Rick Santorum: "In it to win it."

Bikewer said:
It was sex columnist Dan Savage that came up with that "definition"....
Click to expand...
I think he asked his readers to send in their suggestions, and that was the best one. He certainly poopularized it.
 
I'm too lazy to Google it. What precisely did Senator Santorum say that prompted Mr. Savage's response?
 
And I say good for Savage. Why should Santorum be allowed to run his mouth about homosexuals being deviants and tools of the devil and expect no backlash?

Times have changed. Gays are out of the closet, they're not going back in and they have had just about enough of some of the rhetoric that gets thrown around. And good for them. They're people like anyone and deserve every right the rest of us enjoy.

Rick disagrees with that. Publicly. And he would use the positions of power he once had and is trying to have again to make his intolerant views a matter of public policy.

That's why for the rest of his life his name and the name he passed down to his children will be synonymous with that frothy, frothy mixture...
 
Ladewig said:
I'm too lazy to Google it. What precisely did Senator Santorum say that prompted Mr. Savage's response?
Click to expand...
He declared that gays should not be given the same rights as real human beings, because then we'd have to legalize "man-on-dog" stuff and all kinds of preeee-versions.

(The "man-on-dog" is a direct quote, the rest is paraphrased.)
 
Santorum might not be in the lead now, but he's sure to come from behind.
 
Even though most people don't know right now, I see it as likely that people will get Santorum all over this country, eventually.
 
Tony said:
Most. Unintentionally. Gay. Campaign. Slogan. Ever.
Click to expand...

I can't think any slogan involving Sick Rantorum that doesn't sound dirty. But maybe that's just a reflection of my mind.
 
Brainster said:
Santorum's the Republican Kucinich. He'll provide some entertainment value, but won't be a factor.
Click to expand...

Well, he could be a factor in the sense that he'll make the rest of the GOP look like fools by making such inane statements as those referenced here. That is, unless the more reasonable Republican candidates risk the wrath of the Tea Party wing of the GOP and denounce those same stupid statements.

But then, that means that those more reasonable candidates run the risk of not winning all-important GOP primaries due to the Tea Party backlash. And thus is revealed the conundrum which the Republicans have constructed for themselves.
 
I worry about reasonable republican candidates about as much as I worry about unicorn horn infections.
 
If Rick Santorum is so upset that "America is no longer America" he could always just do the rest of us a favor and, say, leave the country.
 
I am baffled. If one googles santorum, the first two responses are for the slang word and only the third response refers to Rick Santorum. How could anyone look at results like those and say 2012 will be a good year for me to run for president?
 
Ladewig said:
I am baffled. If one googles santorum, the first two responses are for the slang word and only the third response refers to Rick Santorum. How could anyone look at results like those and say 2012 will be a good year for me to run for president?
Click to expand...

People who support Rick Santorum aren't exactly big on 'research'.
 
PGH said:
I worry about reasonable republican candidates about as much as I worry about unicorn horn infections.
Click to expand...
Can santorum spread disease to unicorn's horns? Or horny unicorns for that matter?

We'll have to spread out and look into that matter.
 
Ladewig said:
I am baffled as to why the senator would say to himself, "this is not an insurmountable problem."
Click to expand...

Because he's provided ample evidence of being a delusional man?
 
He needs to go with the flow.

Hire Marquis de Carabas as a speechwriter.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom