go do your own legwork sunshine.Oh Jesus, has someone announced a prize for the most creative excuse and I didn't hear about it?
I think on an internet forum nobody expects you to write a tome, but a handful of bullet points describing these obligations you think are both important and applicable would be appropriate.
Can you manage that? Or are we safe in assuming that whatever they do after statehood will be fine by you just as whatever they do before statehood is? Can you commit to an opinion?
Is this forum some kind of meeting point for parallel universes, one the normal sane world of evidence, one a bizarro world where mind reading really works and you can tell each other what everyone else thinks.
I do have Mycroft on ignore, he is pretty much the Matt Giwer of your side.
here is a tip.I can't read anyone's mind, but I can read what they write on an internet message board. If you can't tell what someone thinks by reading thousands of their messages telling you what they think...then the written language itself is pointless.
go do your own legwork sunshine.
seriously, I have got better things to to than list all the obligations of statehood under international law...
and seriously son.....which international laws do you think are unimportant or not applicable? I think they are all important and applicable.
so....sorry, they are all international laws and I don't think a palestinian state should be treated differently than any other state in their application
I notice that you are completely ignoring the question about saddams Iraq....you remember? the one that where you didn't see any "rules" applied? amazingly avoiding seeing sanctions and invasion/s.![]()
Where did it happen?
What is the nationality/ethnicity of the people involved?
What is the title of this thread?
here is a tip.
If you want to make a case regarding someones views then actually quote the examples you use to come to your conclusions....ranting about un-named groups and assigning opinions to them just doesn't cut it on a skeptic forum......sorry about that.
so, next week, if hamas were to nuke tel aviv, we would be discussing it in the "General Israel/Palestine discussion thread"?
riiiight.![]()
Okay, so you missed the part about condensing them to a few bullet points.
So when I asked if you would commit to an opinion, the answer is "no".
So...since there is no international law against killing Jews you won't be protesting if they continue that practice.
Funny, I remember nobody doing squat when Saddam invaded Iran or when Saddam dropped nerve gas on his own citizens.
Are those the rules you will expect Palestinians to abide by? Get away with whatever you can until you tick off the big-guy too much? That's not exactly a recipe for peace.
So...since there is no international law against killing Jews you won't be protesting if they continue that practice.
So...why would the world media ignore such an important story broken by Gaza TV?
By the way, the "moderate" Abbas declared today the Palestinians will never "cease struggling" until Israel is destroyed through the "right of return".
So I'll take that as a no then, and work on the idea that you were using the whole stolen land argument as a rhetorical device. nothing more.
Cheers
"A Palestinian teenager was shot dead during protests in Jerusalem on Friday. Police said it was unclear who had shot him and they were investigating."
Want to bet that this one Palestinian death will cause wide international condemnation, and "peace activists" will take to the streets, while Syria and Bahrain are killing hundreds every week and no "peace activist" says anything?
until Israel officially recognizes the right of a Palestinian state in most of the WB, EJ, and all of Gaza, the Palestinians are really under no moral obligation to officially recognize Israel.
How about their Parliaments simply swap recognition letters?
sure...israel shoots a bunch of unarmed people...best just sweep it under the carpet....
maybe no one'll notice.
It was a deliberate provocation to get people killed.
But it won't happen, since Abbas and his parliament refuse to recognize a Jewish state and refuse to give up on the "right of return" -- that is, the right to destroy Israel in stages.
It was a deliberate provocation to get people killed.