NoahFence
Banned
to the engineering and physics of how the WTC collapsed?
I'll get this, Clayton
The Joos physically did it.
Don't say I never did anything for ya.
to the engineering and physics of how the WTC collapsed?
Here's your other problem. You act as if your understanding of the events is equal to mine. Everyone is entitled to have "their side" but not all sides deserve the same level of consideration. You side is irrational based on a lack of evidence, sloppy data collection, a lack of rigor and a poor grasp of the basic facts. My view is better than yours because it's not plagued by these problems. You can't expect that your view is going to be treated as being as valid as mine when you can't support it.
Going back to your numbers, if your view held true for the general population you "side" wouldn't be so ineffectual. Let's face, it this world view of yours has no success stories. There are no new investigations. There are no candidates calling for new investigations. No one has been voted out of office for telling the "official story". If this belief was so rampant you'd have some trophy to hang on the wall.
I will just make this point. The evidence over a long period shows that if Richard Gage ga've a presentation to the entire Nation, coast to coast that at least 90% of America would believe in the controlled demolition of the WTC Towers on 9/11 How about setting that up ?

I will just make this point. The evidence over a long period shows that if the Architect Richard Gage gave a presentation to the entire Nation, coast to coast that at least 90% of America would believe in the controlled demolition of the WTC Towers on 9/11 How about setting that up ?
Maybe I'm not being clear. The people who see Gage are predisposed to irrational beliefs so therefore it's not a representative sample. You cannot draw any conclusions from your data and apply them to the general population. It's like going to a schizophrenia ward and asking the patients if they hear voices and saying based on the responses 99% of the population hears voices (I'm assuming paranoid schizophrenia here). You need a truly random sampling if you want to apply your findings to the entire population.
The people who see Gage are predisposed to irrational beliefs so therefore it's not a representative sample.
When is this guy gonna be suspended for attacks?
Even if "irrational" is removed, the point still holds. The people who would actively go to see a presentation by AE911Truth have a higher percentage of them who consider such theories plausible, at least, than the general population, just like the people who see Transformers 3 have a higher interest than the general population in giant robots and explosions.
You are saying that the architects from the Royal Institute of British Architacts in London who attended the presentation are irrational then ?
You will notice that all bar one do not believe that fire brought down the Towers, Personally I suspect that the journalist David Aaronovitz (a rabid debunker) who also attended the lecture is that one. If so the the bottom line is that NO attending architact at the prestigious RIBA accepts the OCT.
Would you fancy testing it on a national basis ? AAllow Richard Gage to give a nationwide Presentation
I will just make this point. The evidence over a long period shows that if the Architect Richard Gage gave a presentation to the entire Nation, coast to coast that at least 90% of America would believe in the controlled demolition of the WTC Towers on 9/11 How about setting that up ?
"Nationwide" meaning what, exactly? A special on NatGeo Channel? A congressional address? A roast?
Primetime saturday night ,heavily advertised in advance. on a National Channel.
Would you fancy testing it on a national basis ? AAllow Richard Gage to give a nationwide Presentation ?
Would you fancy testing it on a national basis ? AAllow Richard Gage to give a nationwide Presentation ?
Allow him? Very well. He's allowed to. Now what?
He has had several nationwide presentations.
He's been on National Geographic/History Channel docs regarding this idiocy. Where they gave him freedom to say and spew whatever he wanted.
He was crushed by Mark Roberts on Hardfire with Ron Weick.
He recently debated Chris Mohr, and I assume things didn't go well as ae911truth wont release the dvd of it as was planned so Chris is releasing a series of videos with what they discussed. Thread is still front page.
He's been on nationally syndicated quackpot radio shows such as Alex Jones.
His idiotic ideas are plastered all over youtube.
What you want to give him a Presidential override of all broadcast channels so he can spew his idiocy to everyone at once? Is that what you want? Please. He's had 4+ years to garner support. He's losing his grip on his cash cow as is evidenced by the recent post on thier site practically begging for more money. The "Truth Movement" is over, it's done, it's dead in the water. The facts and science of REALITY can not be overcome no matter how FAITHFULLY you want to believe that it was an inside job. It wasnt. Terrorists hijacked planes and crashed them successfully into 3 of 4 targets casuing the collapse and/or complete destruction of the WTC complex and surrounding buildings in lower Manhattan. Those are the facts and sorry it doesn't fit into your deluded world of controlled demolition and shadow governments, or jews or whoever the hell you think "did it".