Rick Santorum: "In it to win it."

The emphasis on his wife on the website is comical ("Meet Rick and Family"). Being associated with the fluid santorum must have forced to former senator to desperately display his heterosexuality.
 
However nasty Santorum may be, he's nothing you can't defeat by putting a towel down first.

Yes, that's why he chose this fellow as campaign manager:

vince1.jpg
 
So when he finally throws in the towel, make sure you're wearing gloves if you pick it up.

As a general rule, if you're doing anything that requires gloves, you've graduated well past towels and should be putting down a tarp.
 
What's the recipe for America America? And what happened to the last batch that he needs to make another? Did he drop it, or use the wrong icing? And if he's really fighting to make some, is it because he's stirring by hand? He should buy a mixer, they're pretty cheap and you get much better results. I made Canada Canada for a party, and it took me less than fifteen minutes because I used a mixer.

He left it out in the rain and can never find that recipe again.
 
He left it out in the rain and can never find that recipe again.

You're late to the party, we've finished with the cake and have moved into
Edited by kmortis: 
Removed inappropriate terminology
.

Which is the 1996 Republican convention all over again, really.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think Santorum may have just beat out Sarah Palin's remarks about Paul Revere for foolishness:

Santorum: D-Day Troops Fought For Health Care Freedom

Newly minted GOP presidential candidate Rick Santorum is appalled that President Obama would disrespect those who fought at Normandy by not trusting them to make their own health care decisions. "Those Americans risked everything so they could make that decision on their health care plan," he said Monday.
 

Attachments

  • ICHC_facepalm1.jpg
    ICHC_facepalm1.jpg
    26.6 KB · Views: 8
Considering that veterans have their own healthcare system run by the government and paid for by taxes, I can't imagine what exactly Santorum is frothing about.
 
He's Santorum, by definition he has to froth.

I think it's childish and inaccurate to compare the man to the substance bearing his name. Because, after all, the presence of the substance implies that somebody's getting some kind of enjoyment or benefit, and there is no evidence that Mr Santorum has ever been a source of joy or benefit to anyone.
 
I think it's childish and inaccurate to compare the man to the substance bearing his name. Because, after all, the presence of the substance implies that somebody's getting some kind of enjoyment or benefit, and there is no evidence that Mr Santorum has ever been a source of joy or benefit to anyone.

But the presence of the substance might also imply that someone just had a very painful experience and there is plenty of evidence that Mr. Santorum has been the source of that.
 
But the presence of the substance might also imply that someone just had a very painful experience and there is plenty of evidence that Mr. Santorum has been the source of that.

I'd say the absence of the substance and the presence of one but not both of its two components would be an indication of a painful experience. The purpose of the second component is to prevent the experience from being painful.
 

Back
Top Bottom