1. It was not mentioned in Hinksley's majestic 4 volume survey of British Intelligence in 1980 - despite many other incriminating decodes being discussed.
It hadn't been declassified yet, of course, unless you can cite documents from Hinksley's book that were still classified in 1980.
Can you? Yes or no?
2. The 14 week period reporting period suspiciously falls on the last day of the year - to allow an exact matching with the Korherr report.
That's because Korherr likely worked off the same sources.
Your analogy would be along the lines of: "Gee, Matthew and Luke both mention how this Jesus guy was born in Bethlehem but lived in Nazareth. Must be a conspiracy!"
Yeah. Or they worked off the same source. Which, they did. A source called "Mark."
3. The Korherr report includes separate categories for Polish Jews and Western European Jews - many of the later who supposedly went through AR camps - eg a number of transports from Thereseinstadt and transports to Izbica that are supposed to have been shipped straight on to Sobibor. This would represent a large and unacceptable measure of double counting.
Nice try. You're counting "Western Europe" together with the Reich. Can't do that. The Reich, including Bohemia & Moravia, is counted separately also.
4. There is no oral testimony of 12 000 being liquidated at Majdanek during the last 14 days of 1942. Considering the large number of survivors from Majdanek this is surprising. Hoaxsters try to hand wave this away as perhaps lots of small liquidations were taking place in outer camps. But provide no evidence to support this claim.
I don't believe you, for one thing, that no oral testimony exists on this. Let's assume, for the moment, that you're telling the truth. Why would this matter to people like you, who are always so quick to tell us how unreliable eyewitness testimony is.
5. There is a documented train freeze for deportations over this fourteen days to accommodate Wehrmacht leave. Although there does exist a request for a limited relaxation of this freeze - specifically 3 trains. The context of this request makes clear it was for moving Winterhilfe materials not deportations. There is no evidence to show this request was granted.
You have to cite such things. Your allegations of them are worthless.
Again, assuming you're correct, the train freeze would only apply to trains running west from the Lublin district, would it not?
6. A number of survivors from Belzec testify to it being a work camp only and not an AR camp.
A number, eh?
Two is "a number"?
Aside from Rudolf Reder there is no survivor testimony of Belzec as an AR camp
Tell everyone here what happened to the other man who survived Belzec, Bunny.
Do it now. Your failure to do so will only underscore your dishonesty.
and Reder can be shown to be given testimony explicitly not consistent with alleged engine exhaust gassings.
Well, we can discuss this in detail if you'd like, as your merely alleging this proves nothing.
Tellingly, West German justice failed to secure any convictions in relation to Belzec.
Bunny, please tell everyone here who Josef Oberhauser was and why I'm asking you this. Do this now also.
Or you can point us to the relevant footage in
Shoah. Your choice.
There exists decodes that refer to Belzec specifically as a work camp. Finally Order Police War Diaries show that at least two ghettos that are supposed to have been deported to Belzec, instead went to two different, hitherto unheard of locations.
Again: You're going to need to cite things. I have seen you try your sleight-of-hand with names of camps, so I'm unconvinced.
Off the top of my head, that explains why subjectively I don't find the Hoefle telegram in anyway convincing.
So you tell some great big lies, say some more completely unsubstantiated things, and we should believe you?
You know, despite your desire to appear intellectual, you're as much a filthy liar as the rest of the denier crowd.
