• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Osama bin Laden dead,

And the predictable, typical responses ensue...
Yoda: Until body I see, belive it I will not.
Click to expand...
StormedTrooper: Why are we still giving aid to Tatooine? They probably knew of Kenobi's existence the whole time and even helped him! That whole planet is just a big hive of scum and villainy.
Click to expand...
I love how the liberal rag GET keeps referring our Defense Star as the "Death Star". Take that propaganda back to Courescant, Nerfherder!!!
Click to expand...
 
Pardalis said:
Why do you think he targets them then? Why does he target civilians, and use them as missiles?

Or do you consider the African US embassy victims, and the 9/11 victims "combatants", and fair game?
Click to expand...

Jihad Jane, your attention please.
 
JihadJane said:
I'm still wondering what your point is. What is it?

As shown below, I asked Marcus what his presumption was based on. Your links answered that question. What more is there to say than what I have already said?








Do you think that childish attempts to patronize increase your credibility or enhance our communication? (rhetorical question)

:con2:
Click to expand...

He's doing his best considering your lack of reading comprehension. He can't make it any simpler.
 
Jihad Jane, please choose one of the following explanations as to why al Qaeda would confirm bin Laden's recent death:

1. al Qaeda is in on it
2. al Qaeda believes everything the US government tells it
3. The confirmation was not from al Qaeda, and al Qaeda doesn't really care if others fabricate stories about al Qaeda that make them appear weak
4. bin Laden was actually killed years ago, but al Qaeda is just getting around to making the announcement
5. Any plausible explanation you can come up with.
 
Last edited:
aggle-rithm said:
Jihad Jane, please choose one of the following explanations as to why al Qaeda would confirm bin Laden's recent death:

1. al Qaeda is in on it
2. al Qaeda believes everything the US government tells it
3. The confirmation was not from al Qaeda, and al Qaeda doesn't really care if others fabricate stories about al Qaeda that make them appear weak
4. bin Laden was actually killed years ago, but al Qaeda is just getting around to making the announcement
5. Any plausible explanation you can come up with.
Click to expand...

My opinion is that the first part of #3 is the strongest possibility, especially since AQ's statement comes from a posting on an internet forum and cannot be independently verified.

ETA: Besides, as I've posted before, unless AQ had evidence, they know as much about his death as the American people.
 
Last edited:
JihadJane said:
What is his point?
Click to expand...

The point is, Jihad, is that you asked for evidence that the WH said what they said, after reading whatthe WH said.

And when I called you on it, you feigned ignorance, and ran around like a petulant child with your fingers in your ears.

LALALALALALAICANTHEARYOU!!!!

What part of this do you not understand?

(Readers Digenst version)

Poster: The WH isn't going to release the photos to avoid offending muslims.
JJ: How did you reach that conclusion?
Me: Because the White House said so. (Posts 3 links.)
JJ: Links documenting White House statements....
Me: Did you not read the links? (quotes sections relating to the topic of discussion, word for word, from the sources already provided)
JJ: What's your point, triforcharity?
Me: What is there NOT to get?


Jihad, Will you FINALLY admit that the WH is NOT going to release the photos of OBL's dead body because they do not want to incite violence amoung the Muslims? Will you FINALLY admit that you the WH said that exact thing, based on statements from the WH?

Will you admit that you were wrong in asking for additional evidence, when clear and concise evidence was presented, with DIRECT QUOTES, that the WH did in fact say what was claimed?

Will you Jihad? Or will you continue running in circles with your fingers in year ears?
 
zooterkin said:
You don't think it's likely that they would be in touch with their own leader, then?
Click to expand...

I can see it now.......

Terrorist 1 : Hey, who forgot to pay the light bill?
Terrorist 2 : Osama is supposed to do that. No worries though.
T1- But, how are we supposed to plan our next evil plan?
T2: I dunno, who cares. Just do whatever you want.
T1: Can we send a runner to OBL and ask him to pay AQ Power and Light for us?
T2: Nah, no worries.


Six months go by............

Terrorist 3: (Walks into room?) Hey, how come OBL didn't pay the light bill?
T1&2 : Dunno, never called him.
T3: WHAT THE **** IS WRONG WITH YOU MORONS!! HOLY BURKAHAS MAN!! WHERE DID THEY FIND YOU TWO IDIOTS!!


Yeah, that makes perfect sense there Red. :rolleyes:
 
triforcharity said:
The point is, Jihad, is that you asked for evidence that the WH said what they said, after reading whatthe WH said.

And when I called you on it, you feigned ignorance, and ran around like a petulant child with your fingers in your ears.

LALALALALALAICANTHEARYOU!!!!

What part of this do you not understand?

(Readers Digenst version)

Poster: The WH isn't going to release the photos to avoid offending muslims...
Click to expand...

No, the poster said he that he presumed this was the reason. I wanted to know why he presumed it. I am informed that White House statements expressed that view . My question answered.


...JJ: How did you reach that conclusion?
Me: Because the White House said so. (Posts 3 links.)
JJ: Links documenting White House statements....
Me: Did you not read the links? (quotes sections relating to the topic of discussion, word for word, from the sources already provided)
JJ: What's your point, triforcharity?
Me: What is there NOT to get?


Jihad, Will you FINALLY admit that the WH is NOT going to release the photos of OBL's dead body because they do not want to incite violence amoung the Muslims?
Click to expand...

I haven't contested that the White House issued this statement.

Will you FINALLY admit that you the WH said that exact thing, based on statements from the WH?

Will you admit that you were wrong in asking for additional evidence, when clear and concise evidence was presented, with DIRECT QUOTES, that the WH did in fact say what was claimed?

Will you Jihad?
Click to expand...

Do you have a problem with "Jane"?

Or will you continue running in circles with your fingers in year ears?
Click to expand...

We seem to be talking at cross purposes.

I have not contested that Marcus' presumption is matched by the White House statements.

I just don't presume that White House statements necessarily represent truth, partially or wholly.
 
None of this matters,the evil bugger is still dead. Let's all go and have a drink.
 
JihadJane said:
No, the poster said he that he presumed this was the reason. I wanted to know why he presumed it. I am informed that White House statements expressed that view . My question answered.
Click to expand...

So why would you ask for evidence???? You seem to not understand what you typed.

JihadJane said:
I haven't contested that the White House issued this statement.
Click to expand...

So asking for evidence wasn't questioning the statement? What was it then?


JihadJane said:
Do you have a problem with "Jane"?
Click to expand...

What's wrong with calling me Triforcharity?

It's called an abbreviation. Does it bother you that I refer to you as Jihad? If it does, then you should change your name.


JihadJane said:
We seem to be talking at cross purposes.
Click to expand...

You seem to have a funny way of being clear as to what you were asking. Which, I highly doubt that was the case, but, there is no way to prove it. Just my personal opinion Jihad.


JihadJane said:
I have not contested that Marcus' presumption is matched by the White House statements.
Click to expand...

So, why would you ask for evidence? I mean, you could have just said "why do you presume, that's what the WH said." That would make more sense than what you typed.


JihadJane said:
I just don't presume that White House statements necessarily represent truth, partially or wholly.
Click to expand...

What evidence do you have to support this position?
 
RedIbis said:
My opinion is that the first part of #3 is the strongest possibility, especially since AQ's statement comes from a posting on an internet forum and cannot be independently verified.

ETA: Besides, as I've posted before, unless AQ had evidence, they know as much about his death as the American people.
Click to expand...

So you only agree with the FIRST part of #3...so the second part, "al Qaeda doesn't really care if others fabricate stories about al Qaeda that make them appear weak", you disagree with.

How are those two beliefs compatible? If someone else is speaking for al Qaeda and making them look weak, why doesn't al Qaeda speak up about it?

Do you think this group of homocidal maniacs is just shy?
 
aggle-rithm said:
So you only agree with the FIRST part of #3...so the second part, "al Qaeda doesn't really care if others fabricate stories about al Qaeda that make them appear weak", you disagree with.

How are those two beliefs compatible? If someone else is speaking for al Qaeda and making them look weak, why doesn't al Qaeda speak up about it?

Do you think this group of homocidal maniacs is just shy?
Click to expand...

They've been real shrinking violets up until now. It just shows you how desperate the few remaining truthers are if this is the best they can come up with.
 
JihadJane said:
'Osama bin Laden's guns found "only after" US Navy Seals killed him'
Click to expand...

Who'da thunk: a reporter doesn't know the laws of war. Will wonders never cease?

It doesn't matter if bin Laden was armed at the time or not. He was a legitimate military target. We were under no legal obligation to try to capture him, armed OR unarmed. Which should come as no surprise since we were under no obligation to even determine whether he was armed or unarmed. There simply is no legitimate legal argument for claiming that his killing was illegal.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom