dafydd
Banned
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2008
- Messages
- 35,398
Two workers did step up and say they knew of/observed 3 black boxes being found at the sit of the twin towers.
Eh?
Not again. Boring.
Two workers did step up and say they knew of/observed 3 black boxes being found at the sit of the twin towers.
Eh?
Its already begun,
The conspiracy's propaganda minister seems to be experiencing unusually persistent difficulties. He is like Dorian Gray, and people have gotten a good look at his portrait. I believe that his personal graveyard has also gotten flooded, and all his victims coffins are floating up to the surface.
Nothing suspicious about the dogs being removed well before 9/11?
There's a quantum step from believing something and accepting the possible consequences of coming out.
It becomes a legal case only if/when the accused decides to take you to court, or if you decide to take action on it yourself. Libel is by definition a form of defamation regardless of whether any action is taken. It seems unlikely you'll do the latter, like the thousands of other conspiracy proponents who like to accuse people but never prove them or do anything actionable.I'm sure LS is really suffering from my comments and that I'll be summoned to court any day now.
Possible consequences? Ask Richard Gage what the consequences are. He gets 75K a year to travel the world. Not too shabby.
Nothing suspicious about the dogs being removed well before 9/11?
We went with 4 of our dogs and handlers. Our main function was US&R, live person, (not cadaver search) but all of our dogs are cross trained in several disciplines, including EDD and Incendiary detection.
They had dogs on a SAR task. I don't think they'd be reacting to explosives.
It has been proven that thier story is quite impossible. The lying sacks of crap have the boxes near the tops of the pile within days, when anybody with a room temp IQ who tried to model the distribution of debris woulkd realize that they should have been pretty near the bottom if outside the footprint or buried a couple yards deep if inside. You would have to have fallen off the short yellow bus to believe that there would have been FBI agents on ATVs in the middle of that crap.Two workers did step up and say they knew of/observed 3 black boxes being found at the sit of the twin towers.
Eh?
$205 a day travelling? Breakfast, a burger and a room?
$205 a day travelling? Breakfast, a burger and a room?
I like how you can't keep your nonsense straight for the length of a sentence. Was it a gravitational collapse, or was it caused by fire? Because the OS claims Plane+Fire for the towers, and debris+mostly fire for 7. You've been corrected on this several times, and it doesn't seem to take.What did happen was three complete and totally destructive collapses that could not have occurred by gravitational energy alone after the fire damage that caused the collapses
You mean the material that was shipped to Staten Island, where much of it remains to this day, and in many cases given away?The NIST report is an embarrassing admission of how thoroughly the material (evidence?) was destroyed.
I think I know where it is, but I'm not sure you could find it with both hands.Would anyone have any objections to me pulling the legs off of the spider, when I find it?
It's not about justice for them, it's about validation. Subpoena power would mean that someone with Authority actually thought their claims made sense. Truthers then imagine themselves, like Perry Mason or Matlock or Ally McBeal, weaving a web of facts the conspirators can't crawl their way out of, exposing them for all to see.If you were right, why would "under oath" matter? You don't think it's possible to lie "under oath"?
Why don't you stop the "truther" talking points and think for once?
Goalpost movement in 3......2.......1......
There's a quantum step from believing something and accepting the possible consequences of coming out.
1. No source.Two workers did step up and say they knew of/observed 3 black boxes being found at the sit of the twin towers.
Eh?
$205 a day travelling? Breakfast, a burger and a room?
They weren't, so no.
They absolutely would. What part of "they are cross trained" do you not understand?
This video shows a "normal" office fire.
<snip>
There's a quantum step from believing something and accepting the possible consequences of coming out.
And Richard Gage and the "1500 Architechs and Engineers" are still employeed in their professions and are still alive today because....?
Clayton, your faith in mankind is troubling and highly dellusional. Do you really believe that thousands of good honest Americans (including many foreigners) who worked on the investigation of 9/11 would keep their mouths shut if they believed they had hard evidence to show 9/11 was an inside jobby job? All of the hundreds of professionals that were assigned to NIST's investigation of the collapse of the WTC and building 7 could have be "silenced"? All of the people who lost their comrades that day could be "silenced"?
Dude, you've seen waaaaaaay too many movies.
Nothing suspicious about the dogs being removed well before 9/11?
We went with 4 of our dogs and handlers. Our main function was US&R, live person, (not cadaver search) but all of our dogs are cross trained in several disciplines, including EDD and Incendiary detection.
They had dogs on a SAR task. I don't think they'd be reacting to explosives.