I mean generally speaking you would think that most of the criminals support network would have to be in relatively close proximity. Maybe that's a bad assumption on my part.
Merged Continuation - 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread
- Thread starter Cuddles
- Start date
- Status
I mean generally speaking you would think that most of the criminals support network would have to be in relatively close proximity. Maybe that's a bad assumption on my part.
Craig4
Penultimate Amazing
Something of a reoccurring theme for you isn't it?
Grizzly Bear
このマスクに&#
- Joined
- May 30, 2008
- Messages
- 7,963
I've seen his videos before...
The WTC 7 sample wasn't even melted, it was corroded. The ingredients for the eutectic reaction were present in the debris pile and don't require themite to be present. While he gets a few extra points for not simply blowing smoke, his experiment had nothing to do with what the sample experienced.
The second one also gets an "E' for effort. He manages to cut the darn thing. He only needs to go a few steps further and offer the feasibility of implementation, and then prove it was there. Which will be far more difficult for him since the evidence weighs heavily in favor of a combination of impact damage and fire, and the lower structure's inability to absorb the impact of the falling upper sections. All of which have been pretty thoroughly investigated and shown to be the reality
Last edited:
Do me a favor....prove him wrong by experiment, Ryan Mackey even said NIST (pg 102) should run tests...they didn't. Cole did, so I will wait for your video.
Yeah...you figured me out....another brilliant reply I will say.
Grizzly Bear
このマスクに&#
- Joined
- May 30, 2008
- Messages
- 7,963
His experiment doesn't replicate the observed results. Exactly what am I supposed to disprove from him?
BStrong
Penultimate Amazing
The material writes itself.
Watch this video (all of it)...he tells you what to disprove...and he tells why he is running the test...why both Ryan Mackey and Fred Greening said there should be more tests.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VvQDFV1HINw&feature=channel_video_title
You know there should be more well thought out replies like this one. Really getting to the heart of the arguments, making good points based in all kinds of logic and reason. I'd say if there were more replies like this there wouldn't be a single truther left.
Craig4
Penultimate Amazing
I did. It fails to tie the people in the van to the attacks. No explosives, no documents, nothing. Do you perhaps think that before you accuse people of mass murder you should do a little due diligence and provide evidence of a connection to the crime?
Craig4
Penultimate Amazing
Get a grip. You've turned a massive human tragedy into a meaningless hobby. This is a game for you. It's good that you should suffer a social consequence.
BStrong
Penultimate Amazing
The points have already been made, but truther logic rejects facts for feelings.
It's no coincidence that religious fundementalists and truthers are both difficult to communicate with wrt their beliefs - they are "faith" based, not fact based belief systems.
There's not much else I can do...I mean they admit themselves they were their to document the event. Something tells whatever I post will "fail" as you like to put it. There's always some other reason, anything that goes against your dogma can't possibly be true.
Oh I have a grip...you are the one who needs one. 3000 people died..this is no game, far from it...if seeking the truth in everything I do is a hobby then yes I will agree with you.
Craig4
Penultimate Amazing
Then why is the quality of your work so poor? If you weren't treating this a game your product wouldn't be so laughably bad.
Yeah i'm difficult to communicate with. The members of this forum...seem to seek nothing more then to ridicule and disrespect anyone who dares to disagree, and present evidence contrary to their dogma.
Again another brilliant reply...way to have a stunning rebuttal.
Craig4
Penultimate Amazing
You've provided no evidence. You've not tied the 60 arrested Israeli agents to 9/11. You've not tied the Israelis in the van to 9/11 (beyond taking pictures which thousands of people were doing in New Jersey that day). You haven't even got to the point where I could dismiss your evidence because you haven't presented any.
Last edited:
Believe what you want to believe...it's all in that video..and it would take you about 15 seconds to find more videos of the subject. I would post them...but I know what your response will be. If you really want to you can find them yourself.
- Status