• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Osama bin Laden dead,

aggle-rithm said:
So you only agree with the FIRST part of #3...so the second part, "al Qaeda doesn't really care if others fabricate stories about al Qaeda that make them appear weak", you disagree with.

How are those two beliefs compatible? If someone else is speaking for al Qaeda and making them look weak, why doesn't al Qaeda speak up about it?

Do you think this group of homocidal maniacs is just shy?
Click to expand...

No, it's just that your questions are ridiculous. How could I know what AQ cares about? The more important question is how was the post attributed to AQ verified? Does it matter to you at all that it has not been?
 
I wish I could have been the one to whack that evil piece of crap. I would have laughed while watching him die. Preferably in a lot of pain. Maybe I should have joined the Navy.
 
JihadJane said:
It has been estimated that al Qaeda is responsible for around five thousand civilian deaths worldwide, a small amount when compared, for example, to those killed by the US military machine during the last half century.
Click to expand...

So because the US has killed people before in wars, that makes AQ killing civilians in terror attacks acceptable.

Got it.


Not really, he looks very human in my eyes. He is typical of humans who use violence to gain power.
Click to expand...

So when Islamic terrorists kill people, they're only "humans" acting normal, but when the US is at war, they're evil capitalist monsters and that is intolerable.

Got it.

And you say you are not a terrorist apologist... noooo....
 
Last edited:
Several posts have been moved to Abandon All Hope. Please stick to the topic of the thread, folks, which is not other members' user names or where other members live or details of other members' lives.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: LashL
 
Pardalis said:
So because the US has killed people before in wars, that makes AQ killing civilians in terror attacks acceptable.

Got it.




So when Islamic terrorists kill people, they're only "humans" acting normal, but when the US is at war, they're evil capitalist monsters and that is intolerable.

Got it.

And you say you are not a terrorist apologist... noooo....
Click to expand...
The USA is the Great Satan,you know. I've never understood what that is supposed to mean. How can a country be like a mythological character?
 
Last edited:
dafydd said:
The USA is the Great Satan,you know. I've never understood what that is supposed to mean. How can a country be like a mythological character?
Click to expand...

Give it some further thought and insight may occur!

You seem happy enough with your dragons.
 
Last edited:
dtugg said:
I wish I could have been the one to whack that evil piece of crap. I would have laughed while watching him die. Preferably in a lot of pain. Maybe I should have joined the Navy.
Click to expand...

Maybe you should apply as a drone pilot.
They pilot them from Las Vegas.

Sweeet!
 
RedIbis said:
So then how did OBL communicate with AQ leadership? Carrier pigeon? And no speculation please, refer to a source.
Click to expand...

A truther asking for a source. Priceless,when you consider that the main truther source is an orifice normally used for other purposes. I doubt if Bin Liner made sure that posterity would know how he communicated. Who cares how he chatted to the other terrorist loonies? He's dead,and that is all that matters. Why are you so aerated about it? Do you miss him?
 
RedIbis said:
So then how did OBL communicate with AQ leadership? Carrier pigeon? And no speculation please, refer to a source.
Click to expand...

Well, considering the compound where OBL was found had no internet or phone connections, I would say that another form was used.

And don't call his do-boys pigeons. That's not nice.



But, in all honesty, it was most likely through directions typed on a computer/recoded on video/audio, and put on a small thumb drive, and sent out of the compound. But hey, that's just me.....
 
triforcharity said:
Well, considering the compound where OBL was found had no internet or phone connections, I would say that another form was used.

And don't call his do-boys pigeons. That's not nice.



But, in all honesty, it was most likely through directions typed on a computer/recoded on video/audio, and put on a small thumb drive, and sent out of the compound. But hey, that's just me.....
Click to expand...

We can take it as read that he was in touch with his murderous cronies. Exactly how does not matter one whit. He's dead,crack open the champagne.
 
triforcharity said:
Well, considering the compound where OBL was found had no internet or phone connections, I would say that another form was used.

And don't call his do-boys pigeons. That's not nice.



But, in all honesty, it was most likely through directions typed on a computer/recoded on video/audio, and put on a small thumb drive, and sent out of the compound. But hey, that's just me.....
Click to expand...

You missed the part where I asked you to please not speculate.
 
dtugg said:
I wish I could have been the one to whack that evil piece of crap. I would have laughed while watching him die. Preferably in a lot of pain. Maybe I should have joined the Navy.
Click to expand...

wow.....
to quote arlo guthrie, "i wanna eat dead burned bodies..feel veins in my teeth.."


the u.s. military really needs you.
you'd best just go and sign up.
 
RedIbis said:
So then how did OBL communicate with AQ leadership? Carrier pigeon? And no speculation please, refer to a source.
Click to expand...
Are you aware that long-distance communication had taken place long before the invention of the telephone?
RedIbis said:
You missed the part where I asked you to please not speculate.
Click to expand...

Why should anyone have to provide specific details to refute your argument? It's your argument. If you need to prove that Bin Laden never used any form of non-phone communication, then go ahead and prove it. Waiting for others to prove you wrong is a thinly-veiled argument from ignorance.

And all the while, you ask others not to speculate. That's all you've been doing. Where's your evidence?
 
I Am The Scum said:
Are you aware that long-distance communication had taken place long before the invention of the telephone?


Why should anyone have to provide specific details to refute your argument? It's your argument. If you need to prove that Bin Laden never used any form of non-phone communication, then go ahead and prove it. Waiting for others to prove you wrong is a thinly-veiled argument from ignorance.

And all the while, you ask others not to speculate. That's all you've been doing. Where's your evidence?
Click to expand...

Where does your evidence about bin Laden come from?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom