• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Richard Gage Blueprint for Truth Rebuttals on YouTube by Chris Mohr

Status
Not open for further replies.

chrismohr

Master Poster
chrismohr
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
2,080
This is a thread for my twenty respectful rebuttal YouTube videos of Richard Gage's 911 video Blueprint for Truth, which are getting posted in late June of 2011. They can be found on YouTube by going to my account, chrismohr911, or typing in keywords such as Richard Gage Chris Mohr Blueprint for Truth Rebuttal. My videos are arranged by subject (such as freefall collapse of Building 7, iron microspheres, history of collapse of tall steel framed buildings, etc.) and explore most of Richard Gage's assertions of controlled demolition of the three World Trade Center Buildings on 9/11.

Richard Gage and I debated this subject for over four hours on March 6, 2011. AE911Truth videotaped it for general distribution but decided against releasing it, so the information I have compiled for the debate is available in this format only. I lay out 235 reasons why I believe the science doesn't support controlled demolition. I have well over 200 photos and videos to illustrate my points.

When discussing all these YouTube videos, you might want to start with "Reason #.... says ..... but I think ........" so everyone knows what you're responding to. I tried to be totally respectful in my rebuttals. I'll be respectful on this thread as well when I choose to respond.

For more information, you can also look at the jref thread, Gage's Next Debate, which has some 1500 posts on it from metallurgists, physicists, foundry workers, heavy equipment operators, chemists, engineers, an FDNY firefighter and many more, whose answers to my questions were invaluable. Here's to a lively discussion!
 
Hi Tri and all,

I visit with the college guy Monday, and if all goes well I hope to at least start posting the YouTubes by Monday night. At most I'll have the first twelve of twenty videos up and running, which would be all the Twin Towers ones.
 
Well I can see where you're going to have problems already. You're asking for opinions by asking truthers what they think. They don't think, they "Just Know" or simply can't interpret evidence correctly. They will make links where there are none and phrase questions or make statements in such a way as to not actually ask a question or make a statement that actually says something but instead is designed to infer something that is provably false. That way, when called out on it they can claim that they didn't say that, even though that's exactly what they were implying by their question or statement.
 
It'll be a few days yet before the YouTube videos come out... I just saw the first draft of the first hour of rebuttals (the total will be over three hours) and I'm real happy with what my video editor guy is doing. Unlike the original debate, I take my time explaining every point. It won't be for the casual YouTube surfer but it'll explain our points VERY clearly. Surely by July 4 I'll have something out there, and the whole thing not long after that. Hang in there it's in the pipeline, Chris
 
chrismohr said:
It'll be a few days yet before the YouTube videos come out... I just saw the first draft of the first hour of rebuttals (the total will be over three hours) and I'm real happy with what my video editor guy is doing. Unlike the original debate, I take my time explaining every point. It won't be for the casual YouTube surfer but it'll explain our points VERY clearly. Surely by July 4 I'll have something out there, and the whole thing not long after that. Hang in there it's in the pipeline, Chris
Click to expand...

There aren't too many others :boggled:
 
9/11 Richard Gage Blueprint for Truth Video Respectful Rebuttals: Three online so far

Here's a link to my first YouTube video rebuttal of Gage's Blueprint for Truth. Three of them are up so far and 17 more on their way! This one is a unifying statement directed to people on both sides of the issue. The real content begins in Part One, an explanation of a likely collapse scenario for the WTC 9/11 Twin Towers. Part Two is an independent investigation of Richard Gage's Ten reasons for controlled demolition.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jC3JgWkNNIQ

Happy viewing,
Chris Mohr
 
You are way too nice to them, but politeness is hardly a vice. :D Looks interesting so far. Added to the ol' blog.
 
JamesB said:
You are way too nice to them, but politeness is hardly a vice. :D Looks interesting so far. Added to the ol' blog.
Click to expand...
Thanks James,

I hope others too will spread the word, here on jref as well as elsewhere.
 
I viewed the first two Chris. Top stuff appropriate to your chosen audience.

clap.gif
 
chrismohr said:
Here's a link to my first YouTube video rebuttal of Gage's Blueprint for Truth. Three of them are up so far and 17 more on their way! This one is a unifying statement directed to people on both sides of the issue. The real content begins in Part One, an explanation of a likely collapse scenario for the WTC 9/11 Twin Towers. Part Two is an independent investigation of Richard Gage's Ten reasons for controlled demolition.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jC3JgWkNNIQ

Happy viewing,
Chris Mohr
Click to expand...

Great, finally some material for my blog! :D

I'll have a playlist with the completed videos up today and add each new video as it appears. The audio of the Mohr/Gage debate can be heard here.

Btw, the room you made the videos in makes it look like you're giving a lecture in a church but I assume it's your, or someone else's, house.
 
My First Seven Video Rebuttals of Gage's Blueprint for Truth

Hi all,

Here are links to the introduction and parts 1-6 of my YouTube Gage rebuttals. This is 1/3 of the total of what will soon be available:

intro http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jC3JgWkNNIQ
part 1 how collapses initiated http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-WQdmpdM_g
part 2 Richard's ten reasons for natural collapse
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=If5C8YiXHhE
part 3 history of fire collapses http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsjfSG69Pik
part 4 symmetrical/freefall http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsjfSG69Pik
part 5 lateral ejection of steel and squibs http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2538YN1l1nA
part 6 pulverized concrete and steel http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZD0zg1OwBSo

Easy keywords as more get posted next week: Richard Gage Blueprint for Truth Rebuttal Debunked Part...

Right now this is the only comment thread I know of. I am asking some 911 Truth folks if anyone wants to open a thread on one of their blogs. Do let us know if any do open up! To add your comments to this blog you have to sign in, of course.

Happy 4th, I'll be back at this next week for more YouTube uploads.
 
Great stuff Chris,

I think your videos are pretty good at presenting an opposite view to the truth. And I like how you are using the ae911 pillars of evidence as the basis for your responses.

The only thing really annoying is that the "Part #" is so far back in your Youtube title that makes it difficult to find the next one. This will become even more confusing when you upload more.
 
Responses to Tom and Dave

Hi Tom,

No one has ever complimented me before for being "pretty good at presenting an opposite view to the truth." But OK, thanks. I also took your advice and put the Part #s at the beginning of each title to make it easier for viewers.

And Dave, before I even had my debate with Richard last March 6, I had already been called a false prophet. As in, lo and behold, the Lord said unto me, no bombs were placed. I've used a lot of arguments in my debate against Richard but honestly I never even thought to use that one!

Richard Gage has also gotten some truly bizarre criticisms. The "dark side" has reared its head against both of us.

Part Seven re Eyewitness Accounts of Explosions has just been posted. Cheers all!
 
Telltale Tom said:
Great stuff Chris,

I think your videos are pretty good at presenting an opposite view to the truth. And I like how you are using the ae911 pillars of evidence as the basis for your responses.

The only thing really annoying is that the "Part #" is so far back in your Youtube title that makes it difficult to find the next one. This will become even more confusing when you upload more.
Click to expand...

I've made a playlist with all the available videos in the correct order which you can view here. You can also watch the playlist on my blog. I will add new videos to the playlist as they appear.
 
chrismohr said:
Hi Tom,

No one has ever complimented me before for being "pretty good at presenting an opposite view to the truth." But OK, thanks. I also took your advice and put the Part #s at the beginning of each title to make it easier for viewers.
...
Click to expand...

Hey Chris, in case you didn't know, Telltale Tom is our resident AE911truth satirist. He plays the Gage supporter expertly, assumes a rôle of spokesperson for that outfit, and through TT's words, the full stupidity of their arguments become apparent. Very funny, if you like that sort of fine satire (I do), but some posters here consider Tom to be a troll (I strongly disagree).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom