• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Watch trailer: 9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out

Isn't it strange how they all think they have irrefutable proof of all their delusions, yet the only thing their brainwashing tells them to do about it is troll the internet acting like pompous idiots...

"The great virtue of a fake conspiracy is that it calls on you to do nothing."

- George Monbiot
 
The way the fell the same, in perfection, with the same speed and both in there own footprint.

That are a lot of coincidences, u probably wont see that, but a highrise architect does see the coincidences.
The towers and WTC 7 did not fall the same, in perfection, not at the same speed, and not into their (there) own foot print. You got four things wrong in one sentence.

No coincidences, just ignorance on the side of 911 truth. If you found an architect who thinks there are coincidences like you do, then you need to find a structural engineer who understands what buildings are made not how they are suppose to look. You must of found an architect who does not have much background in structural engineering.
 
i am convinced every single expert in the USA has seen at least several videos of the collapses. And i also asume to most it didn't look suspicious, because only a tiny little fringe came out to dispute the conclusions of NIST.
i don't claim all experts have read the NIST report, most propably have not. I am saying most experts did not see anything suspicious.

Your claims and opinion are not imporant for me, you have got to understand that.

I want some proof. Maybe not a lot of experts knows about the NIST reports or building 7.

And if u watch the interviews with all those experts, the most say they never watched the nist reports, and knew nothing or a little bit about building 7.


What's the difference? Do have to believe a certain theory? Obviously it doesn't have to do with qualifications.

You really dont understand it....well bad luck for you.
 
Simple questions about wtc 1, 2 and 7 i will ignore, please comment the video, or visit another thread.
 
Last edited:
I was never good at religion.

:rolleyes:

But you like religion isnt it:D

You like to believe without evidence, that osama bin laden did it. That afghanistan en iraq also did it.

And that osama has been thrown in the sea:D
 
But you like religion isnt it:D

You like to believe without evidence, that osama bin laden did it. That afghanistan en iraq also did it.

And that osama has been thrown in the sea:D

Yea. No evidence at all to support the commonly-held narrative of 9-11, is there? :boggled:

Jesus. At least do what most truthers do and claim it's all fake. That's at least a little less crazy than claiming it doesn't exist.
 
Yea. No evidence at all to support the commonly-held narrative of 9-11, is there? :boggled:

Jesus. At least do what most truthers do and claim it's all fake. That's at least a little less crazy than claiming it doesn't exist.

Amen
 
Simple questions about wtc 1, 2 and 7 i will ignore, please comment the video, or visit another thread.
Why aren't you equally concerned about WTC 3, 4, 5, and 6?

Do you know all of them were destroyed on 9/11 despite the fact no airplane hit them?
 
Your claims and opinion are not imporant for me, you have got to understand that.

I want some proof. Maybe not a lot of experts knows about the NIST reports or building 7.

And if u watch the interviews with all those experts, the most say they never watched the nist reports, and knew nothing or a little bit about building 7.




You really dont understand it....well bad luck for you.

then why is your little fringe group of experts not able to Mobilize the other experts?
 
Last edited:
then why is your little fringe group of experts not able to Mobilize the other experts?

I guess the ae911truth has more experts(1500plus in a couple of years) that knows about the nist reports and building 7.

Than experts that supporting the official story
 
I guess the ae911truth has more experts(1500plus in a couple of years) that knows about the nist reports and building 7.

Than experts that supporting the official story


Facepalm or laughing dog? Decisions, decisions...
 
I guess the ae911truth has more experts(1500plus in a couple of years) that knows about the nist reports and building 7.

Than experts that supporting the official story

Why are they appearing in Youtube videos rather than engineering journals?
 

Back
Top Bottom