• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

WTC dust

Status
Not open for further replies.
WTC Dust said:
Just do it so we know we are talking about the same thing. Sheesh! It's not that hard.
Click to expand...

No.
You were given what you asked for & now pretend you weren't. Yeah, its just a hundred yard walk & 2 minutes work but when you've shown you won't accept anything that shows your fantasy to be wrong, why should I bother?
 
WTC Dust said:
When I first began reading your message, I thought that you were being polite. By the time I got to the end of it, I had changed my mind.

I didn't come here to convince anyone of anything. Why would I do that here? You aren't seriously researching 9/11, most of you. I came here for a debunking, and am quite interested in it.

I don't need a debunking of the energy weapon theory, because it isn't my theory. I don't need a debunking of the no plane people, because I'm a no hijackings person.

I found a good amount of WTC dust. It is in the form of a metallic foam.
This is my discovery. Nobody has touched it yet, except for to suggest fatal contamination without really backing it up and to suggest (I'm guessing) fakery in my magnetism demonstration without really back it up either.

Pretty sad case, for a set of supposed premier debunkers.
Click to expand...

Boring. What is it exactly that you're expecting anybody to debunk?

You make a claim that you've found some dust that allegedly comes from one or both WTCs. You further claim that it takes the form of a metallic foam.

So. what.
 
WTC Dust said:
You won't hear me saying any of that bullpie.

But you will hear me say: THERE WERE NO HIJACKINGS on 9/11.

Talking about airplanes is a waste of time when there weren't even any hijackings.
Click to expand...


Piece Of Foam And A Smell Convinces Biologist
Outer Space Beam Caused Towers’ Collapse
And Blindness.
​
 
WTC Dust said:
First, it's important to establish that a wake follows an airplane.
Click to expand...
Well, no.
Amazing that anyone could deny this. So, if you would like to do some calculations, I'll review them.
Click to expand...
So, in other words, you have no idea how to do them.
You're not denying that every airplane flying through the sky is followed by a wake, are you?
Click to expand...
The wake isn't being dragged along with the plane. You really don't have any idea what you are saying.
 
It's boring because the official story was wrong 10 years ago.
(And I'm looking for the weapon that destroyed the WTC, not interested in consipracy
theories, official or otherwise.)

DGM said:
By far your most telling post to date.

So, is it about the excitement of the explanation or the validity?
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
WTC Dust said:
It's boring because the official story was wrong 10 years ago.
(And I'm looking for the weapon that destroyed the WTC, not interested in consipracy
theories, official or otherwise.)
Click to expand...
Where are you looking? I mean, like are you looking about in actual places on the earth? Or is "looking" a metaphor?
 
WTC Dust said:
... Video evidence showing a lack of plane debris and ...
Click to expand...
A lie. Why do you post lies about 911?

Please post the device that you think turns steel to dust, an entire building. Go ahead make your delusion come true, post some evidence. Do you know what evidence is?
 
WTC Dust said:
It might be able to, but it didn't happen on 9/11.

Video evidence showing a lack of plane debris and the lack of a wake prove that no plane was flying in the air nearby.
Click to expand...


Liar.

You've seen just that on video & stills.
 
beachnut said:
A lie. Why do you post lies about 911?

Please post the device that you think turns steel to dust, an entire building. Go ahead make your delusion come true, post some evidence. Do you know what evidence is?
Click to expand...

I leaked the name of the weapon in this post

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7339381&postcount=3974

The dreaded Geshnookina Raygun. Look it up, it would be the ideal weapon for WTCduster to reference.

Seriously though, after having read much of this thread, I don't believe WTCdust is the real deal - no one can be that...wrong.
 
People are often offended by the unfamilar.

Edx said:
First thing I saw was this:

[qimg]http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_4o7nNikQBe8/TPAKaK1gc-I/AAAAAAAAAIo/z-4LSPgSbXI/S1600-R/do%2Byou%2Bsee%2Ba%2Bsimilar%2Bshape.jpg[/qimg]

And no I don't see a similar shape and you are also comparing a still image. No idea what you're trying to imply, but its cleary based on crazy :rolleyes:
Click to expand...
 
It wasn't the entire building, just most of it, and you can find images of the dust I'm talking about by googling.

beachnut said:
A lie. Why do you post lies about 911?

Please post the device that you think turns steel to dust, an entire building. Go ahead make your delusion come true, post some evidence. Do you know what evidence is?
Click to expand...
 
Why is the FAA fraudulently covering up for the murder of 3000 people? You cannot dismiss this question and simultaneously say there were no planes hijacked.



So answer it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom