• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Continuation - 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Tell you what kiddo.

YOU prove to me that explosives could have survived inside the twin towers after the impact and subsequent fires, and I won't need to be suspended. I'll voluntarily leave this forum never to return.

But you have to PROVE it - and no, "super sekrit military stuff" doesn't pass the test.


http://www.eurenco.com/en/high_explosives/high_explosives.html

High explosives for oil & gas industry

Perforating charges are currently used in casing guns, through tubing guns and tubing conveyed guns for oil well completion. The permanent goal for oil drilling companies is to increase the yield of oil wells: this is achieved thanks to heat resistant explosives, which are used at great depth to clear the way for the oil.

Indeed, heat resistance is an important quality for explosives used for perforating deep oil wells, since the temperature in a drilled hole increases with the depth. In that way, EURENCO works in close partnership with shaped charge manufacturers and produces heat resistant explosives suited for the oil industry and also used in the gas industry:
 
Clearly you have no idea what constitues proof.

This is the beginning of the conspiracy, dood. If you can't prove the explosives can survive, you can't prove they were used. Period.
 
http://www.eurenco.com/en/high_explosives/high_explosives.html

High explosives for oil & gas industry
Indeed, heat resistance is an important quality for explosives used for perforating deep oil wells, since the temperature in a drilled hole increases with the depth. In that way, EURENCO works in close partnership with shaped charge manufacturers and produces heat resistant explosives suited for the oil industry and also used in the gas industry:

Now you will of course tell us what temp range this would be, right?
"High" heat is a subjective thing after all.(Where I live 35o/sup]C is a brutally hot daytime "high" temp.)
 
I linked CM to a PDF (a US Army FM) a few weeks back that explained how explosives worked in general and even gave him some specific chapters to read that dealt with the issues that would have to be dealt with in all of the WTC buildings. Apparently he ignored me.

Truthers say explosives until you inform them that explosives need an explosive train that has a weak link at the detonators (they are very sensitive to heat and shock) and that no sounds of explosives were heard (which is inherent in how they work). Then they say that it was some form of therm*te instead. When it's pointed out to them that it takes a huge amount of thermite to cut through vertical steel columns and a mechanism to keep it held against the steel long enough to do its work they switch over to a combination of the two without stopping to think that they've just doubled the issues and not erased any.

Then they go back to it being explosives and 'round we go again. The insane ones go to mini nukes and space beams.

They still won't say how these magic devices managed to be placed and concealed in a working office building with NOBODY (from security officers to office workers to janitorial staff to maintenance men) noticing anything strange going on or suspicious items lying around.
 
Reviewing this thread, it has become the mosh pit of all things 9/11 related. There are many other 9/11 threads, covering a wide array of topics - use them.

This thread is for general 9/11 discussions NOT covered in other threads, not all things 9/11. If this thread continues to be the dumping ground for all 9/11 discussion, it will be summarily closed.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Locknar
 
Hi bill.
starting in from where we were when you were last here......





Hope you are well and can now post the link.

Forgive me if you already have. I have been on holidays and had just stepped into town to check my e-mails. I'll still have another week and a half so maybe after you post it you could pm me with a link to it.

thanks,
jd

ETA: I see that you have only been back here a few days. Sorry I did not notice on my few occassions of viewing the forum over the past few days.

Hi JD,
Long time no see. Never let it be said that I don't back up what I say.

( I hope that answering your question still conforms to the general and non-specific nature of this thread,)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jm-v-DElAZg
 
Last edited:
Reviewing this thread, it has become the mosh pit of all things 9/11 related. There are many other 9/11 threads, covering a wide array of topics - use them.

This thread is for general 9/11 discussions NOT covered in other threads, not all things 9/11. If this thread continues to be the dumping ground for all 9/11 discussion, it will be summarily closed.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Locknar


Your definition of general discussion would be what exactly? If this is a general discussion would that not be multiple general topics? I'm not trying to be disrespectful to a mod, but I'm confused as to your problem with this thread.
 
Your definition of general discussion would be what exactly? If this is a general discussion would that not be multiple general topics? I'm not trying to be disrespectful to a mod, but I'm confused as to your problem with this thread.

I think that finding 9/11 subjects NOT covered in other threads would be pretty difficult. In that case this general discussion thread would not be all that general.
 
Last edited:
They still won't say how these magic devices managed to be placed and concealed in a working office building with NOBODY (from security officers to office workers to janitorial staff to maintenance men) noticing anything strange going on or suspicious items lying around.

There's a "theory" that the buildings were really empty. Pretty daffy, I ran into it at Icke.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom