I would never say they were powerful evidence against mass homicide, I am just saying they are weak evidence for mass homicide. They would certainly be consistent with mass homicide.
I must have not understood this earlier post of yours, which characterized the absence of gold teeth in the plunder lists NO-061 and NO-062:
And if there is no obvious entry for gold teeth, would that not provide powerful evidence against mass homicide in AR?
You seem to be shy about answering questions, or to have a strong preference for asking them. Anyway . . .
Mr Caution, can you clarify your position on the dental gold and the AR final statement.
Are you saying dental gold is on the final statement, if so what entry or included under what camoflague entry?
Of course not. You should read what I posted more carefully.
Or are you saying dental gold was deliberately excluded from the final profit statements. If so, why?
Given the other powerful evidence in favor of dental gold and its handling, I assume gold from teeth was lumped in with precious metals in the listing. In reports made in bureaucratic milieus, decisions about categories and groupings, sometimes truncating details and sometimes highlighting them, are common. And, as in this case, different decisions are made at different times; thus, in some documents the source of the gold is broken out (e.g., the directives memorandum from Frank), in others it isn't. To take a different example of this, neither NO-061 nor NO-062 mentions "women's hair" among the loot, whilst NO-1257 does so.
By quoting back to us the document, and asking me what you are to make of the point about Jewish stars, you avoid, of course, making any answer.
What do you make of the subject line?
"Betr.: Verwertung des Besitzes anlaesslich der An- und Aussiedlung der Juden"
"An" prefix has the strong conotation of a settlement into a defined locality, I think.
It is no surprise, nor is it incongruent with mass extermination, that Frank used the common euphemism of resettlement action. If you truly believe the nonsense you wrote about a defined locality, please define it for us. Where were the people--and not a handful of people--whose plunder is listed taken to and resettled, without any possessions at all, judging from the lists?
I will underscore that it is a rather strange evacuation that is camouflaged in one instance as confiscations from criminals and includes stripping the evacuees of their clothing, the females of their hair, and those with dental work of their gold teeth.
(We have been over and over this, as you know, euphemistic language in bureaucracy and the Third Reich as well as the destination of the supposedly resettled Jews. I am surprised you'd raise the latter, given your epic failures on the matter, which stand alongside OSR 24 as testimony to your dishonesty and bankruptcy.)
