• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

WTC dust

Status
Not open for further replies.
WTC Dust said:
I would have given a reasoned response had your message included anything of value.
Click to expand...
Well it does have value in that you made a claim, "no wake=no impact", yet refuse to support that claim by showing what you're refering to in the bullet impact video you linked to. A common tactic used by 911 truthers is to baselessly hand wave away others questions when they know the answers will expose their claim as being invalid.

I wonder how well it works in your profession when submitting papers for peer review?

BTW, I did check out your blog and it's apperant you've never applied science to your 911 claims, all the blog consists of is a few pictures, a few baseless claims and your non-applicable credentials.

If it walks like an ideologue and talks like an ideologue then it's an ideologue.
 
I'm glad you all are reading what I write because it means that you're hearing the truth for the very first time.

19 Arabs didn't hijack airplanes on 9/11, and even if they did, it doesn't matter in terms of what destroyed the WTC.

The WTC was brought down precipitously, but each building was damaged before it was brought down. WTC 7 was fuming heavily for >10 hours before the final poofing. WTC 1 was cooking for 102 minutes before it went POOF. WTC 2 was only going for 56 minutes before the POOF.

I have obtained some WTC dust, likely from WTC 2, from a little nook in my home near Ground Zero. An incredible find. I'm kicking myself for not finding it earlier, but I did find it at last. And since finding it, my understanding of what became of the buildings has rocketed skyward.

You haven't heard it before, but you're hearing it here. Years from now you might remember I told you about it, but that's not important. What's important is that processes that can produce metallic foam are implicated in the destruction of the WTC.

Newtons Bit said:
But someone on the internet is wrong (and possibly insane)!
Click to expand...
 

Attachments

  • wtc and dust piece.jpg
    wtc and dust piece.jpg
    56.2 KB · Views: 1
WTC Dust said:
The smell was unlike anything I've ever smelled before, and it could be smelled as far as a mile or so away (FOR MONTHS).
Click to expand...
So why didn't you approach this mystery as a scientist?

The smell was there for months and you never thought to take air samples?

Sounds like the smell is nothing but a way for you to justify your ideological view of 911.
 
Translate the wake of a boat into the 3 dimensions of air. There you go. The bigger the boat, or the faster the boat, the bigger the wake. You really need to think hard, but it will come to you. Air is largely invisible, but not the air around the WTC. It was filled with particles that would have been disturbed had a wake flowed in the area.

sylvan8798 said:
Can't you suggest some dimensions in terms of diameter, length, shape, etc? Is it shaped in cross section like a huge cylinder? a cone? a plane? Does it get broader farther away from the plane?
Click to expand...
 
WTC Dust said:
Why would you say the exact opposite of what I said?

Deliberate ignorance is a common tactic. I'm watching you.
Click to expand...

You said:-

'' The smell I'm talking about lasted for a very long time, months, as did the fume cloud coming from Ground Zero ''.

At the very least unclear. I take it then that the smell did emanate from the fumes.
 
Not really. Other hijackings leave behind much more evidence.

Physical evidence: Every single hijacking ends up with a plane.
Documentary evidence: Most hijackings have pictures of the hijackers on the plane or boarding the plane. Among other types of documentary evidence.
Eyewitness evidence: You know. People who stamped Atta's boarding pass. Etc. Hijackings leave behind a wake of witnesses to them.

I'd like to see some of this evidence. NOT just repeated stories alone, because stories are just stories.

Dash80 said:
You haven't found a damn thing, your theories only make sense to someone with too many loose screws... Like Judy.

These is ample evidence of hijackers and plane crashes. You ignore it because you can't make any of it fit your delusions. NOW PLEASE ANSWER MY QUESTIONS concerning 2 airlines confirming the loss of their aircraft and 250+ passengers!
Click to expand...
 
WTC Dust said:
The WTC was brought down precipitously, but each building was damaged before it was brought down. WTC 7 was fuming heavily for >10 hours before the final poofing. WTC 1 was cooking for 102 minutes before it went POOF. WTC 2 was only going for 56 minutes before the POOF.
Click to expand...
Oh now you admit they were damaged! Hmm I wonder what could have caused the immense structural damage and uncontrolled fires in the twins... Zoinks Scoob what a mystery!
 
The fumes and the smell were coincident in time and place.

bill smith said:
You said:-

'' The smell I'm talking about lasted for a very long time, months, as did the fume cloud coming from Ground Zero ''.

At the very least unclear. I take it then that the smell did emanate from the fumes.
Click to expand...
 
I went to Ground Zero on Day 3, looking for samples.

Eventually, I found samples.

Give me a break, please. I came to JREF talking about my samples. I'm very proud to have discovered them.

Porkpie Hat said:
So why didn't you approach this mystery as a scientist?

The smell was there for months and you never thought to take air samples?

Sounds like the smell is nothing but a way for you to justify your ideological view of 911.
Click to expand...
 
WTC Dust said:
Not really. Other hijackings leave behind much more evidence.

Physical evidence: Every single hijacking ends up with a plane.
Documentary evidence: Most hijackings have pictures of the hijackers on the plane or boarding the plane. Among other types of documentary evidence.
Eyewitness evidence: You know. People who stamped Atta's boarding pass. Etc. Hijackings leave behind a wake of witnesses to them.

I'd like to see some of this evidence. NOT just repeated stories alone, because stories are just stories.
Click to expand...
Your required evidence was present on 9/11, not our fault that you chose to pretend it wasn't.

You STILL haven't answered my questions.
 
Last edited:
If you thought all that other stuff I've been saying was wild, wait until you hear the NEXT thing I'm pulling out! Woooot. This will be controversial. I might get in trouble.
 
WTC Dust said:
If you thought all that other stuff I've been saying was wild, wait until you hear the NEXT thing I'm pulling out! Woooot. This will be controversial. I might get in trouble.
Click to expand...
Lovely, more woo. I'm looking forward to this, really I am.
 
WTC Dust said:
Do you know very much about biochemistry?
If not, how do you think it is possible to frustrate me in my own field?
Pardon me if I think you a bit impudent, but you may be right.

Go ahead. Try and frustrate me in matters related to biochemistry. Go!
Click to expand...



Go back and read, think about, and respond to this post:


TheRedWorm said:
It's as bad as, if not worse than the 'science' creationists are 'conducting'. Seriously, You probably can't see this because the subject is way too close and way to personal to you, but just step back. Really think about the analogy that I used. I chose it for a very specific reason, can you think of why?
Click to expand...

If you need a hint, just ask.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom