• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Continuation - 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Listen kiddo - YOU said fires can't last 99 days. You've been shown numerous occasions where they DO.

Can't you just admit you were wrong and move on?
I am rarely wrongright. So tell me what caused the fires under the rubble to last 99 days.

FTFY -

As for what caused the fires to burn for 99 days? I'm thinking flammable stuff.
 
So, why would the BEST course of action be to read a book to children???

No, the best course of action would be to find some fringe element of society who thinks I can do no right, and ask them what their opinion will be in 10 years - then act accordingly so we don't hurt the delicate sensibilities of the aforementioned fringe element of society.
 
...


A troofer running away in the middle of a spanking. Typical :rolleyes:

I am not a "troofer", truther, or word that rhymes with "ooth".

I simply don't care enough to hold such a stance.

I find that the government FAILED in its most basic duty.

That is the TRUTH, and is as far as I am willing to go, in my conclusions.
 
...

You're welcome. It is rare for a doubter of the accepted story to express awareness of his own limitations and the general spirit of good intentions in this forum, even amid some hostility in tone. I hope the replies you got at least made you adopt a more skeptic stance towards your own, ill-informed, opinions.

It did, and I am thankful for the answers I got.

This forum almost never disappoints.

Be well, all.
 
I am not a "troofer", truther, or word that rhymes with "ooth".

I simply don't care enough to hold such a stance.

I find that the government FAILED in its most basic duty.

That is the TRUTH, and is as far as I am willing to go, in my conclusions.
When you say "government" you mean people. right?

The question you need to ask yourself is, Did these people do this with criminal intent and what would be the benefit of holding them responsible (assuming no criminal intent).
 
I simply don't care enough to hold such a stance.

I find that the government FAILED in its most basic duty.

That is the TRUTH, and is as far as I am willing to go, in my conclusions.


So, when you said...

Basically, I do NOT believe that a group of men armed only with box cutters could penetrate the Pentagon's air space [...]


...what was that? Looks like a stance to me, and one that is shared by anyone who aligns themselves with 9/11 Truth.

Either way, you cared enough to say something.
 
That's absurd. I'd like to hear what your fellow debunkers have to say about your assessment.
Speaking of internal dissent, KotA is LIHOP, and you're MIHOP. Have you two had a chat about it yet?

Agreed.

But, WHILE we are under actual attack, that level of danger would be increased, right?

"...Mr. President, we are under attack..."

So, why would the BEST course of action be to read a book to children???

That is just freaking nuts to me. Defending those actions makes zero sense.
Why do you keep strawmanning it into us claiming it was the "best" course of action, when several people have criticized it? It wasn't the absolute best, but it was reasonable. It would've been extremely difficult for them to choose the "best" course of action with what little information they had, and it's easy to criticize in retrospect.

The classroom was more secure than running outside, where he'd have to wait for transport. If there were any snipers, he would literally be giving them a target.

Also, you still have not tied this into any 9/11 CT.

With that I'll take my leave, as this is not a topic I will ever feel fully informed on, and one I wish not to pursue.
Yet you are still entirely willing to expound at length on it. Not only are you not making an informed decision, but you actively refuse to inform yourself, and ignore information presented.

As I said, contemptible.
 
Last edited:
No people those estimates had to be nonsense. I mean Oystein's estimated a huge amount of flammable stuff and everyone knows that office buildings aren't just packed with gasoline canisters everywhere.


Gasoline is the only thing that's flammable right?????????RIGHT!!!???!!!
 
No people those estimates had to be nonsense. I mean Oystein's estimated a huge amount of flammable stuff and everyone knows that office buildings aren't just packed with gasoline canisters everywhere.


Gasoline is the only thing that's flammable right?????????RIGHT!!!???!!!

Uh...no.
Thermite is flammable. So are trees. Grass. Firewood. RDX. C4. Dino-Mite. Bamboo. Alpaca fur. Nitrogen.

Unless you can prove none of those things were in the trade towers, we MUST conclude that they were, but burned out before the requisite 99 day fire expiration period. Because gasoline is the only thing that DOES burn for 99 days and we all know it was gone in the first 20 minutes.

:boxedin:
 
I am rarely wrong. So tell me what caused the fires under the rubble to last 99 days.
combustibles, 7 office buildings full of them. Are you going to tell us all those combustibles were removed before 99 days elapsed? Or are you going to assert ALL of those combustibles were fully consumed in less than 99 days? In a pit seven story's deep and three story's above ground in some places? Do you know anything about convection or draft? Are you aware that the pit was a hub of commuter PATH rail service and subway lines, a concourse and a pedestrian tunnel? And that these tunnels could be a source of oxygen for the underground fires?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom