• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

WTC dust

Status
Not open for further replies.
Dunno. There is a rumor that Judy Wood spent six years in a coma but I don't think there is any evidence that it is true.
 
twinstead said:
I'm looking all through this subforum and I can't find anywhere where anybody claimed the planes stayed intact when they hit the steel columns. WTC Dust can you help me with this?
Click to expand...

Correct me if I am wrong,but isn't Dusty the one who thought that the crew in the plane that crashed into the Empire State Building survived the crash and calmly caught the lift to the ground floor? That plane ploughed through the buiding and one of it's engines killed some people in the building next door. It was a smaller plane that those invoved in 911. Dusty's Phd did not include studying kinetic energy.
 
Last edited:
dtugg said:
It is a biomedical degree. She really isn't lying about that. Of course, that doesn't matter. Her degree isn't even in a relevent field. Even if it was, it wouldn't matter. Her hero, Judy Wood, has a doctorate in engineering.
Click to expand...

It doesn't matter if you have credentials in a relevant field if your claim is ill-defined, unphysical, and flatly contradicts observation, which is the case with poor crazy Ms. Wood. In this thread as well as others, her claims have been shown absurd on all these counts.

If you have credentials in an irrelevant field, and your claims are ill-defined, unphysical, and flatly contradict observation, and furthermore attempt to draw support from somebody else's absurdities, well,... you have this thread. An exercise in Internet narcissism that has exactly the same real-world impact as the ravings of the disheveled guy arguing with empty air near the dumpster behind the 7-11.
 
Here's Dusty!!

Tracy2.jpg
 
deleted...

Yeah, Craig.

You're probably right.

Fine line between being a wit & a half-wit...
 
Last edited:
This means that you're not aware of the science I've been conducting.

TheRedWorm said:
Let me put it to you this way, Dusty:

What you are doing, is the equivalent of a creationist.

What you are doing, is the same as someone telling you that not only is evolution an obvious hoax, but people aren't comprised of cells, but rather plasma (the ionized gas kind).
Click to expand...
 
Occam's razor is why I'm here.

Remember that strange fire I kept smelling day after day for many months?
Well, during those months, it was quite rainy and cold, and the fire fighters never stopped working to stop the fuming. I saw them. They were working constantly. And the strange fire refused to go out.

And the smell. The theory that qualifies under Occam's razor must account for this strange, awful, unique smell.

Occam's razor doesn't say the simplest explanation is the likeliest one. It says that the simplest explanation THAT EXPLAINS ALL THE DATA is the likeliest one. If your theory doesn't account for my primary observations of the aftermath, it's the wrong theory, no matter how simple it is.

chipmunk stew said:
Ah yes, the simple truths of faked plane crashes, foamified steel, mysterious beam weapons...

Occam's razor has never been so sharp.
Click to expand...
 
WTC Dust said:
Occam's razor doesn't say the simplest explanation is the likeliest one. It says that the simplest explanation THAT EXPLAINS ALL THE DATA is the likeliest one. If your theory doesn't account for my primary observations of the aftermath, it's the wrong theory, no matter how simple it is.
Click to expand...
Occam's razor doesn't say that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom