Because they're optional. But necessary.
C’mon, this is plain denial. Tools and materials are a huge part of the profitability of Amway, just not at the distributor level.
1. Amway makes no money out of tools
2. The vast majority of profit comes from sale of Amway products, not tools.
Simple math to prove it.
Sales last year were $9.2billion. We'll ignore additional retail markup profit.
Amway pays out approximately 35% of revenues in bonuses and commissions to the field - ie $3.22 billion in
profit to the field, before any retail markup profit.
Are you seriously claiming Amway business support companies collectively
profit over $3 billion dollars a year? Revenues must be in excess of $10 billion, especially if Joecool's and Newton Trino's claims of extreme profit margins are true. There's only maybe 3 or 4 that are of any kind of significant size, so at least a couple of them must have revenues of several billion dollars a year.
Why aren't these multi-billion dollar companies on Forbes Largest Private Companies list? Some of them have been running for decades, shouldn't their owners be on the billionaires list?
C'mon, be serious. Have a little skepticism of the claims of the anti-amway zealots.
You showed us a link about a page back (and ignored my commentary on it) where a woman who burned out on Amway after 4 years hard work and thousands of dollars invested was blamed for her own failure because she didn't do the necessary work of putting the Amway business model in front of 15 new prospects a month.
Oh right, after 4 years of hard work she was "blamed" for her own failure because .... well .... because she didn't do 4 years of hard work. She didn't even do a month of medium work.
Do you make this stuff up
without thinking about it, or do you deliberately right such rubbish? (PS I didn't ignore the earlier post, I didn't see it. Not going back to look for it either, assuming it was full of the same mischarecterizations)
So…why would she need to show the business model to 15 new people if not to recruit them? Why would she need to recruit people if recruiting people were not the key to success in Amway? Are you going to deny that recruiting people is an important part of success? Or are you going to quibble over the definition of “success”?
Did you dishonestly misquote the article, or just have a poor memory?
Here's what it says, I've bolded the part you've selectively removed from your frontal lob -
if you want to build a profitable Amway business in a reasonable amount of time you need to expose the business plan and/or products to, ideally, at least 15 people/month.
Furthermore, showing the business model
incorporates showing the products. It is a strategy to obtain retail customers as well as business partners. Indeed, out of 15 "plan showings" you should be aiming for 3 or 4 sponsored people, of which only 1 your expect to be a business builder, even for a short time. Only 1 in 5 of them do you expect to be long term business partners, instead, if handled properly, reverting to customers. The others are merely discount customers right from the start, and you'll also pick up another 3 or 4 as full retail price customers.
You get that? Showing the business plan alone should result in up to 5 times as many customers as "business building recruits".
The Network 21 system for developing a platinum level business is based around finding 3 serious business building recruits, 3 hobbyists who might get serious one day, 14 "member" shoppers, and 20 regular customers a month, which means at least 50 customers on your books. Got that? A customer:serious business builder ratio (the ones buying tools) of almost 70:1.