Richard Gage Blueprint for Truth Rebuttals on YouTube by Chris Mohr

Status
Not open for further replies.
I can't believe we started with Mrkinnies and have gotten someone even worse, Marokkaan, who apparently thinks he is still on youtube.

U ARE RONG OMG... u debunkars are teh idiots LOLZ :D

:rolleyes::rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Sunstealer said:
It's not a sol gel process either. It's all a bit Blue Peter - here's one I made earlier!

Blue Peter was a childrens TV series in the UK. They'd often show children how to make stuff tat and to save time, like when something has to be glued they'd skip to the next or last stage with the immortal words " here's one I made earlier".
Click to expand...

Get down Shep! I'm a Brit and sticky back plastic and washing up liquid bottles were much in demand!:):)

This super sekrit nano thermite was so hot that it didn't manage to melt through the pyrex beaker (MP 821°C) :D
Click to expand...

actually it probably was but there simply was insufficient mass to do so....the CT has the same problem with the WTC........the beaker looks spoiled though.:D
 
bill smith said:
They all seem to be 2001 or 2002 Tri. Surprising that nobody technical seems to be writing stuff to support the government story since then. Bar NIST of course who are to all intents and putrposes the government.
Not much confidence out there any more I think. We will no doubt revisit the subject with the authors come the day.
Click to expand...

Yea, it's always "some day" huh bill? We're going to reach the tipping point aaaaaaaany day now, huh? Anything to keep from having to begin suspecting that you may not know what you're talking about, and the "truth" movement just really might simply be a little cult of irrelevant conspiracy theorists.

LOL
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
They all seem to be 2001 or 2002 Tri.
Click to expand...

Wrong. Just how many do you need to see past that date? I just want to know so I can find them for you, otherwise I'm not going to waste my time.

Incidently, why would it matter no one really published much since then? You claim its obvious its a demolition, so why is there zero support for that? WHy can no one see it but your fringe little group?
 
Last edited:
sheeplesnshills said:
bill smith said:
Nonsense I've seen it desputed in every 911 forum that allows debate.




Nor will it until twoofers do it first.




Really? so if i get a peper saying the moon is made of green cheese and pay to have it published in a vanity journal it will become the offical difinative work on the subject. LOL you are utterly delusional.



No it wasn't the &*^$%^$ edititor said it wasn't!!!!!



LOL not able either :)



I have, its simply a statement. Its worthless as evidence of anything




stpo lying, it does no such thing.




????? what did I forge?:jaw-dropp
Click to expand...

Do you have her resignation statement ?
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
 
Marokkaan said:
I told chris mohr, he is spoiling his energy with his research.

Because he dont have the knowledge to talk about it.

I told him to pay attention, to collect experts who can research and try to refute the shocking results of the other experts.
Click to expand...

But you see, he did consult the experts. There are quite a few of us here at the JREF. Ryan Mackey is a rocket surgeon or some other crazy **** like that, Sunstealer is a metal dude, Dave Rogers and Dave Thomas are physicists, there are countless engineers here (I believe DGM is one, sheeplesandshills IIRC is one) I have a masters in fire science, plus many other relevant fields are represented here.

Gage has "landscape architects" on his "team".

Oh yeah, and not one single peer-reviewed paper between the entire lot of 'em showing NIST or Bazant wrong. I wonder why that is?
 
bill smith said:
I remember when Steven Jones announced that he was going to send the chips for independent analysis at the Boston lecture in december 2007 I was disappointed when he didn't. But eventually I worked out the reason and it was a a simple one and the correct way to go.

If Jones had sent his samples at that time to say Princeton or RJ Lee a simple call from the Whitehouse would have guaranteed that no nanothermite would be found. With such 'reputable' bodies rejecting Jones's findings the discovery would have been discredited and instantly dead in the water,
Click to expand...


LOL you send it out under a false name just asking what it is :rolleyes:

So he made the sensible decision to get as much scientific confirmation on the outside or 'alternative' scientific circuit as possible while conducting his detailed two- year study of the chips, resulting in the well known peer reviewed (and as yet uncontested) paper that has resulted in a capturing of more and more of the public imagination.[/QUOTE
Click to expand...

STOP LYING!!! the paper was only well known for being a joke and IT WAS NOT PEER REVIEWED.

It won't vbe so easy for these so-called reputable labs to casually reject his work now. They are free to try. They won't though.
Click to expand...

Why? nothing has changed. no lab ever needs or ever needed to know what it was or who sent it. This is a complete red herring

I hope Jones makes a big fuss and forces them to respond. I hope he does it soon.
Click to expand...

LOL, don't hold your breath:rolleyes:
Click to expand...
 
bill smith said:
They all seem to be 2001 or 2002 Tri. Surprising that nobody technical seems to be writing stuff to support the government story since then. Bar NIST of course who are to all intents and purposes the government.
Not much confidence out there any more I think. We will no doubt revisit the subject with the authors come the day.
Click to expand...

Not suprising that nothing recent. After the WTC collapses, that was a hot topic in engineering circles, so they wrote about it then.
 
triforcharity said:
Not suprising that nothing recent. After the WTC collapses, that was a hot topic in engineering circles, so they wrote about it then.
Click to expand...

On the contrary, the government story of the collapses is disputed left right and centre and yet no engineering firm of any kind is writing papers in support . It sticks out like a sore thumb.
 
bill smith said:
On the contrary, the government story of the collapses is disputed left right and centre and yet no engineering firm of any kind is writing papers in support . It sticks out like a sore thumb.
Click to expand...


If never once heard an Intelligent and/or Sane person dispute it..........
:cool:
 
bill smith said:
On the contrary, the government story of the collapses is disputed left right and centre and yet no engineering firm of any kind is writing papers in support . It sticks out like a sore thumb.
Click to expand...

There is NO legitimate dispute of the "government story". You and your little truther cult do not count as legitimate, no matter what you think.
 
Marokkaan said:
Primer paint? No it does not contain magnesium. So its not primer paint.

No you are lying there is no kaolin found.
Click to expand...
You are not listening - where have I said it's primer paint specifically tnemec red? I have stated that samples a-d are paint (not primer paint) and the sample that was subjected to MEK is tnemec red primer paint.

One of the incompetences of the paper is that in Fig 14 they never labelled all the peaks - they left out the Mg k-alpha peak at 1.26KeV.

picture.php


I showed that on 13th April 2009

I later showed that it is a match for tnemec red using Jones' own video where he has an EDX spectrum of tnemec red primer paint. See below.

picture.php


Now onto kaolinite. see here http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4659658&postcount=157 and here http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4607894&postcount=1694

I've shown that the most likely material that those hexagonal alumino-silicate platelets in the sample are kaolin. So you can't just scream "liar!" like a petulant child can you? No one has ever managed to rebut my findings - even Jones can't do it, he obfuscates and misleads on the issue. What say you now?

Yes you'll ignore it all - infact I bet you don't even bother to read the links.
 
Sunstealer said:
I've shown that the most likely material that those hexagonal alumino-silicate platelets in the sample are kaolin. So you can't just scream "liar!" like a petulant child can you? No one has ever managed to rebut my findings - even Jones can't do it, he obfuscates and misleads on the issue. What say you now?

Yes you'll ignore it all - infact I bet you don't even bother to read the links.
Click to expand...

Be fair Sunstealer, he is used to utoob and talkin like dis lolz either he iz 2 young or he iz 2 insane or 2 stoopid
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom