JFrankA
Illuminator
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2006
- Messages
- 4,054
What is your "good" definition?
What is your "good' definition of theism?
Is it this: Theism isn’t "a lack of belief in no god”, it’s a lack of acceptance of atheists belief in no god?
What is your "good" definition?
No - Atheism is the non-acceptance/rejection of the beliefs and claims of Theists. Given these beliefs and claims aren‘t supported by a single piece of credible evidence there‘s absolutely nothing for Atheists to “lack belief in“ other than the beliefs and claims.
The belief that a god or gods have actual existence.What is your "good' definition of theism?
No - Theism isn’t a response to Atheism. Atheism is purely a response to TheismIs it this: Theism isn’t "a lack of belief in no god”, it’s a lack of acceptance of atheists belief in no god?
The belief that a god or gods have actual existence.
No - Theism isn’t a response to Atheism. Atheism is purely a response to Theism
Wait.
If that is true, why are children taught to learn about a god, most likely a god that the parents believe in?
(1) Provide at least one piece of credible evidence to support the theistic claim that a god exists.
Or . . .
(2) End Theism.
(1) Provide at least one piece of credible evidence to support the theistic claim that a god exists.
Or . . .
(2) End Theism.
Atheism is the non-acceptance/rejection of theistic claims. You can’t reject claims that aren’t being made. Theism and Atheism would become purely historic.
The *concept* of gods still exists.

I think I spotted a flaw in this plan.(1) Provide at least one piece of credible evidence to support the theistic claim that a god exists.
No, it's a lack of theism, a lack of belief in god. If theism becomes historic, then atheism becomes the norm.
Atheism only exists as a response to Theism.
Ending Theism would also end Atheism.
No. Without theism, atheism would be universal, not ended.
Atheism is simply not believing in gods. It is independent of belief in gods.
Atheism is a lack of theism.No - Theism isn’t a response to Atheism. Atheism is purely a response to Theism
As the word Atheism is derived from the word theism I don't accept that it's simply not believing in gods. Atheism by definition is a response to theism. Atheism is not independent of belief in gods, it's a direct rejection of the validity of belief in gods. Believing in gods or not isn't a choice Atheist have to or can make as it's a complete non-issue. Not having a belief in gods is being a Realist not an Atheist.
Ending theism is a miracle that only God can perform. That's the Catch 22.(1) Provide at least one piece of credible evidence to support the theistic claim that a god exists.
Or . . .
(2) End Theism.
Ending theism is a miracle that only God can perform. That's the Catch 22.
Since atheism is a minor religion with a negligible effect on the global systems of belief, the theists will not provide anything suggested in (1).
If the salvation of critical thought actually worked, as the atheists believe it does, your OP wouldn't materialize.