• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Continuation - 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Why was metallic debris found 8 miles from the
crash site of the plane that went down in Penn? They
said it went straight down and left a small hole in
the ground. If they found metallic debris from the
plane 8 miles away it was either shot down or a bomb
exploded in the plane

Here's two questions: Why don't you respond to people answering your other questions before you ask a new one? Is this just some kind of debate tactic?
 
I do not answer any questions about myself to any of you!! simple

Who's asking questions about you? All I want is you to acknowledge those who have taken the time to answer questions you pose before you go on and ask another question. Every single question you have asked so far can be easily explained or debunked if you would actually slow down, take a couple breaths, and listen. It seems to me you're not interested in answers, only questions.

We call that JAQing off. (JAQ Just Asking Questions) It's not polite.
 
Last edited:
and while you're at it...debunk that Marvin Bush is not George's brother.....

http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/911security.html

9/11 Security
Courtesy of Marvin Bush

Marvin P. Bush, the president’s younger brother, was a principal in a company called Securacom that provided security for the World Trade Center, United Airlines, and Dulles International Airport. The company, Burns noted, was backed by KuwAm, a Kuwaiti-American investment firm on whose board Marvin Burns also served. [Utne]
According to its present CEO, Barry McDaniel, the company had an ongoing contract to handle security at the World Trade Center "up to the day the buildings fell down."

The company lists as government clients "the U.S. Army, U.S. Navy, U.S Air force, and the Department of Justice," in projects that "often require state-of-the-art security solutions for classified or high-risk government sites."
 
The big problem with thermite solution is that thermite is Very Bright while it is burning.

Because it is generating such high temperatures and energies, a massive release of light is unavoidable.

The Swiss Cheese metal is produced after the building collapses. To the untrained eye, and without a chemical analysis, it WOULD look like some sort of thermite had done it.

If it were thermite it would have to be set off well before impact or after the building collapses.

Not only is thermite very bright it produces a LOT of smoke. Once the planes tore through the skin of the building any burning thermite would be visible.

The whole building would have filled with smoke if the thermite was set off before the planes hit, this would have been a good thing, since they would be forced to evacuate.

The swiss cheese metal and George W. Bush's paranoia made it look like something like thermite was used.

Too much of Building 7 was destroyed (no evidence retained to be very useful). People setting fires all over the place inside the building could have brought it down. Without evidence a thorough and independent investigation that questions the principles (people involved) on why it may have been (conventionally) sabotaged to fail.

The Building was not a normal building, it was built around a transformer station.

It had some instability that knowledgeable people could have exploited when using fires to collapse the building. I would lean toward people setting fires in the building, but again the thermite would advertise itself.
 
Last edited:
Ok watch the video and "debunk it"...I'm waiting.....


Ok take that video, and any other video or any other materials you wish, and convince any university science faculty, university history faculty, insurance company, law enforcement agency, peer reviewed scientific journal, engineering firm, or influential news editor, in any nation, to believe your claims and take up your cause...I'm waiting.....been waiting for over five years now.

That has not happened.

If you're interested in the reason it has not happened, that reason is because you are wrong and the people and organizations I've listed are all quite capable of determining that you are wrong, and have done so already or will do so as soon as they examine your claims. This will not change in the future, because the claims you are now making will remain wrong in the future.

Respectfully,
Myriad
 
and while you're at it...debunk that Marvin Bush is not George's brother.....

http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/911security.html

9/11 Security
Courtesy of Marvin Bush

Marvin P. Bush, the president’s younger brother, was a principal in a company called Securacom that provided security for the World Trade Center, United Airlines, and Dulles International Airport. The company, Burns noted, was backed by KuwAm, a Kuwaiti-American investment firm on whose board Marvin Burns also served. [Utne]
According to its present CEO, Barry McDaniel, the company had an ongoing contract to handle security at the World Trade Center "up to the day the buildings fell down."

The company lists as government clients "the U.S. Army, U.S. Navy, U.S Air force, and the Department of Justice," in projects that "often require state-of-the-art security solutions for classified or high-risk government sites."

Securacom got off light as far as being questioned. It also shouldn't have been able to get those contracts because of it associates. This is positively a case of political corruption, but it may not have anything to do with the conspiracy.

Because of the secrecy that allowed W to do so many Illegal things, it also meant that normal communications were not possible between government entities, they started acting like they had something to hide even when they didn't.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom