If I had told the opposite story about my uncle, if instead I said my uncle had made a ton of money by doing Amway for 4 years and retired early, I have a feeling that Icerat wouldn't be asking for any evidence.
If I had told the opposite story about my uncle, if instead I said my uncle had made a ton of money by doing Amway for 4 years and retired early, I have a feeling that Icerat wouldn't be asking for any evidence.
The most important difference between buyers club points and Amway points is nobody is telling you that you’re going to be able to make a living by accumulating enough points from your grocery store. All you’re doing is saving a few dollars on fresh fruit, or whatever the product is, you’re not “building a business”.
It seems like a lot of your arguments depend on changing definitions. Amway points are a commission structure when you want to tout it as an amazing business opportunity, but it’s just a “buyers club” incentive when the business opportunity fails.
If XS could compete with Red Bull in the real world, do you think 1/3rd owner Mr. Duncan would be in bankruptcy?
And yet nobody can seem to find this good Amway where people are not soaked for whatever they can afford (and sometimes can’t afford) in motivational CD’s, books and meetings and where people who enter the program stand a better than even chance of making a decent income at it. If this fantasy Amway exists, maybe you need to provide evidence of it.
Not at all a comparable analogy.
If I take a job in commission-only sales with no draw (and I have spent years living on a compensation program like that) it’s very relevant to learn that 99.9% of the people taking that position don’t hit the commission, and most of those that do only earn token commissions.
Look, “immersion courses” where the whole family travels for a month to France or Spain cost money. And the truth is Amway eats up spare time, it doesn’t create it.
Then show us some evidence. I find your anecdotes unconvincing.
“Cahsflow problems” means you don’t have the income to support your basic needs plus your debt, but often the term is used as an excuse to cover bad money-management.
(1) how do you know?The difference is Bill Gates, John McEnroe and others didn’t get into their business expressly for the purpose of freeing up time to spend with their families.
I think that if you want to tout a guys credentials as part of your argument then it's certainly legitimate to look at what those credentials are, don't you?
I've supplied you with the names of thousands. How many have you contacted? Or here's one. Go look up Walter Bass in Michigan. He died in the earlier 80s. He was recognized as a new Founders Emerald in the late 90s. How'd he do that exactly?
What evidence have you shown and what claims have you proven?
What specific claims have we/I made that you want evidence for?
Personally I think part of the evidence here is the multitude of people who have come forward with their stories. Again, I've personally been involved and seen information on tools profit with my own eyes. Others here have been involved in various capacities. You admittedly have a low level of success in amway and aren't in a position to have personal knowledge about high level profits. What else is there to say other than caveat emptor?
Sorry if I was misunderstood but I wasn't asking for evidence of your uncle's story. That kind of thing happens, I don't think there's any argument about that. The overly-materialistic approach you describe is (was?) particularly widespread in the group Newton Trino has experience with.
One thing though - except possibile brief period in the early 80s, if you're uncle was with Amway in the US, he wasn't buying tapes and books from Amway, as they don't sell them. They were probably from a 3rd party company.
Source: http://mybroadband.co.za/vb/archive/index.php/t-44786.html
My wife got a call this Monday from a friend of her that wants her to go with to a "business opportunity". The Friend didn't say what about the "business opportunity". I told her to cancel ... no way I'm going.
How I hate this network 21/Amway etc craptastic "business opportunity "
A friend of mine told me about this "business opportunity" 4 years ago. Didn't tell me what about, but I trust him. Went to the meeting. 2 Hours of crap. I want the 2 hours of my life back. They try to tell you how bad your work is, and how your job suck. How they will make you a million.
Few months later he invited myself and the wife to a presentation thing. Was at carnival city. Paid frieking R80 per head to get in. It was Amway again. Now they told everyone how this 1 couple is going to Disney world. I mean 1 couple, out of probably thousand + people there. And its only the highest ranking person in the pyramid scheme.
...
N21 is Amway. Don't let anyone try and bulldust that it isn't. Think of it this way - Amway is a pyramid scheme given some legitimacy by dancing around the definitions of ponzi scheme. What has happened is some guy at the top has created his own pyramid and called it network 21. The scheme makes money for the peeps at the top by selling motivational material to its own structures, or by making money out of the shipping charges.
I suppose there is nothing really wrong with the products but they are most certainly not cheap.
They lie to you - it is always a business opportunity and the person calling you could never do justice to the concept so come along to the meeting. At the meeting no mention will be made of Amway until the end and then it'll be glossed over. They'll talk about living off an asset - what asset? There is absolutely no capital whatsoever. They tell you that you can retire but if you don't participate your membership terminates. Sorry, I'd rather buy houses.
Source: http://www.amquix.info/feedback/feedback_jul07.html
My wife and I were in Network 21 (founded by Jim & Nancy Dornan) a few years back, and we too were duped by the cheap glamour and promise of a better life. We were in for about 3 years, and on all the required education materials from the get-go -- tapes, books, meetings, as per usual -- to the tune of $3,500 per year. But in all that time we signed up, count them, 2 people. "2 people?! That pathetic!" And yes it is... but my problem was from day-1 was this nagging little voice
in my head -- the one telling me I can't commit to lying to my friends and perfect strangers:
"It's not Amway"
"10-15 hours per week tops"
"$200 is all it'll ever cost"
"A sure-fire vehicle to financial security & freedom"
Edited by Locknar:<SNIP>, breach of rule 4.
Anyway enough about me... Scott after reading the feedback I noticed a common phrase used by every Amquix pollyanna who makes a comment on
this website:
Source: http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles/comment/nework21.htm
Network 21 is one of the "motivational organisations" for Amway. My experience with their distributors is that they turn up for the plan showing with a professional salesman from Network 21 who runs the presentation. Any questions about Amway are answered with lies. I was told several times in the last session I endured that they had a casual relationship with Amway (the words used were "Amway is one of our suppliers") but the real link was continually denied. This is symmetrical with the way that Amway employees lie about their knowledge of the motivational organisations like Network 21 and International Dreambuilders.
I cited his credentials because you claimed he was only making money because he learned how to promote "self help" materials. Clearly that's not the case.
Please provide some evidence he is unqualified for his position with CBS.
Re the masters in psych, behavioural economics is a huge and growing field. There's even a Journal of Economic Psychology. I frankly am quite surprised that you think psychology and economics/finance is a weird combination.
So the problem with that group is that it was overly materialistic?
Can you elaborate on how that distinguishes it from other groups?
Do you really think the important issue here is where the tapes and books came from? It seems to be the salient issue here is the guy was pitched on a business opportunity, and instead was bled dry on the inspirational materials. Who actually produced the materials seems irrelevant, they were still sold to him by his upline.

Something I found at one of Icerat’s websites. A description of life at Amway:
So in normal life I buy a water treatment system when I decide I need one, which so far means I have a brita filter I run tap water through. I buy pots and pans when I decide I need new ones, which last time I did that was sometime before I got married so sometime between 10 and 15 years ago and they’re still fine. But if I join Amway and work hard at the system, I can get high-pressure phone calls from my upline telling me to buy stuff now so I can make some arbitrary goal in “building my business”.
Keep in mind the context of this quote isn’t even being critical of Amway. It’s just describing how it goes.
Not quite what I claimed. I said he learned self-promotion from Amway, that he saw the money went to the person selling the materials. I'm sure he still would have made a living if he hadn't learned that.
So is this guy involved in behavioral economics or economic psychology? Are these disciplines useful in managing other people's money? Or are they primarily involved in marketing?
So this is "life a Amway", when in that same thread various IBOs are decrying that practice. Nobody there supported it.
So why would you use it as an example of how Amway works, when all these people working with Amway say it's dumb?
Keep in mind that you either misread or are being deliberately misleading. You're right that it's not being critical of Amway per se - but the "context" is highly critical of that practice.
Right. So he made money without selling materials. Some decades after leaving Amway he wrote a book and made money from that. He also wrote a column explaining what he learned out of Amway (which wasn't to write books)
all of the above, plus of course giving advice isn't just about managing other people's money.
No, it's just one of several issues.
Well for a start a lot of people (myself included) find that approach incredibly crass and vulgar. It has the additional problem of promoting an "all or nothing" type of view, as if making a few extra hundred bucks a month for a kid's piano lessons by holding make-up parties isn't a worthy goal...
This then inevitable leads to all sorts of other problems. For example most of the 3rd party "tools" are not relevant to someone with that goal. So first you're alienating folk like me. Then you're pressuring people to buy stuff they don't need in order to try and motivate them to work towards a goal they don't want - which is a pretty predictable recipe for ending up with a bunch of people who've spent a lot of money and are understandably p***ed off.
The ethics and morality of it aside, it's a pretty dumb way to create a long term successful business, too.
Sorry but you seem to be contradicting yourself here. You're saying that where the tapes and books came from isn't important, the important bit is where they came from?![]()
For starters, "all these people" seem to be one person, you. "IBOfightback" is one of your handles, isn't it? Others seem to affirm the practice.
I'm not sure I understand what you're saying. Certainly he's made money in his career, and he's sold books. I fail to see which assertions of mine you are refuting here.
Mycroft said:The lessons he took away are the lessons that make his career today; how to be wealth guru. He purchased the tools, went to the meetings, and quickly understood that the people making the money were the ones selling the tools and holding the meetings. So he left Amway, and is now the author of several self-help books and is able to market himself very well.
Given that he seems to be busy promoting his books, working as a columnist and talking head, running a business and continuing his education in psychology, I find the assertion that he's also doing work in the fields of behavioral economics and economic psychology a dubious claim that requires evidence.
Stop.
Realistically, if that's all someone wants then a part time job even at low wage gets you there. Minimum wage just one day a week comes to about $250 a month. That's with nothing to buy, no meetings to attend, no points system to track, and no necessity of annoying your friends and family selling vitamins and soaps.
I would agree, which is why Amway is not a good business model.
I don't see a significant difference between the tapes, books and other materials being produced by Amway directly or being produced by a private company started by the Diamond pin. My understanding is that they are typically produced and sold by the Diamond, correct?