Merged More proof of WTC demolitions/controlled explosives

walkyrie said:
PROOF THAT THE THERMAL AND GRAVITATIONAL ENERGY
AVAILABLE WERE INSUFFICIENT TO MELT STEEL IN THE TWIN
TOWERS AND 7 WORLD TRADE CENTER ON 9/11/01

By Terry Morrone.
Professor Emeritus of Physics, Adelphi University

Conclusions

Since there was molten steel in the wreckage of the World Trade Center,
and since the temperatures of the fires were insufficient to melt steel, and since
the gravitational energy was shown to be very much smaller than the energy
needed to melt steel, the Twin Towers and 7 WTC could only have been brought down by explosives or cutter charges.


http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200704/ProfMorroneOnMeltingWTCsteel.pdf
Click to expand...

Wow. Three lies in a single sentence. Not even worth clicking the link.
 
two lies gravitational energy was very much smaller than the energy needed to melt steel.
 
Captain_Swoop said:
two lies gravitational energy was very much smaller than the energy needed to melt steel.
Click to expand...

No, that's still a lie. It may not have melted very much steel, but it was certainly sufficient energy to melt some steel. Since the truthers have no idea how much molten steel they're pretending there was at Ground Zero...

Dave
 
Tony Szamboti, a member of AE911 Truth who is an accomplished mechanical engineer with an emphasis on the structural behavior of materials, has detailed the strength of construction of WTC Building Seven. Szamboti noted that the strength of construction was “five times stronger than it needed to be, yet this building fell at free-fall acceleration on 9/11.” Furthermore, Szamboti has demonstrated clearly that a free-fall acceleration is, as he says, “physically impossible without the use of explosives” to remove the thousands of tons of structural framework beneath the skin of the building.

http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/44-press-items/507-zuzu.html
 
walkyrie said:
, “physically impossible without the use of explosives” to remove the thousands of tons of structural framework beneath the skin of the building.
Click to expand...
Of course, he's forgetting that it's physically impossible to detonate said explosives without there being an ear shattering BOOM. I guess that's a minor detail in twoofer world. Before you write it, superdupersekritnanothermatimate is not an explosive.
 
walkyrie said:
This discovery proves without question that highly sophisticated demolition explosives charges had been placed in the Twin Towers and Building 7 before the two planes struck them on 9/11

9/11: Enhanced WTC1 Video (NIST FOIA - CBS-Net Dub6 04)


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OfVMOIUBnso&



.
Click to expand...
Except for that pesky little thing called an explosive sound that nobody in the twoof movement has been able to explain away with anything that exists in reality.
 
walkyrie said:
This discovery proves without question that highly sophisticated demolition explosives charges had been placed in the Twin Towers and Building 7 before the two planes struck them on 9/11

9/11: Enhanced WTC1 Video (NIST FOIA - CBS-Net Dub6 04)


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OfVMOIUBnso&



.
Click to expand...

facepalm23.jpg
 
walkyrie said:
Tony Szamboti, a member of AE911 Truth who is an accomplished mechanical engineer with an emphasis on the structural behavior of materials, ...
Click to expand...

How do you measure "accomplished", and what's your evidence that Toni is "accomplished"?

Szamboti is not a licensed professional engineer (P.E.) in any state of the Union. This may not be very important for mechanical engineers (I frankly don't know), but doesn't speak for him either.



walkyrie said:
...the strength of construction was “five times stronger than it needed to be...
Click to expand...
This is a nonsensical statement. There is no such factor that could be reasonably given for the entire building. Even if there were, the moment you take out some structural element, as happened when WTC1 crashed into 7, all such design considerations are off. Once fire breaks out, and rages uncontrolledly for over 7 hours and throughout at least 14 floors, probably more, all such factors are off.
That you would write such nonsense proves once again that you have close to zero understanding of the things you talk about here.
Does it bother you that your imcompetence is clearly visible for most posters here every single time you post?
 
walkyrie said:
Minister Louis Farrakhan Exposes 9/11 Controlled Demolitions and Questions the Official Theory of 9/11 (Part 2)



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3mYJSOzkuqc&NR=1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6FmbqUkfiZE&feature=related

.
Click to expand...
Insane claims, made by a lair. Cool, you found another person who makes up lies, and fools idiots into believing lies. Good find of nonsense on 911 issues. Farrakhan mentions the PUT options, makes him an idiot on 911. The PUT options alone prove Farrakhan is a liar. Good find! Keep up the good work proving this guy failed to get anything right on 911.
 
Ok, quoting Tony Szamboti is silly, but Louis Farrakhan? Are there any anti-semites he missed?
 
Sabretooth said:
Wow. Three lies in a single sentence. Not even worth clicking the link.
Click to expand...

Since many witnesses testified to molten steel, it's hardly a lie. You may not agree with the reliability of the witnesses, but calling it a lie is just childish.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom