How will Dems personally destroy Marco Rubio?

[JoeTheJuggler]

JudeBrando?

There are a number of very good challenges in need of a response.

Why don't you man up and answer them?

At least tell me whether you have quit beating your wife yet.


(NB: This is on topic, as I indicated previously, as an example of the loaded question fallacy.)

 

[Ray Brady]

Have Republicans officially run out of real things to whine about?

 

[JoeTheJuggler]

Destruction in two easy steps:

1) Describe his political beliefs.

2) Describe his actions as governor.

Destruction complete.

Given today's political climate, that wouldn't even result in his political destruction, much less his personal destruction.

Don't forget what Barnum said.

 

[BenBurch]

Have Republicans officially run out of real things to whine about?

Oh I wish!

 

[JudeBrando]

And he doesn't have a clue how to accomplish that.

He doesn't?

Trans: Dems, please justify my self-pity!!!!!

What? Nothing.

Don't let Rubio's light skin fool ya. He's a gosh darn hispanic, and he wants to let all his southren brethren into America too. Jude, you need to warn all your brethren at freerepublic that Rubio is from CUBA!!11!11 Cuba is a communist country, therefore Rubio is a COMMUNIST!!111!!!!1

Sifting through that sludge of an answer, I gather you think the Dems got nothin' on him yet, right?
But you're against him already too, right?

 

[JudeBrando]

Wow. Preemptive political whining projected four years out. You must really love this Rubio guy, JudeBrando. Just hope that he doesn't start crying and blubbering over imaged insults like you are, or his chances of getting elected will rise to Palinistic heights.

No idea what you're insulting me about here or why.
I like what I have seen and heard of him so far.
Do you have any objections to him yet other than that you must object?

 

[Ausmerican]

He doesn't?What? Nothing.
Sifting through that sludge of an answer, I gather you think the Dems got nothin' on him yet, right?
But you're against him already too, right?

Shifting through your sludge of a thread I ather you cant find any Dems trying to destroy Rubio yet, right?
But you are aainst their non existant attacks already, right?

If only there was a word that mean to pre judge people based on your own beliefs. Like pre-judiced or something.

 

[JudeBrando]

ftfy

No answer.

We were actually planning to crush him with stones...

No answer.

Conservatives sure do love playing the victim these days. To answer the question in the OP, I hope the Dems use rocket launchers to personally destroy him. That would be sweet!!

No answer.

The talking points to parrot clearly have not gone out yet.

As to the OP, he's half right. We need new taxpayers and new taxes or, rather, the old taxes back.

Alright! At least we have a decent and serious answer. Right on, Upchurch.

Hmmm, that sounds like he is talking about amnesty for illegal aliens. . . .

How about it, Jude?

That's how you interpreted that? I took that to clearly mean new jobs.

 

[hgc]

No idea what you're insulting me about here or why.
I like what I have seen and heard of him so far.
Do you have any objections to him yet other than that you must object?

I haven't given him much thought, to tell the truth.

My objection is to you. I don't know how to state in planer language what the problem is. You are preemptively crying about an insult that has not yet been delivered. You started a thread for just that purpose. I can only guess at why you're doing it.

 

[JudeBrando]

Sounds like a great plan! All that we have to do is get the unemployment rate down to about negative 30% or so every year for the next ten years.

So just how does the good Senator plan to do that?

Is there any chance that you are willing to listen to him answer or is it your intention to oppose him beforehand regardless?

Oppressing gays and cutting taxes. Those are the only appropriate things for a government to do.

apparently.

And just when I thought there was a chance you could be reasonable..

Well, MY idea is to post a bunch of threads on JREF with leading questions for titles and false premises as content. I think it's a peach of an idea.

Wherever you go, there you are.

The Dems will most certainly attempt to personally destroy Marco Rubio whenever he becomes a larger threat.

None of the others have come up with any good objections yet.

I don't think they will.

I don't think Dem leaders will either. The Playbook will not work on him.

Do you happen to have any thoughts on how Dems might target him
or did you just want to crap on the thread and me?

Jude wants to discover a way of jutting out his bottom lip, walking around and sulking and expecting people to take pity on him: "Waaaaaaaah! Why don't you just say howwible nasty things about my latest heart-thwob and then I will scweam and scweam and scweam until I am sick!"

Who cares about Jude? Jude sucks. What about Marco Rubio?

 

[NotJesus]

No idea what you're insulting me about here or why.
I like what I have seen and heard of him so far.
Do you have any objections to him yet other than that you must object?

Why don't you try starting a thread with a statment of some substance then? "I like Rubio. Here's why..." That might lead to a discussion. Starting off with unfounded self-pity and sneering disdain for anyone who might conceivably disagree is not productive.

In other words: Grow up.

 

[Ray Brady]

Why don't you try starting a thread with a statment of some substance then? "I like Rubio. Here's why..." That might lead to a discussion. Starting off with unfounded self-pity and sneering disdain for anyone who might conceivably disagree is not productive.

In other words: Grow up.

Bravo.

 

[JoeTheJuggler]

No idea what you're insulting me about here or why.

Pretty much just what he said. You're whining about a smear campaign that you think will happen in the future, but hasn't.

My own objection is to your use of the loaded question fallacy.

 

[JoeTheJuggler]

Joe, I'm sorry, no matter how hard you try and keep trying, you just don't have anything smart to say.

Yes, I do--I've pointed out that you have used the loaded question fallacy. Look at the top of the page. This forum is "a place to discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly and lively way". I'm pointing out the flaw in your reasoning.

So, thusly, you have no objections to Marco Rubio yourself either, or just not yet?

Yet another example of the loaded question fallacy. Have you stopped beating your wife yet?

We've well-established that I suck now and then... but what do you think of Marco Rubio?

Indeed, what about him? Do you have any position other than the absurd loaded question you ask in the thread title and OP?

Isn't the topic here the "Dems" and what they will do about Rubio? If you really want to start a discussion of Rubio, you sure started it out poorly.

 

[JudeBrando]

Shifting through your sludge of a thread I ather you cant find any Dems trying to destroy Rubio yet, right?
But you are aainst their non existant attacks already, right?

If only there was a word that mean to pre judge people based on your own beliefs. Like pre-judiced or something.

Jude sucks!!! What do you think of Marco Rubio?

And it was "sifting." How do you shift through sludge?

I haven't given him much thought, to tell the truth.

That's a simple, fair and honest answer. It was like pulling another tooth.

My objection is to you. I don't know how to state in planer language what the problem is. You are preemptively crying about an insult that has not yet been delivered. You started a thread for just that purpose. I can only guess at why you're doing it.

Boo hoo. I couldn't have been any plainer in stating exactly what I think and meant. That's why you object. As if the Dems are going to kind and gracious to him. What a preposterous preemptive speculatively motivated agenda ... bwuahahaa duh.

Check out Marco Rubio for yourself before they indoctrinate you as to why you should hate his evilness. You know it's true.


He's new to me too. I don't know him. I'm not advocating him. But I'm fending off donkeys like water off a ducks back.

 

[angrysoba]

Who cares about Jude? Jude sucks.

He sure does.

What about Marco Rubio?

I think there is a general feeling of indifference towards him and a distinct lack of a campaign to destroy him.

 

[Ausmerican]

Jude sucks!!! What do you think of Marco Rubio?

I dont think of him. I dont live in Florida.

 

[Upchurch]

No answer.
No answer.
No answer.

Do you not realize that you did, in fact, get answers for the question you asked? It just wasn't, apparently, the question you wanted an answer for.

You didn't ask what our opinions of a particular politician are. You asked how the Democrats would personally destroy him.

The answer is that they haven't and that it is rather childish to assume that they, or especially the members of this board, would.

Now, what question are you really asking?

 

[elbe]

Considering how really, really poor the Dems are at concerted efforts I find it hard to believe they are organized enough to work to destroy the junior senator from florida. I should think they'd have bigger fish to fry.

 

[JudeBrando]

Why don't you try starting a thread with a statment of some substance then? "I like Rubio. Here's why..." That might lead to a discussion. Starting off with unfounded self-pity and sneering disdain for anyone who might conceivably disagree is not productive.

In other words: Grow up.

Because I said what I wanted to say. Why don't you start your boring and ignored thread?

You're whining about a smear campaign that you think will happen in the future, but hasn't.

lol

Yes, I do--

We disagree.

I've pointed out that you have used the loaded question fallacy. Look at the top of the page. This forum is "a place to discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly and lively way". I'm pointing out the flaw in your reasoning.

Yet another example of the loaded question fallacy. Have you stopped beating your wife yet?

Indeed, what about him? Do you have any position other than the absurd loaded question you ask in the thread title and OP?

Isn't the topic here the "Dems" and what they will do about Rubio? If you really want to start a discussion of Rubio, you sure started it out poorly.

If you can hurry up and figure out how, Joe, you can say you hated Rubio before they told you how to.

I think there is a general feeling of indifference towards him and a distinct lack of a campaign to destroy him.

Holy crap! Another real answer! You're right, that's true, because he's new. But all he has to do is give a few more publicized speeches and start garnering the attention that he and his ideas will get, and the attack dogs will start biting.

I dont think of him. I dont live in Florida.

Start thinking of him. I'm sure top Dems are. He's a contender who's not going away.