 that proves that they were at home.

Is there anything according to you?

I think "Bo" is trying to crate a window of time and an opportunity for Raf amd Amanda to meet up with Rudy and arrange an "intense sexual sensation" experience for Raf for later that evening. Of course he has no evidence to support this - only conjecture.

BTW - IF and this is a HUGE IF your WAG above is true wouldn't Raf's flat be a more suitable spot to get together for this "menage a trois" than the cramped space in the cottage?
 
This argument applies to every one, not just the accused.

"Their statements are only what they claim to recall"

Your statement is invalid and shows how little you know of the actual case not the case as reported in the media. Here are 3 proven ILE lies:

1.) ILE lie - The Harry Potter book was not at Raf's therefore AK lied about reading it to Raf the night of the murder. FACT - The police video taken of Raf's flat before the hearing where the above lie was made in court (hearing date was Dec 12th IIRC and the video was done about mid-November between the 15th and 18th again IIRC) you can see the book in plain sight in the video.

2.) ILE lie - In leaks to the press, ILE claimed that the clothes AK had been wearing on Nov 1st were missing (implying of course that they were blood splattered from the murder and had to be disposd of). FACT - Pictures of AK's room after the murder on Nov 2nd. BUT before it ws "tossed" show her clothes lying on the bed just where she said she had left them.

3.) ILE lie - Again in a leak to the media, ILE claimed to have found a receipt for bleach purchasd the morning after the murder (Nov 2nd). FACT - There was no receipt, Raf's housekeeper testified Raf had a bottle of bleach in his flat before the murder - that was still there AFTER the murder. (This is why Mr. Q was a "super witness" claiming to see AK in his store on Nov 2nd AM acting "suspicous" around the bleach display - however, this claim was made over a year after the murder and was contradicted by one of his store employees and by Mr. Q himself shortly after the murder when he was shown AK's picture by a police investigator and said he had never seen her.

I could list another half dozen lies just by Steffi alone.
 
false equivalence

This argument applies to every one, not just the accused.

"Their statements are only what they claim to recall"
Skwinty,

By using two separate false claims, Ms. Comodi in effect changed the time of Amanda's first call to her mom from 4:45 AM to 3:00 AM. She had access to Amanda's phone records and should know how to correct for differences in when daylight savings time start in different countries. If this were an honest error, it would be very difficult for me to excuse. There is a big difference between what people say solely relying upon their memory and what they say when they have records that they can check. Ditto for Onofarar's list.
 
Last edited:
RWVBWL said:
I wonder, did they know that on Oct. 30, 2007, Amanda, Meredith, Laura and Filomena had gathered around the kitchen table together at lunchtime in their apartment for the last time? And when Raffaele showed up, he made them pasta for lunch?[1quote]
Have you got a cite for that?
Good day, Dan O.
The gals got together for the last time on Oct 30, 2007 for lunch and talked about guy issues. Raff showed up and made them pasta lunch, Laura didn't eat, as she had ate earlier, but they had a "very nice" lunch, according to Filomena.

Pages 44 and 45, Murder in Italy, Author: Candace Dempsey.

Lunch with the Italian girls and Amanda +Raff
and then wine in the evening while out on the town with a couple of the English gals and Amanda + Raff.
Yep, Meredith and Amanda sure hated each other.
Right...
:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Skwinty,

By using two separate false claims, Ms. Comodi in effect changed the time of Amanda's first call to her mom from 4:45 AM to 3:00 AM. She had access to Amanda's phone records and should know how to correct for differences in when daylight savings time start in different countries. If this were an honest error, it would be very difficult for me to excuse. There is a big difference between what people say solely relying upon their memory and what they say when they have records that they can check. Ditto for Onofarar's list.

Did Ms Camodi state these times from memory, after looking at the records, or did she deliberately falsify the records to agree with her statement?

That would make a difference would it not?

The same for any witness for the prosecution. Did they not give testimony based on their recall.

It seems that the pro acquittal side want to have different standards of evidence for the prosecution and defence.

According to the pro acquittal side, the prosecution have zero evidence against Sollecito and Knox. Given the outcome of the first trial, this sounds strange and certainly would give rise to suspicion of conspiracy.
 
Yep, Meredith and Amanda sure hated each other.
Right...
:rolleyes:

Where do you get the idea that they hated each other?

Are you saying that Meredith did not complain to her friends about Amanda?

Is everything about the prosecution a lie?
 
RWVBWL said:
I wonder, did they know that on Oct. 30, 2007, Amanda, Meredith, Laura and Filomena had gathered around the kitchen table together at lunchtime in their apartment for the last time? And when Raffaele showed up, he made them pasta for lunch?[1quote]

Good day, Dan O.
The gals got together for the last time on Oct 30, 2007 for lunch and talked about guy issues. Raff showed up and made them pasta lunch, Laura didn't eat, as she had ate earlier, but they had a "very nice" lunch, according to Filomena.

Pages 44 and 45, Murder in Italy, Author: Candace Dempsey.

Lunch with the Italian girls and Amanda +Raff
and then wine in the evening while out on the town with a couple of the English gals and Amanda + Raff.
Yep, Meredith and Amanda sure hated each other.
Right...
:rolleyes:

Like the way you write.
Its neat and down to earth and true.
cheers
 
Good day, Dan O.
The gals got together for the last time on Oct 30, 2007 for lunch and talked about guy issues. Raff showed up and made them pasta lunch, Laura didn't eat, as she had ate earlier, but they had a "very nice" lunch, according to Filomena.

Pages 44 and 45, Murder in Italy, Author: Candace Dempsey.

Thanks, that's another datapoint that goes into my timeline.


Just imagining the 4 girls in that small cottage kitchen at the same time and Raffaele there cutting up some mushrooms for the pasta, if he were to turn around, there would undoubtably be someone there at the point of the knife.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom