• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

WTC dust

Status
Not open for further replies.
Silly, I'm not talking about a plane. I'm talking about a PLANE CRASH!!!

I don't know how to emphasize this to you enough. Plane crash, plane crash, plane crash. I'm talking about the lack of evidence of a plane crash.



Craig4 said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mdSheSsNays&feature=related
Done and done. You're a liar. Your claims are lies.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bjQ8LXayc1w

Watch the second video with the sound on. Listen to the anguish. This is what you're making a stupid game out of. You aren't an expert and I don't care that you find getting told the truth tedious. Find the woman screaming in the video and tell here she didn't see a plane. Despicable. Disgusting.
Click to expand...
 
WTC Dust said:
What should I look for in this video, and when?
Click to expand...

double-facepalm.jpg
 
If I got the vibe from you that you were my friend and actually wanted good things for me, I might follow your advice, but not with this attitude.

I made a discovery about 9/11. I'm not going to stop talking about it.



NoahFence said:
YOU said they'd be the same, sister. Not me.


get a new hobby. Seriously. One of these days you're gonna piss off the wrong person. I wouldn't want to be there when that happens.

People died. REAL people. On REAL airplanes and in REAL buildings. This fantasy of yours does nothing but piss on their graves. I got a funny feeling when you finally kick the bucket, you're going south, kiddo.

STOP IT.
Click to expand...
 
Silly, I'm not talking about a plane. I'm talking about a PLANE CRASH!!!

I don't know how to emphasize this to you enough. Plane crash, plane crash, plane crash. I'm talking about the lack of evidence of a plane crash.
Click to expand...


Why are the images readily available, strewn all over the internet not sufficient for you?
Google Images WTC Aircraft Debris. Shanksville Debris. Pentagon Debris.
 
WTC Dust said:
Oh, poo. Do you really think I'm desecrating the names of the victims?

I think I'm helping the survivors. They breathed in a lot of the dust, and
up until now, this dust has been mischaracterized.

I think they deserve at least one person "on the case".
And I suffered, too. Don't forget I am a person, too.

You're convinced of the official story, fine, but what I also think you are convinced about is that anyone who would dare to question the story is morally bankrupt in some way, and I assure you that I'm not.

I'm a pink-haired biology researcher who got caught up in 9/11.
It was an accident. I smelled and saw and tasted the damaged World Trade Center, and I knew right away that what I was observing was not an ordinary fire. It had an almost unbelievable smell and character to it. Nobody was explaining this properly, so I had to continue to search.

You don't read me posting in other conspiracy threads because I'm not a conspiracy theorist. You must note that I haven't revealed to you who I think did the deed. I'm only talking about what was done.

The buildings were turned into a rather dusty foam. Parts of the buildings remained behind, strangely damaged.
Click to expand...

There's not a bit of honesty in this entire post, to include your comments on why you're doing this. The dust hadn't been mischaracterized until you mischaracterized it.
 
WTC Dust said:
Silly, I'm not talking about a plane. I'm talking about a PLANE CRASH!!!

I don't know how to emphasize this to you enough. Plane crash, plane crash, plane crash. I'm talking about the lack of evidence of a plane crash.
Click to expand...

See the big plane, flying into the building in the video? That, there would be evidence of a plane crash. When you're watching this video you are watching evidence of a plane crash for the simple reason you're watching a plane crash. Note the plane crashing into the building. A plane crashing into something is the definition of a plane crash. Is it coming together for you now? Did you put the pieces of the planes crashing into the WTC puzzle together finally?

Now do try to remember when you play your stupid little made up game about lasers that you're watching people die in these videos. It's obvious that's something else you haven't grasped yet. You would take this more seriously if you did.
 
You're getting the idea, but missing the point that a wake is a column of fluid that is being drug along by the craft.

In the case of a boat on water, it is easy to see the wake. With a plane flying through air, many times the wake is invisible.

Invisible or not, the wake would have disturbed the explosions coming from WTC 2 and the fumes rising from WTC 1 at the time of the WTC 2 explosions. The particles in the explosions and fumes would have visualized the wake as the moisture does to the contrail.

The wake would have slammed up against WTC 2 and WTC 1 and would have made itself known (like moisture giving evidence of the contrail). The explosions and fumes did not appear to be slammed into by a huge column of air, is all I'm saying. But since wakes follow airplanes in all cases, the lack of a wake proves no airplane came any where close to the building.

If the "second plane" had merely flown close to the WTC 1 fuming, those fumes would have been whipped around.

So to summarize: it is the lack of plane debris bouncing off the south face of WTC 2 at 9:03AM that proves that a plane crash did not occur, and the lack of evidence of a wake proves that a real plane did not fly anywhere near the WTC complex at 9:03AM.

Also, when you looked inside the holes of both buildings, you couldn't see a plane. Also, they never reconstructed the planes that were said to have crashed in D.C. and Shanksville. Not looking good for plane-huggers, is it?

NoahFence said:
It would appear not.

What if I'm driving an 18 wheeler at 70mph, and I impact a roll of paper towels. You think you're gonna get bouce-back from that?



Oh, there was a wake alright. If you were behind that plane you'd be thrown for a loop. Who knows, maybe you were. That would explain quite a bit.

If you're looking for a contrail, you'll need more moisture in the air to make it visible, and it would have to be a bit colder.
Click to expand...
 
At what point in the video do we get to see plane debris bouncing off the south face of WTC 2?

And at what point in the video do we get to see evidence of the wake that would have followed any airplane, if one had flown nearby the WTC?



Craig4 said:
See the big plane, flying into the building in the video? That, there would be evidence of a plane crash. When you're watching this video you are watching evidence of a plane crash for the simple reason you're watching a plane crash. Note the plane crashing into the building. A plane crashing into something is the definition of a plane crash. Is it coming together for you now? Did you put the pieces of the planes crashing into the WTC puzzle together finally?

Now do try to remember when you play your stupid little made up game about lasers that you're watching people die in these videos. It's obvious that's something else you haven't grasped yet. You would take this more seriously if you did.
Click to expand...
 
Does it have debris bouncing off the south face of WTC 2 at the moment of supposed impact?

Does it show evidence of the wake that follows any large aircraft?

If yes, please tell me the times.



Redtail said:
The part when the plane crashes into the building.
Click to expand...
 
WTC Dust said:
You added the word "intact" not me.

At the site of every plane crash, there is a plane found.

A complimentary rule is that if you don't find a plane at the site,
there was no plane crash.

To put it into an equation:

plane crash = plane



You could say, "But what if the plane crashed into the water, and they couldn't find it?" and I'd say they better dredge that water and find the plane, because it will be there somewhere.

A plane doesn't crash into the ground and then go bye-bye. The tail section usually survives without much damage. But you have all kinds of small items inside the plane like luggage and things that would not be obliterated into shreds if a plane merely crashed into the ground.

Mainly, you'd find the pieces of a plane if there were a plane crash.

plane crash = plane (in all cases)

You do the math.
Click to expand...

You are deluded, Your illogical reasoning is akin to that of someone who is suffering the later stages of a venereal disease (like Al Capone,). You might want to cut back on the serial ingestion of semen. high speed plane crashes do not leave recognizable wreckage. As illustrated in the video below @ 3 minutes in.
Pacific Southwest Airlines Flight 1771



 
Last edited:
Do you realize what you're saying? That a column of air is going to stop on a dime?

Besides, you're saying the plane didn't stop until it got to the interior of the building, so it would have gone at least that far even if you were right, which you are not.

NoahFence said:
The wake stops when the plane stops, by the way.
Click to expand...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom