• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Continuation - 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
tmd2_1 said:
Terrific..yet you find the need to reply to me.
Click to expand...

You are amusing,that's why. No other reason. We know that you will never alter your dogmatic view of these matters. How do you ever hope to have a debate if you won't answer questions? If there ever was a new enquiry involving truthers it would be a waste of time. I can see a line of truthers turning up to say 'Shan't!' when asked a question.
 
Last edited:
tmd2_1 said:
Say what you want...then it doesn't matter I could say I have a ph.d in physics from MIT, and what would it matter?..
Click to expand...

We have already twigged that you have not studied physics. Tell me what you did study,I'll believe you.
 
dafydd said:
You are amusing,that's why. No other reason. We know that you will never alter your dogmatic view of these matters. How do you ever hope to have a debate if you won't answer questions? If there ever was an new enquiry involving truthers it would be a waste of time. I can see a line of truthers turning up to say 'Shan't!' when asked a question.
Click to expand...

what haven't i answered besides my qualifications? By the way how'd I do on that little test? Something tells me I would have heard about it if I was wrong.
 
Where's your video, tmd? The one that shows a massive steel column being subjected to the violence of a 757 impact at 500mph, then burn the surrounding area with a massive fire for an hour - only to have the attached explosives work without issue?

Hell, I've been waiting for that since page 1!
 
tmd2_1 said:
what haven't i answered besides my qualifications? By the way how'd I do on that little test? Something tells me I would have heard about it if I was wrong.
Click to expand...

What test? You didn't answer this. What is your full theory about the events on 911? Reading between the lines of your posts it seems that you are a CD truther. How were the explosives smuggled in,who smuggled them,why didn't anyone ,notice a building being rigged with tons of explosives.how did the explosives survive the plane crashes in order to be detonated hours later,did the NYFD sacrifice it's own men as part of the plan,did the mayor know about it and play along.......tiny little details like that.
 
dafydd said:
What test? You didn't answer this. What is your full theory about the events on 911? Reading between the lines of your posts it seems that you are a CD truther. How were the explosives smuggled in,who smuggled the,why didn't anyone notice a building being rigged with tons of explosives.how did the explosives survive the plane crashes in order to be detonated hours later,did the NYFD sacrifice it's own men as part of the plan,did the mayor know about it and play along.......tiny little details like that.
Click to expand...

You know when who asked what is Molten steel or not...I got it right (now I'm sure)...this right here just proves what you are about...you know what I was asking...it proves what you are all about (most of you anyway) Nothing is good enough evidence...nothing at all...yet the FBI says they have no hard evidence against Bin laden, and that's ok. I hope this thread never goes away, and this post in particular...it clearly shows what you guys are all about I'll be sure to show it to as many people as possible.
 
Last edited:
tmd2_1 said:
You know when who asked what is Molten steel or not...I got it right (now I'm sure)...this right here just proves what you are about...you know what I was asking...it proves what you are all about (most of you anyway) Nothing is good enough evidence...nothing at all...yet the FBI says they have no hard evidence against Bin laden, and that's ok. I hope this thread never goes away, and this post in particular...it clearly shows what you guys are all about I'll be sure to show it to as many people as possible.
Click to expand...

OK, suppose you're right. WHOO HOOO!! You had a 1 in 4 shot. Here's a cookie.

How about the other question he posed?

What's your full theory on the day's events?
 
NoahFence said:
OK, suppose you're right. WHOO HOOO!! You had a 1 in 4 shot. Here's a cookie.

How about the other question he posed?

What's your full theory on the day's events?
Click to expand...

See post number 5 and the numerous posts I made that day...I feel no need to post on this forum anymore....you have been exposed for what you really are.
 
tmd2_1 said:
You know when who asked what is Molten steel or not...I got it right (now I'm sure)...this right here just proves what you are about...you know what I was asking...it proves what you are all about (most of you anyway) Nothing is good enough evidence...nothing at all...yet the FBI says they have no hard evidence against Bin laden, and that's ok. I hope this thread never goes away, and this post in particular...it clearly shows what you guys are all about I'll be sure to show it to as many people as possible.
Click to expand...

You do realize that this is a relatively obscure website. Take your evidence to the authorities. Like all truthers you have an over inflated sense of your own importance
 
tmd2_1 said:
I believe the last not 100% sure though...you're missing the point...one more time...what those witnesses saw or did not see is not important to whether he lied or not...he said there were no witnesses he knows of that said they saw it...a clear lie....There were witnesses who said they actually saw beams melting...see the second guy in this video (when they start showing witnesses). What else would that be?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fs_ogSbQFbM
Click to expand...

You find it surprising that something melts in a fire? It's an odd world,Trutherland. It was the last,well done but I'm afraid that doesn't help. Those are the first images that come up on Google. I realize that sulphur on beams is far more important than the questions I asked,after all the whole case stands or falls on that crucial point.
 
tmd2_1 said:
See post number 5 and the numerous posts I made that day...I feel no need to post on this forum anymore....you have been exposed for what you really are.
Click to expand...

You are the umpteenth truther to turn tail and run when your silly arguments are exposed. You all claim victory when you chicken out,that is so funny.
 
Last edited:
tmd2_1 said:
See post number 5 and the numerous posts I made that day...I feel no need to post on this forum anymore....you have been exposed for what you really are.
Click to expand...

lol!!

Post 5:
This is my first post, and I will certainly try not to break any rules, if I do I apologize in advance, and will change anything that needs to be. I found your question while searching and found it very interesting. I believe I can answer or at least have plausible explanations. I will start with the 2nd of your questions. The most likely scenario for what happened that day, would be something to the affect...that the upper echelon of the Bush administration planned what happened at the pentagon. Having war game scenarios and test hijackings etc...this way it would confuse those who might normally intercept such a hijacking. Hence Norman Mineta's testimony. The Zionist/elites...whatever you want to call them...had something much more sinister in mind...they wanted carte blanche, a blank check to do what they wanted in the middle east ...restrict civil liberties etc... They took advantage of what they knew would be a very confusing time for those who would normally intercept the plane and struck. In regards to how it was "screwed" up...it was really quite the opposite. I believe the 4th plane was headed for building 7...the two towers had to fall to get a clear shot at it. But our fighters were able to scramble and the plane was shot down. I think even those who admittedly support the official story have some doubts as to whether that plane was shot down or not. Obviously Larry Silverstein would be a part of the plot to take the towers down...while using the pentagon in essence as "cover". The first question you have...I'm not sure if this is a suitable answer, but could not the explosives have been planted below the impact zone? Even if they were at the impact zone it would only cause a greater explosion, and perhaps the building to drop earlier..I'm sure exactly when the building dropped really was not that important. As far as proving it could survive a plane impact. I'm not sure I could do that... I would need lots of time and money to conduct experiments, to anything I could come up..I have not found any that someone else did. But as stated previously I'm not sure that it is necessary, thermite cutter charges are the most likely thing to have been used, and it would not matter if some went off early.
Click to expand...



??

You really think, with all those bolded assumptions backed up with zero evidence, that you answered the OP? REALLY?

Kiddo - you're bad at this.


As far as the explosives being below the impact zone - is it physically possible? Sure! But they didn't contribute to the collapse. The collapse started at the impact zone.
 
tmd2_1 said:
Say what you want...then it doesn't matter I could say I have a ph.d in physics from MIT, and what would it matter?..You can't prove it one way or the other so why say anything....still waiting for your video by the way.
Click to expand...
I think you have very few qualifications. Do you know why I think that? It's the way you write. It's the way you format your posts. It's the way in which you misunderstand clearly written posts. It's the way that you ignore and hand wave away questions that show you up. It's the way that none of your posts have any depth to them. It's the way that none of your posts show any greater understanding of any of the subjects that are applicable to 9/11. It's the way you repeat what you've read and have no thoughts of your own. It's the way you cling to a single line over and over and over again when it adds nothing to the debate.

You won't find me commentating on tall building design or fire-fighting, I've no experience in them so I keep quiet and learn from others who do have that experience. It's very easy to tell if someone has a clue about a subject or not.

Yes you could post that you had a PhD in physics, but we know you don't because you've been asked to do simple maths and shirked away from it. A PhD in physics wouldn't. See how it works?
 
NoahFence said:
lol!!

Post 5:




??

You really think, with all those bolded assumptions backed up with zero evidence, that you answered the OP? REALLY?

Kiddo - you're bad at this.


As far as the explosives being below the impact zone - is it physically possible? Sure! But they didn't contribute to the collapse. The collapse started at the impact zone.
Click to expand...

He thinks that farrago of nonsense is a full theory. Dear me.
 
Sunstealer said:
I think you have very few qualifications. Do you know why I think that? It's the way you write. It's the way you format your posts. It's the way in which you misunderstand clearly written posts. It's the way that you ignore and hand wave away questions that show you up. It's the way that none of your posts have any depth to them. It's the way that none of your posts show any greater understanding of any of the subjects that are applicable to 9/11. It's the way you repeat what you've read and have no thoughts of your own. It's the way you cling to a single line over and over and over again when it adds nothing to the debate.

You won't find me commentating on tall building design or fire-fighting, I've no experience in them so I keep quiet and learn from others who do have that experience. It's very easy to tell if someone has a clue about a subject or not.

Yes you could post that you had a PhD in physics, but we know you don't because you've been asked to do simple maths and shirked away from it. A PhD in physics wouldn't. See how it works?
Click to expand...

It's hard to get a Phd when you're fifteen years old and in your parents basement.
 
Said in a Homer Simpson whisper "Daffyd - next time you put up photos of liquid metals make sure they are not labelled alu.jpg, steel.jpg etc" ;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom