• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Continuation - 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
bill smith said:
You are the one making unreasonable assumptions here. (See highlighted text)
Click to expand...

No, there's nothing unreasonable here. An irrational belief is one unsupported by evidence. The vicsim, controlled demolition ideas are not supported and are therefore irrational. It's pretty simple really.
 
OK, so as far as I know, Richard Gage is not a member of this forum, and because of this, he's not capable of being a victim of a rule 12 violation.

Having said that,


RICHARD GAGE IS A DAMN IDIOT AND A THIEF
 
bill smith said:
We all saw the hit pieces on TV. As regards the Hardfire show with Mark Roberts and Richard Gage here is Mark's own post here after the show. He doesn;t sound like a very happy bunny does he ? Rightfully so.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3789539&postcount=128
Click to expand...

in his online Powerpoint presentation I cataloged 311 false statements, 114 misleading statements, and 137 logical fallacies.
Click to expand...
Yes, I'd be a bit upset too, if I had to contend with that much wrong.

I think I saw a clip on YT of a similar piece from a radio show with Mark Roberts. Gage was saying what Mark believed, and Mark kept correcting him. Gage didn't even so much as apologize. I think it's indicative of his mental processes that direct contradictions to his claims from the person the claims are about are brushed aside without regard.
 
000063 said:
Yes, I'd be a bit upset too, if I had to contend with that much wrong.

I think I saw a clip on YT of a similar piece from a radio show with Mark Roberts. Gage was saying what Mark believed, and Mark kept correcting him. Gage didn't even so much as apologize. I think it's indicative of his mental processes that direct contradictions to his claims from the person the claims are about are brushed aside without regard.
Click to expand...

I find Richard Gage to be what I consider mild-mannered and polite. I have an encopunter that he had with the debunking director of the jref that shows that clearly. Would you like me to post a link ?
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
I find Richard Gage to be what I consider mild-mannered and polite. I have an encopunter that he had with the dubunking director of the jref that shows that clearly. Would you like me to post a link ?
Click to expand...

Lots of liars come across as polite. So do many crazy people. It's entirely possible that he could be a lying nut case and be polite. His actions leading up to the debate demonstrated some clear intellectual cowardice. Changing smacks of an attempt to avoid facing real criticism.
 
Craig4 said:
Yes, the belief in a controlled demolition is irrational. So if a person believes it regardless of occupation or memberships the have an irrational belief.

Out of all the members of the Royal Institute of British Architects today how many share this belief?
Click to expand...

Bill is lying. There were no architects from the Royal Institute of British Architects there. The event was held in a building owned by the Royal Institute of British Architects, but they did not host the event, nor did they attend.
 
DGM said:
What would you be testing? Should we also test if people think David Blaine can fly?
Click to expand...

Hi DGM,
Whether David Blaine can fly or not is not a matter of vital National importance. Whether the WTC Towers were demolished by controlled demolition on 9/11 is.
 
uke2se said:
Bill is lying. There were no architects from the Royal Institute of British Architects there. The event was held in a building owned by the Royal Institute of British Architects, but they did not host the event, nor did they attend.
Click to expand...

Sneaky. Now, Bill what do you have to say for yourself here? I'm very disappointed in you.
 
Bill:
Harold Camping convinced a bunch of people the world was going to end. They gave up all their "stuff". Jim Jones convinced a bunch of people to give up their lives.

Don't you think Gage should be addressing the structural engineering community instead of the general population?

Gage puts on a show to make a living. (I've been to it)
 
bill smith said:
Hi DGM,
Whether David Blaine can fly or not is not a matter of vital National importance. Whether the WTC Towers were demolished by controlled demolition on 9/11 is.
Click to expand...

No it's not. It's not a question of any importance being as we already know the cause of the collapse. I'm really more interested in your need believe this.
 
uke2se said:
Yep. As I recall, he said something to the effect that if he had known, Gage would never had been allowed to lease the premises.
Click to expand...

Do ypu have any links so we can have a look at it ? I just want to see if it looks like the pressure came on after the presentation and any other useful info.
 
Bill:
Do you think it's "interesting" that Gage (an architect) didn't see anything odd about 9/11 until he listened to a Dr. of Theology?

Just asking questions
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom