Moonbat alert: Chomksy condemns Bin Laden kill.

If Afghanistan would be a model democracy today, you might have a point, but it isn't. It's one of the most backwards countries on the planet and an utterly destroyed hellhole, ten years after Chomsky's article. If his warning about starving population was entirely accurate or just picking a tendency from the recent news is completely irrelevant. In tendency he was - bloody - right and you just don't like to see the ugly, big picture.

Most Americans do not care much about the situation in Afghanistan, as I was saying quite some posts ago, unless it is about their own soldiers getting killed and or the taxes they have to pay on it.
 
If Afghanistan would be a model democracy today, you might have a point, but it isn't. It's one of the most backwards countries on the planet and an utterly destroyed hellhole, ten years after Chomsky's article. If his warning about starving population was entirely accurate or just picking a tendency from the recent news is completely irrelevant. In tendency he was - bloody - right and you just don't like to see the ugly, big picture.

Afghanistan is doing better than its ever been. Chomsky got it completely wrong. Millions of refugees returned home after the Taliban were sent packing and food, medical and economic aid and infrastructure came in. That's the reverse of famine and genocide.

Admit it. The guru got it wrong. He wanted a ton of corpses to blame on America.
 
Last edited:
Afghanistan is doing better than its ever been. Chomsky got it completely wrong. Millions of refugees returned home after the Taliban were sent packing and food, medical and economic aid and infrastructure came in. That's the reverse of famine and genocide.

Admit it. The guru got it wrong. He wanted a ton of corpses to blame on America.

Bingo, that's the Chomsky SOP.
 
If Afghanistan would be a model democracy today, you might have a point, but it isn't.

Clue for the clueless: that wasn't about Afghanistan becoming a democracy. It was about whether or not a "silent genocide" would occur. And it didn't.

It's one of the most backwards countries on the planet and an utterly destroyed hellhole, ten years after Chomsky's article.

In other words, no worse than before. Contrary to his claim. So... fail.

If his warning about starving population was entirely accurate or just picking a tendency from the recent news is completely irrelevant.

That's the whole bloody point. It WASN'T "picking a tendency from the recent news". He made specific, unsupported claims about our motives. Claims that events have proven to be ridiculous. He wasn't merely not "entirely accurate". He was completely and utterly wrong. And you're as dishonest as he was about not admitting his error. It's quite pathetic, really. Especially for you. I mean, dishonest as it was, I can understand Chomsky trying to weasel out of his own failures. But what the hell would motivate you to tie your own credibility to that albatross?

In tendency he was - bloody - right and you just don't like to see the ugly, big picture.

The ugly, big picture doesn't include genocide.

Perhaps that is, for you, an ugly picture you don't want to see.
 
For example, note posts #53 and #74. I wasn't wrong, I was right. And Chomsky wasn't right, he was wrong.

Help a guy out...I can't imagine you meant #53 (joey, with a couple of gratuitous personal remarks) or #74 (mikey, asking if chomsky was ever sane (I think it's a rhetorical question)).
 
What's this got to do with anything Shrek? Islamic terrorists were behind 9/11 so America went and got them. And liberated Iraq to boot.

Liberated Iraq, ha ha! You make funny joke!

Afghanistan is doing better than its ever been! That's even funnier!

What about the other, ongoing wars of Freemoxy?

Please share more of your jokes
 
Last edited:
Liberated Iraq, ha ha! You make funny joke!

Used to be a genocidal fascist state, now it's the first Arab democracy.

Afghanistan is doing better than its ever been! That's even funnier!

Please list all the clinics, schools, infrastructure, roads, cell phone towers ect that were built under the Taliban.

What about the other, ongoing wars of Freemoxy?

I don't know what you're drivelling about.

Are you willing to admit that the Prophet Chomsky was wrong and there was no "slow, silent genocide" in Afghanistan?
 
Last edited:
"They" (the united Muslim horde of your imagination) did not initiate the "conflicts."

Please don't create straw-men. The topic is Hezbollah, not any imaginary "united Muslim horde".

Do you deny Hezbollah initiated the war in 2006?
 
Afghanistan is doing better than its ever been.

this is either delusion or outright lie.
poppy production is afghanistan is at an all time high.
the drug-lords have a strangle hold on the country since we have put them in government.
the taliban is stronger than ever.

surely you don't really believe your statement.

if we really care3wd about the afghanis, we would legitimize the poppy farmers and gear their production to medical morphine rather than heroin.
we could be stopping pain rather than starting it.
the world is very shy on morphine and awash in afghani heroin.
is that your idea of doing well?
 
how about the bombing of schools and hospitals in gaza during operation cast lead?
killing hundreds of gazan children is certainly an act of terrorism.

How about soldiers who choose to use hospitals and schools as fire bases? What do you call them?
 
poppy production is afghanistan is at an all time high.

It happens to employ a lot of people who would otherwise be unemployed.

the drug-lords have a strangle hold on the country since we have put them in government.

Do you prefer drug lords or Religious fanatics?

the taliban is stronger than ever.

Didn't you just say the drug-lords have a strangle hold on the country? Does this not impact the Taliban?

if we really care3wd about the afghanis, we would legitimize the poppy farmers and gear their production to medical morphine rather than heroin.

Or by building up their infrastructure (maybe through a pipeline? :) )
 
the average iraqi was much better off under saddam than they currently are.
any iraqi-canadian i have spoken to has confirmed this.

There are quite a number of Iraqi-Canadians. Have you spoken with all of them? :)

Why don't we ask some Iraqi women what they think about the former boss?

That's not to say Iraq isn't dangerous now that he's gone. Saddam's party and secret police(allied to various AQ and Islamic militias) were tearing the country apart rather than see it stabilize itself.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom