Merged Continuation - 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
You haven't supported your argument. You claim that stage 1 buckled all of the columns in the section of WTC 7 that collapsed in stage 2, that all of that steel was buckled before it collapsed, hence the free fall. There is nothing to support this.

Just a side note: If you fix a column at the base and stand it straight upwards, at some length of column (depending on the material and the shape) the column would buckle and collapse under its own weight alone, with NO additional load on it aside from gravity.
 
Have you read about these hijackers? Hardly cold-blooded killer types according to their flight instructors. And they used these box cutters to open up jugulars did they?

A bigot? Getting desperate?

Wow... you really don't know anything about 9/11 do you?

Do you think that all 19 hijackers went to flight training?

Do you think the "muscle" went to flight training?

*********** Remarkable.
 
ROFLMAO..
LIE in the picture. The beams weren't shot straight sideways... they fell in an ARC... go back to school... math is your friend.


OMG...

so these explosions capable of throwing those steel beams... I'm sure EVERYONE with miles heard them right?

I once had a 500 lbs rock thrown over 500 feet from a blast that was happening next door. The blast was so loud that it was clearly heard a mile away. That is for 500 lbs, to be thrown 500 feet.

You are talking hundreds of TONS.... how much explosives would be required?

Now that argument from ignorance and incredulity has been dealt with... how about we focus on psa 1771...

focus

Pretty much anything thrown falls in an arc unless it sticks into an obstickale such as a building.
 
Just a side note: If you fix a column at the base and stand it straight upwards, at some length of column (depending on the material and the shape) the column would buckle and collapse under its own weight alone, with NO additional load on it aside from gravity.

Okay. :confused::duck:
 
If someone is claiming to know how many people it would take, then they must also be claiming a scenario in which this estimate was made. I wasn't asking for someone to make an estimate, I asked for an estimate that was already made.

UNless you come up with a plausible narrative, no one can come up with an estimate.


A bunch of weaklings overpowering 4 commercial airliners with exacto knives seems less likely to me.
Wowsers... ignorance and incredulity. cool.
weaklings?

Have you bothered to read the 9/11 CR, or the other fantastic references like Looming Tower, Perfect Soldiers, spying blind?

The four muscle terrorists on each flight were anything but weaklings.

overpowering 4 commercial airliners...
Did they fight EACH and every person? nope. They sat in first class and business which were very sparsely populated. They used mace/pepper spray as per betty ong, they grabbed someone and stabbed them (as per betty ong) and then (now it is supposition) used a very simple technique "open the door or I'll kill her/him" or even better, just probably opened the doors themselves.

Or are you saying the "top gun pilots" would be able to overcome 5 hijackers iwth knives? Can you fight someone if you are strapped into a seat and cannot stand?

what were the procedures for hijackings pre 9/11... you might want to look them up.

xacto knives? Oh... yes... box cutters, and four inch folding knives... Your ignorance and incredulity are amazing. Have you ever seen the kind of damage a boxcutter can do in a fight? especailly if you are strapped into a seat and can't stand up? especially if prior to 9/11 no one had ever killed the pilots by slicing their throats....

My students in china almost all carried box cutters for protection... they are cheap, easy to use, and have multiple purposes (like for cutting thing) but they are not illegal. Do some searches for box cutter fight pictures... they aren't pretty.

arguments from incredulity rejected...
I'll make you a deal... meet me in Dubai, we can rent a small room, I can strap you into a chair like the pilots seat and I can show you exactly how much damage an xacto knife, and a box cutter can do.... mkay? (of course you will have to sign a waiver for insurance purposes)

The US military and US intelligence agencies, however, specialize in compartmentalizing information, subverting security, and just generally being brutal.
Ah yes... the appeal to magic.
Even if they are masters of compartmentalizing... some people would be able to piece it together... There would be leaks.

of course now the US military are part of it too... I love the belief by folks that the military are mindless automotons who blindly follow orders, and of course US intelligence is black hearted spys who would order the deaths of their fellow citizens...

Your theory... who is involved, then we'll be happy to tell you an estimate.

Of course it also means anyone involved in the clean up is either a in on it b ignorant and stupid c completely clueless...

So for some to think this is "impossible" is just ridiculous.
You are right. It isn't "impossible." Do you know what else isn't impossible? It is fully possible for you to flip a coin 50 times straight and have them all land as heads. It is fully possible. the probability of it happening are soooooooo remote that for all intents and purposes it is "impossible." (ask any statistician). It isn't impossible to be struck by lightening. twice.... or thrice... or even seven times. (which has happened to one man) but for all intents and purposes it is so remote that it is "impossible" that you would be struck by lightening more than 2x. Many things are possible that are so remote.

The purpose isn't to find any possibility. But to find one that a. fits the evidence we have b. that has any possibility of occuring c. that explains the events in a simpler manner... nothing any truther has ever come up with does that. why not?

And no, I'm not interested in coming up with a narrative. I'm not a storyteller, nor am I claiming that the conspiracy was less than complex. Someone claimed to know how many people it would take and I wanted more information about that.

ah yes... the no claimer... a rare bird. Unfortunately the burden of proof is on the claimant. That would be YOU and the truth movement. The common narrative explains the events of the day very well, it follows the KISS rule of military operations and it flows logically...

So give us a theory, and I'll happily give you a rough estimate of the number of people who would HAVE to be involved in some direct way, and others who would have to be involved indirectly.

Wires in building debris? Stop the presses.

Since the wires used for detonating explosives are VERY specific... yes... stop the presses. They don't just "blend in." That leaves out all of the wrappings, the left over explosives, the residue of explosives, the tell tale damage to the columns.....

argument from ignorance (do you have any other type of arguments?)


Frankly, we don't know what type of explosives would have been used. It's commonly believed that the US military has the most advanced technology on the planet, so comparing this type of job with a commercial one is valueless.

Appeal to magic fallacy... yet again.
Explosives follow certain chemical rules... feel free to find an explosive that is capable of cutting steel that doesn't... I'm sure the Nobel committee would love to hear about it.

And back to the mindless automotons in the military with no conscious... Yup... they would willingly murder 3000 civilians... (your ignorance and incredulity are showing again)

Your entire argument is predicated on conjecture.

Not at all..

but if I conjecture
1. you have never served in the military and don't know much about it.
2. you have no idea about construction or more importantly demolitions
3. you are terrified that some random individual would be willing to murder you just because you are different.
4. that you feel that it is easier to blame "them" "da gubmint" for all the problems in your own life instead of taking responsibility for your own actions and failings.
5. that you hate the US (or maybe it was GWB) so much that instead of using any type of thought processes which starts with the simpliest explaination, you have to construct massive fantasies filled with mindless automotons who would murder you because they follow orders, with a set of ruthless blackhearted individuals above them... What a terrifying world you must live in....
 
Have you read about these hijackers? Hardly cold-blooded killer types according to their flight instructors. And they used these box cutters to open up jugulars did they?

A bigot? Getting desperate?

You obviously haven't read anything about the hijackers.

I'd recommend you start with 911myths.com and then read up on the hijackers.

it isn't hard.

Knowledge is power
and against your ignorance and incredulity it would smash it flat... go educate yourself.
 
Have you read about these hijackers? Hardly cold-blooded killer types according to their flight instructors. And they used these box cutters to open up jugulars did they?

A bigot? Getting desperate?

And yet those who were (according to you ) "Hardly cold-blooded killer types according to their flight instructors"
flew 4 aircraft into 3 buildings and a field killing nearly 3000 innocent people..
And the 'muscle' didn't get flying training.
You have to stop inventing scenarios
 
Have you read about these hijackers? Hardly cold-blooded killer types according to their flight instructors. And they used these box cutters to open up jugulars did they?

A bigot? Getting desperate?

You are soooo right. Box cutters (not to metnion 4 inch folding blades) are completely harmless...
ETA
OOPS... wrong URLS. Fixed.

http://www.beta.cjonline.com/news/state/2010-11-18/trial_set_in_box_cutter_murder
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/bo...ning-tram-attack/story-e6frf7jo-1225842322389
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/local-breaking-news/virginia/snowball-leads-to-cut-throat-p.html
http://www.kansascity.com/2011/06/13/2948429/police-arrest-man-suspected-of.html
http://slumz.boxden.com/f5/oct-17-mans-throat-slit-box-cutter-over-color-bandana-orlando-778479/

Yup... perfectly safe.... I can post images of the damages a box cutter can do to a person... they are rather gross and NSFW....
 
Last edited:
Just a side note: If you fix a column at the base and stand it straight upwards, at some length of column (depending on the material and the shape) the column would buckle and collapse under its own weight alone, with NO additional load on it aside from gravity.

And, if you laterally supported the column, at some point, the column would fail from compression failure from its own weight.

Just more to confuse the troofers with :jaw-dropp
 
Pretty much anything thrown falls in an arc unless it sticks into an obstickale such as a building.

<facepalm>

But your image claims the steel that we see falling in an ARC outwards (which is explained by the ROOSD theory proposed by Major Tom (besides for his trying to back CD into it) is in fact being shot horizontally. It isn't. It is falling out and away from the towers.

No explosive capable of throwing materials the mass you describe would be silent. Please present any video within a quarter mile of the collapses which you can hear the explosives on it...

i can present the video where a 500 lbs rock was thrown 500 feet (we were at 500 feet from the explosive) and it is easily the loudest thing on the tape... in fact the audio filters had to come in...

it should be easy. Your lying photo has bit you in the ass again.

so now that that is finished, lets get back on topic. PSA 1771 and your BS about flight 93. Have you figured out PSA 1771 yet?
 
You haven't supported your argument. You claim that stage 1 buckled all of the columns in the section of WTC 7 that collapsed in stage 2, that all of that steel was buckled before it collapsed, hence the free fall. There is nothing to support this.

In other words, you're making claims that aren't supported, neither by you nor any report.

By the end of phase 1, the north face had moved downwards quite a bit down across its entire width.

This can only happen if indeed all north face columns, from the westernmost to the easternmost, had buckeld further below. Not a single exception.

So yes, we do know 100% as fact that "all of the columns in the section of WTC 7 that collapsed in stage 2, that all of that steel was buckled before it collapsed, hence the free fall."
 
By the end of phase 1, the north face had moved downwards quite a bit down across its entire width.

This can only happen if indeed all north face columns, from the westernmost to the easternmost, had buckeld further below. Not a single exception.

So yes, we do know 100% as fact that "all of the columns in the section of WTC 7 that collapsed in stage 2, that all of that steel was buckled before it collapsed, hence the free fall."

No you don't. You have no evidence of that, and for the most part, what you said doesn't even make sense. Once collapse is initiated, columns meet the upward force applied by the ground (and growing debris pile) below them. There is no evidence that all of these columns had already buckled before encountering this force. If you have it, show it. You'd think NIST would have demonstrated such evidence when they admitted free fall in the first place. They didn't.
 
No you don't. You have no evidence of that, and for the most part, what you said doesn't even make sense. Once collapse is initiated, columns meet the upward force applied by the ground (and growing debris pile) below them. There is no evidence that all of these columns had already buckled before encountering this force. If you have it, show it. You'd think NIST would have demonstrated such evidence when they admitted free fall in the first place. They didn't.

It's not our fault you can't envision this process. Please go watch things fail catastrophically and get back to us. TY :)
 
Have you read about these hijackers? Hardly cold-blooded killer types according to their flight instructors.


You realize that "he was always so quiet" comments about murderers are so common as to be cliché and are said to express the person's surprise that the murderer could do such a thing, right?

And, really, if you're planning mass murder, it's probably best not to act like a mass murderer before engaging in the act.
 
Last edited:
Have you read about these hijackers? Hardly cold-blooded killer types according to their flight instructors. And they used these box cutters to open up jugulars did they?

This lame argument is beneath even you, tempesta29. If only those hijackers would have acted more like mass murderers, you'd be more apt to believe they were, huh?

LOL
 
Once collapse is initiated, columns meet the upward force applied by the ground (and growing debris pile) below them.

Meeting the upward force of the ground requires a continuous load path to transmit the loads through the columns that are resisting the falling mass. If you have buckling, or eccentricity on those structural components there is no direct path for the loads to be transmitted to the ground and the column(s) will buckle at their weakest point.

There is no evidence that all of these columns had already buckled before encountering this force.
But there is plenty of evidence that the underlying causes that lead to buckling were present and at work. There is also plenty of evidence suggesting that you are not versed in any form of engineering; those are very basic considerations to demonstrate if you have any intention of suggesting that the collapse through the officially accepted line of events is impossible.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom