• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Watch trailer: 9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out

Hmmmm...

I'm an expert in acting. I have an MFA, I'm a member of AEA & SAG, I make a good living performing & teaching others how too.

So using the logic of the op, I'm qualified to say that due to the body language & vocal patterns of those in the vid, few belive what they are saying and those few are mentally unstable.
 
Marokkaan said:
Well show me if the experts of america read the nist report. How big is the chance all the possible experts of america are interested to read the NIST reports
Click to expand...

well when it was so obivously a CD as you believe and many truthers claim, like i did once, one would expect that those that actually have the education to know it better would read it. Especially those that then later were confronted with a changed building code. but nothing. they accepted it. just a small fringe group doesn't and those are not able to mobilize other Experts to expose the biggest crime in our time?
 
The 73-year-old biologist, Dr. Margulis, holds a number of other opinions that are at odds with fundamental understandings of things even in her own field - from Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynn_Margulis

Margulis holds a number of opinions outside of mainstream science. In 2009 she co-authored a paper [7] arguing that the change in spirochete form, from more motile helical to more inactive cyst and back, may be a causal contributor to AIDS.
In 2009 she also pushed the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) to publish a paper by Donald I. Williamson arguing that butterflies are the result of hybridization of a now extinct insect and velvet worms. Williamson's paper provoked immediate response from the scientific community, including a paper in PNAS.[10] Developmental Biologist and Professor at Duke university Fred Nijhout was quoted as saying that the paper was better suited for "National Enquirer than the National Academy.". In September it was announced that PNAS will eliminate Communicated submissions in July 2010 but PNAS stated that the decision had nothing to do with the Williamson controversy.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Dayan81 said:
Do you have any evidence that the American experts in architecture, engineering, & chemistry did not read the NIST 9-11 report?
Click to expand...

No.

Now i want an answer from you.

Redtail said:
Hmmmm...

I'm an expert in acting. I have an MFA, I'm a member of AEA & SAG, I make a good living performing & teaching others how too.

So using the logic of the op, I'm qualified to say that due to the body language & vocal patterns of those in the vid, few belive what they are saying and those few are mentally unstable.
Click to expand...

Tell me an example of somebody in the vid. Im curious HAHAHAH


DC said:
well when it was so obivously a CD as you believe and many truthers claim, like i did once, one would expect that those that actually have the education to know it better would read it. Especially those that then later were confronted with a changed building code. but nothing. they accepted it. just a small fringe group doesn't and those are not able to mobilize other Experts to expose the biggest crime in our time?
Click to expand...

You still didnt answered my question...
 
My real opinion is that all this is great. If you have all this stuff and it's so powerful, you can stop posting on Youtube, the David Ike forum, the JREF and take this to a real court room. That would be great. When's the plan for this? When are Truthers going to stop thinking that posting on the JREF isn't something major? When will we be seeing discussions about this at major academic events for structural engineering or high-energy materials?

My guess is never. Either give me a date or stop pretending you're saying anything different than the slop you've always been saying.
 
DC said:
oh you asked a question ?
Click to expand...

:D

Well show me if the experts of america read the nist report. How big is the chance all the possible experts of america are interested to read the NIST reports?
 
Marokkaan said:
:D

Well show me if the experts of america read the nist report. How big is the chance all the possible experts of america are interested to read the NIST reports?
Click to expand...

i am convinced every single expert in the USA has seen at least several videos of the collapses. And i also asume to most it didn't look suspicious, because only a tiny little fringe came out to dispute the conclusions of NIST.
i don't claim all experts have read the NIST report, most propably have not. I am saying most experts did not see anything suspicious.
 
Scott Sommers said:
My real opinion is that all this is great. If you have all this stuff and it's so powerful, you can stop posting on Youtube, the David Ike forum, the JREF and take this to a real court room. That would be great. When's the plan for this? When are Truthers going to stop thinking that posting on the JREF isn't something major? When will we be seeing discussions about this at major academic events for structural engineering or high-energy materials?

My guess is never. Either give me a date or stop pretending you're saying anything different than the slop you've always been saying.
Click to expand...

Isn't it strange how they all think they have irrefutable proof of all their delusions, yet the only thing their brainwashing tells them to do about it is troll the internet acting like pompous idiots...
 
Marokkaan said:
Well show me if the experts of america read the nist report. How big is the chance all the possible experts of america are interested to read the NIST reports
Click to expand...
Right, the collapse of 2 of the largest buildings in the USA was of no interest at all to architects, engineers, and firefighters. :boggled:
 
DGM said:
Is there a difference between the "truth" movement and the ae9/11 movement? If so, what is it?
Click to expand...
The truth movement is based largely on the musings and lies of a theologian, David Ray Griffin.

ae911truth took these musings and lies and made a slide show out of them.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom