• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged General Holocaust denial discussion thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
So the record shows you don't believe large numbers of people were buried at Treblinka and you will keep ducking the question.

Fair enough.

Not fair enough, the record shows you asked me the narrative of Treblinka. I gave it. You have decided that my not mentioning a number is important, no one else

Indeed, since Polish newspapers based in London announced people were being murdered in Treblinka II 2 weeks before it opened, it is really quite normal for Holocuast Historiography

Ohhh my god - how did I not see it - someone wrote 12 instead of 22nd. That automatically invalidates 40,000 other pieces of evidence and a few million people

I quite understand if you don't wish to - I am under no illusion that you actually believe these fairytales.

I have no issue with the numbers quoted at Treblinka because I know a smaller site that has 6 million people buried in it. They are still there, you can see them any time. But that wont interest you - its called evidence
 
Not fair enough, the record shows you asked me the narrative of Treblinka. I gave it. You have decided that my not mentioning a number is important, no one else



Ohhh my god - how did I not see it - someone wrote 12 instead of 22nd. That automatically invalidates 40,000 other pieces of evidence and a few million people

No it was a news conference on the 9th of July 1942 and the polish newspaper it appeared it was dated the 11th of July. what I quoted was a German translation of the Polish original.

It is a fact that the Government in Exile was giving press conferences saying people were being murdered by gas in "Tremblinka" before Treblinka II had actually opened.

I have no issue with the numbers quoted at Treblinka because I know a smaller site that has 6 million people buried in it. They are still there, you can see them any time. But that wont interest you - its called evidence
Well the catacombs of Paris is hardly an apt comparision, as they were the result of digging up cemetaries and stacking bones from bodies which had already decomposed.

I have never doubted that it would by physically possible to store 800 000 bodies in a very small area if you did down enough metres.

However, I am still hoping that you will give an approximation of
a. how many people you think were buried
b. any dimensions of these mass graves - if you believe it is possible to determine such information with any accuracy
 
(47) again:
World Almanac, 1933, pg. 419 -- 15,316,359,
World Almanac USA, 1947, pg. 748: World Jewish Population -- 15,690,000

The figures speak for themselves.
No, numbers don't speak for themselves.

That's why such world population estimates were originally printed in a table with an introduction and footnotes in the World Almanac. On the actual pages for each year the source is given for the estimates. Why don't you provide that additional information from the actual pages*?

[*A lot of Holocaust denial sites list the wrong pages.]

Not only are these figures identified as estimates but in the 1947 edition they are still clearly identified as pre-war estimates because no new data was available while the genocide was in progress - or in fact for some time after the end of the 12 year reich.

The American Jewish Committee is an organization the World Almanac identified as its source for Jewish population estimates. This organization not only provided numbers to the publishers of the World Almanac, the AJC also published a yearbook themselves.

Below is a disclaimers that was printed in the 1941/1942 edition of the AJC Yearbook:
"The statistics of Jewish population of various countries of the world given in the preceding volume were compiled at a time when it was still possible to secure more or less reliable figures for most countries. The spread of Nazi-Germany domination and the interruption of communications resulting from the present war have made it impossible to secure information on the basis of which figures given last year can be revised"

The World Almanac didn't print information from 1940 however. It identified an even earlier year for the last available date in its volumes printed during the war. Can you tell the lurkers which year the World Almanac referenced in its war time volumes and in the immediate aftermath of the Holocaust? In most of the World Almanac volumes from the 1940s it says something like "Compilations from latest available data, 1938, by the American Jewish Committee ... " in the text printed with the tables. Doesn't it?

American Jewish Committee , Yearbook 1945-1946, Statistics of Jews:
1. Accurate statistics on the surviving Jews in Europe are not yet available. Before the war, there were approximately nine and three-quarter million Jews on that continent. Estimates as to the number who have perished in the Nazi gas chambers and concentration camps and through disease and starvation vary, but the consensus seems to be that about half of that figure have been victims of nazism.

2. Because of the highly tentative nature of the estimated figures the table of statistics on Jews in European countries , "a regular feature in pre-war volumes of the American Jewish Year Book, is not included in the present volume. For the convenience however, of those who wish to refer to census figures and estimates dating prior to 1939, two summary tables are published, as usual, containing pre-war Jewish population statistics for the countries and important cities around the world.

American Jewish Committee, Yearbook 1946-1947
"The figures reveal that the total Jewish population of the world has decreased by one-third, from about 16.600.000 in 1939 to about 11,000,000 in 1946, as a result of the annihilation by the Nazis of more than five and a half million European Jews. In Europe only an estimated 3,642,000 remain of the total Jewish pre-war population of approximately 9,740,000"

http://www.ajcarchives.org/main.php?GroupingId=40
 
Of which you might provide a link too?

I have bunny on deep ignore now, but the exchange makes it pretty clear he's discussing a denier forgery concocted by Udo Walendy, who altered an edition of Polish exile newspaper Dziennik Polski rather blatantly.

The forgery appears in Historische Tatsachen Nr 44 on p.2, which can be downloaded here (warning: large PDF file).

I'm sure skeptics will enjoy this flashback to pre-Photoshop image manipulation.
 
And you know how?
Ah yes, only very few surviving witnesses actually saw the gaschambers and the killing process. And a handful of witnesses is never enough to base historic fact on.
On the other hand, according to the story , none should have survived...

It is a conundrum.
Millions survived but only a few, three to five, actually saw the gaschambers and the killing process.
 
Nick likes to stick his head in the ignore sand when the Holocaust lies become too obvious.

He slipped out a side door when LemmyCaution told us that Jewish men performed the labor required to kill 3,000,000 Jewish children, women, and men in gas chambers.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7136862&postcount=1588


I wonder if he heard that the Auschwitz tattoo of Elie Wiesel, Holocaust standard bearer, has gone missing?
 
It is a conundrum.
Millions survived but only a few, three to five, actually saw the gaschambers and the killing process.
Which -even if it were true- would still be three to five more than those who described the Aktion Reinhardt camps as transit camps.

Go away for a while, PM Dogzilla and Saggy coordinate your research. and then come back to give a decent response to this polite request:
Please summarize the evidence for the AR camps being death camps.

Please summarize the evidence for the AR camps being delousing/transit camps.

Evidence can include, of course, physical remains and other physical traces but is not restricted to this sort of evidence.

We can then see if anyone can add to either of your summaries and finally we can compare the two summaries, doing away with the rest of your obfuscatory rhetoric.

LemmyCaution has generously considered that you might miss something. See he specifically reiterates that here:
So come on, summarize the evidence for Treblinka (and Belzec and Sobibor) being extermination camps. Summarize the evidence that they were merely delousing/transit waystations. Let others fill in what you've missed. Compare the two summaries.
But he probably won't agree that the comments on the two pages since his request are the best even you -collectively- could have come up with. Is this really the best you can do?

What do you -collectively- offer here?
"Not one of your comments, not one paragraph, not one sentence in any of them, can be taken on trust as an accurate representation of its historical subject. All of them are completely worthless as history, because Holocaust deniers cannot be trusted anywhere, in any of them, to give a reliable account of what they are talking or writing about. It may seem an absurd semantic dispute to deny the appellation of ''revisionist' to someone who has written thousands of comments or more about historical subjects. But if we mean by 'revisionist' someone who is concerned to discover the truth about the past, and to give as accurate a representation of it as possible, then none of you can even be considered 'revisionists'. Those in the know, indeed, are accustomed to avoid the term altogether when referring to you, preferring call you Holocaust deniers. You're all essentially ideologues who uses history for your own political purposes; not primarily concerned with discovering and interpreting what happened in the past, you're concerned merely to give a selective and tendentious account of it in order to further your own ideological ends in the present."

That was me taking some liberties with Richard Evans' observations found at another valuable depository of evidence linked here:
HDOT 6.21 http://www.holocaustdenialontrial.org/en/trial/defense/evans/6

You could perhaps move Holocaust denial into unknown territory if you just abandoned the recycling of stale canards that without exception pre-date that trial. Have you seen when some of your comments were first made by the Holocaust deniers whose thoughts you borrow with scant attribution? Have you seen how their thoughts have -barely if at all- influenced the history books? How successful have these canards been in persuading people to become Holocaust deniers themselves?

Can you contradict the summary Nick Terry gave recently in another JREF thread about the lack of success of Holocaust denial in the decades since, to use your own most recent recycled example, the first attempt was made to float the World Almanac figures?

Three to five? That's about the number of Holocaust deniers active in this thread at any moment in time. What is the actual number, really?
 
I have bunny on deep ignore now, but the exchange makes it pretty clear he's discussing a denier forgery concocted by Udo Walendy, who altered an edition of Polish exile newspaper Dziennik Polski rather blatantly.

The forgery appears in Historische Tatsachen Nr 44 on p.2, which can be downloaded here (warning: large PDF file).

I'm sure skeptics will enjoy this flashback to pre-Photoshop image manipulation.

The reproduction of the newspaper has been altered - but the sole reason that otherwise the text is illegible.

walendyo.tif


There is no reason to doubt the reference - if Dr Terry seriously thought it was a forgery [which I have excellent reason to believe he does not] - all he needs to do is find the original - which since the newspaper is still being published should not be so hard.

In fact, I have found other references to "Tremblinka" as an extermination camp pre-July 1942, so I have no doubt that the reproduction is authentic and altered for the sole reason to allow readers to read the text.
 
I don't know that they have been correctly reference, but I find it extra-ordinary the Czech would invent a "Durchgangslager Malkinia"

She gives references
APMO, D-AuI-5/4, Registro
dell’obitorio, p. 44;
Mat. RO., vol. VI, f. 26 A
and
APMO, Mat. RO., vol. VI,
f. 26 C


In anycase it is an official publication of the Auschwitz Museum, it would be certainly interesting to know the documentary basis of these exact registration numbers - but I for one don't doubt they are correct.

Perhaps you could ask the Auschwitz museum yourself? My questions never get answered.
Where did I suggest that Danuta Czech invented anything?

I merely noted that, on the basis of what you, who are trying to use a transport reported from Malkinia southwest to Auschwitz as a prop in a "thesis" about the existence of a transit camp at Treblinka to help move Jews east to the Soviet Union, your reference 1) doesn't help your case and 2) doesn't on its face allow for many answers.

Since you raised the document, which you say is not in your possession, I am trying to make clear to you that others, who have not seen it but have seen you lie and twist about other such documents, cannot answer the question what the document means before they too see it. Which is rather elementary. Unlike Fritz Berg, I will not hold my breath waiting for you to be forthcoming on this.
 
Because it refers to - in the German edition - Durchgangslager Malkinia. In the Italian edition which I have it is "campo di transito di Małkinia."

So it is not a transport from Malkinia, it is a transport from Durchgangslager (aka transit camp) Malkinia.

The question I am posing to you is, is this transit camp the same which the Warsaw Jews were sent to or the Greek Jews not selected at Auschwitz? If it wasn't, what was the role of this transit camp?
 
Because it refers to - in the German edition - Durchgangslager Malkinia. In the Italian edition which I have it is "campo di transito di Małkinia."

So it is not a transport from Malkinia, it is a transport from Durchgangslager (aka transit camp) Malkinia.

The question I am posing to you is, is this transit camp the same which the Warsaw Jews were sent to or the Greek Jews not selected at Auschwitz? If it wasn't, what was the role of this transit camp?
The answer I am giving you--and I recall of course that you rely upon the Italian edition--is that until you summarize the document, or better yet I see it, I won't have an opinion. And I am adding that I will not, and warn others not to, rely on anything you claim about a document without your showing your hand. I've said this a couple times now, so, by all means keep asking me what my interpretation is of a document I haven't seen, but realize that my answer will not change until I see it.
 
Last edited:
Nick likes to stick his head in the ignore sand when the Holocaust lies become too obvious.

He slipped out a side door when LemmyCaution told us that Jewish men performed the labor required to kill 3,000,000 Jewish children, women, and men in gas chambers.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7136862&postcount=1588


I wonder if he heard that the Auschwitz tattoo of Elie Wiesel, Holocaust standard bearer, has gone missing?
Clayton Moore, in his haste to plead for Nick Terry to notice him, seems to have forgotten some posts which I made:

Another lie.

Where does Clayton Moore get that I believe there were less than 1000 members of even the Jewish police?

The order service in Warsaw alone IIRC had over 2000 members, and Lodz's was over 1000. There were more than 2000 ghettos, and, while not all of them had Jewish police, the larger ones had such police forces. Ghettos with Jewish police forces included Lvov, Cracow, Radom, Czestochowa, Kovno, Shavli, Bialystok, Lublin, Pabianice, Luck, Slonim, Kielce, and so on. I don't know the total number of Jewish policemen in the various ghettos and have not ever posted an estimate of the number.

The Jewish police forces were ordered into existence by the Germans, and not all played a role in roundups and deportations. Jewish police forces were to keep order in the ghetto, apprehend and punish lawbreakers, help in forming labor columns, help in tax collections, prevent smuggling, assist in guarding ghetto gates, etc.

Members of the police forces were often drawn from professional and somewhat privileged backgrounds, but in places (Lodz, Nowy Dwor, Chelm) and at times, recruits also included people with criminal pasts. There are many accounts of corruption and abuse of power on the part of some members of the police forces. In addition, many policemen tried using their membership on the forces to save themselves and their families from deportation.

Under duress from the Germans, many in the Jewish Councils and Jewish police believed that compliance with German orders, even extreme orders, could save the lives of Jewish ghetto inmates; that said, the role played by these groups is one of the most contested areas of Holocaust scholarship. While the Vilna police, under Jacob Gens, was one of the most active in anti-Jewish actions, assisting with the Germans in the massacre of Oshmiana, for example, Gens also sometimes assisted the FPO, as the main Jewish underground organization in Vilna was called, and a high leader, Josef Glazman (deputy commissioner), doubled as a top leader of the underground. Many other Jewish policemen similarly did the Germans' bidding whilst trying to mitigate or assist ghetto Jews. As is so often the case in life, the record of the Jewish police is a mixed bag full of shades of grey.

Taking just Clayton Moore's first lie, that I somewhere estimated no more than 1000 Jewish laborers involved in deportation and at killing sites, in the case of the Jewish police alone there were far more than 1000, but, of course, whilst many police forces were forced to assist in roundups, their general duties were quite different to this. I don't know precisely how many of the 1000s of Jewish policemen at some point in their duty assisted in roundups, for example.

Frankly, I also do not know the total number of Jewish policemen (many 1000s?), members of Jewish Councils, men forced into death camp SK's or to serve as ramp or barracks laborers (a few 1000s total for the death camps?), Jewish camp kapos (probably in the 100s), or Jewish men forced to dig pits into which Jewish shooting victims could be buried. 1000 is not a good estimate, its being far too low.

I did not post or imply what is claimed--that the killings in the death camps were done by Jews and that about 1000 Jews did the labor for the mass murder. I never made an estimate of how many Jews were "enlisted" by the Germans and supervised by them and their allies to perform various forms of labor building camps, digging pits, cleaning train cars, processing stolen goods, cutting hair, or cleaning out gas chambers and disposing of bodies. Since Clayton Moore claims otherwise, he needs to show where in this thread or anywhere else (I also post at Rodoh, where my username is KentFord9) I claimed that about 1000 Jews were forced by the Germans to do various forms of labor involving the deportations and killings.

Why did Clayton Moore misrepresent what I have already concerning this subject?

In addition to his lack of eagerness to address his misrepresentation, Clayton Moore is very quiet about the men who designed the killing process and technology for high-volume, had the installations constructed and did the engineering work on them, recruited/impressed laborers for various roles in the process (including those non-Jews who caused the lethal gas to be introduced into gas chambers and vans), managed the killing process, provided oversight and ordered repairs and improvements when necessary, provided security for the operations, supplied training and weapons to the supervisors of the killing, punished uncooperative laborers and victims alike, selected and rounded up victims for deportation, coordinated with rail and other authorities for transportation of the victims, organized and managed the transports of victims to the killing sites, and in several cases caused the evidence of mass murder to be destroyed and "cleaned up."
And he also is ignoring The Red Worm's answer to my question why Clayton Moore misrepresents what is posted:

Because he is only here to troll?
 
The reproduction of the newspaper has been altered - but the sole reason that otherwise the text is illegible.

[qimg]http://img268.imageshack.us/img268/4581/walendyo.tif[/qimg]

There is no reason to doubt the reference - if Dr Terry seriously thought it was a forgery [which I have excellent reason to believe he does not] - all he needs to do is find the original - which since the newspaper is still being published should not be so hard.

In fact, I have found other references to "Tremblinka" as an extermination camp pre-July 1942, so I have no doubt that the reproduction is authentic and altered for the sole reason to allow readers to read the text.
This is too funny, such a kidder is our bunny.

Since he introduced this document, and excuses the obvious tampering, why doesn't bunny find for us the original document to clear up what appears to be his passing around a counterfeit?

And while he is at it, bunny might also 1) tote up the evidence for Treblinka as a death camp and 2) Treblinka as a hygienic waystation. Also, knowing bunny's methods, we should not take his word about his having "found other references" but should insist that he give citations in which manner we do not end up falling for his mendacity and self-serving interpretations.

But the real point here is the hilarity of bunny's post--he claims fraud where there is no sign of it, over and over, yet, when tampering is blatant, he waves it away and relies upon what he says he does not doubt. LOL
 
The answer I am giving you--and I recall of course that you rely upon the Italian edition--is that until you summarize the document, or better yet I see it, I won't have an opinion. And I am adding that I will not, and warn others not to, rely on anything you claim about a document without your showing your hand. I've said this a couple times now, so, by all means keep asking me what my interpretation is of a document I haven't seen, but realize that my answer will not change until I see it.

Bunny is misreading the Kalendarium, surprise surprise; and he's also pig-ignorant of the source base. His babbling about the morgue registry and materials of the resistance movement relates to other entries about events in the camp recorded in the Kalendarium on the same day, not to the entries for transports.

The entry on December 10 1942 which says 'Malkinia' has no source referencing in the margin column. The next entry states that among the prisoners registered from the transport was Salmen Lewental, whose manuscript does mention his transport from the Zichenau district stopping at Malkinia rail junction causing the deportees to worry about being sent to Treblinka which was on a branch route from Malkinia, but this was not an everybody-get-off stop, just a traffic stop. Nobody got off the train whether to stretch their legs or be 'transited' anywhere. Thus Czech misread Lewental.

The underlying source for all registrations, the Smolen list, doesn't mention Malkinia at all, anywhere. Nor does any other document relating to a transport to Auschwitz. Nor any witness. To the contrary: there are sufficient survivors of the transports from the Zichenau district that the 'Malkinia' entries in the Kalendarium can be dismissed as a misinterpretation by Danuta Czech.
 
Last edited:
Bunny is misreading the Kalendarium, surprise surprise; and he's also pig-ignorant of the source base. His babbling about the morgue registry and materials of the resistance movement relates to other entries about events in the camp recorded in the Kalendarium on the same day, not to the entries for transports.

The entry on December 10 1942 which says 'Malkinia' has no source referencing in the margin column. The next entry states that among the prisoners registered from the transport was Salmen Lewental, whose manuscript does mention his transport from the Zichenau district stopping at Malkinia rail junction causing the deportees to worry about being sent to Treblinka which was on a branch route from Malkinia, but this was not an everybody-get-off stop, just a traffic stop. Nobody got off the train whether to stretch their legs or be 'transited' anywhere. Thus Czech misread Lewental.

The underlying source for all registrations, the Smolen list, doesn't mention Malkinia at all, anywhere. Nor does any other document relating to a transport to Auschwitz. Nor any witness. To the contrary: there are sufficient survivors of the transports from the Zichenau district that the 'Malkinia' entries in the Kalendarium can be dismissed as a misinterpretation by Danuta Czech.

But you are saying Danuta Czech was using the buried diary as her source, but we know that can't be true - and Dr Terry knows this too and is deliberately lying again - because not only does the diary not mention a transit camp....it doesnt mention Malkinia at all.

And the diary has nothing to say about transports on 12 December.

Nice try, Dr Terry
 
But you are saying Danuta Czech was using the buried diary as her source, but we know that can't be true - and Dr Terry knows this too and is deliberately lying again - because not only does the diary not mention a transit camp....it doesnt mention Malkinia at all.

And the diary has nothing to say about transports on 12 December.

Nice try, Dr Terry

Actually I was wrong - or at least not wrong about 12 of December - but wrong about the Lewenthal Diary.

I was thinking of the Gradowski Diary (it was a veritable library around Krema II...)
Goodbye, Jews in pialystok. May the factories [save]
you from foes. [...] Remain in peace and security and may we in
future return here as free men.
The train accelerated its motion. Everyone plunged again into
an atmosphere of absolute despondency. The sadness grew with
every kilometre and with every kilometre the emptiness became
greater. What happened? Here we are approaching the ill-famed
station of Treblinka, so tragic for the Jews, where, according to
information which had filtered through to us, the majority of Poles
and Jews from abroad 9 were swallowed up and wiped out. Everyone
is looking through the small windows and is searching for
something in silence. They will, maybe, notice something, find
some sign which would tell them the truth. Somebody, perhaps,
would stand in the road and would tell them whither they are
being led and what is awaiting them. Oh, how horrible!

The Lewenthal Diary has this
[...] it is true [...] he heard that they are leading [...] in this way
also [Warsaw?] [Jews] were led [...] from the whole [neighbourhood].
From our neighbourhood were sent to known [camps] [...] unfit,
what was [our?] [...] straight into the jaws of death [...] they found
themselves in [the transport?] innocent [...] people who [...] we
really did not know [a thing?] we did not know about Auschwitz
all about [...] labour camp [...] conditions [...] but [...] [about] the
camp we meanwhile got to know [...] various [people] just [from
the camp], people who had been there for whole months, 5 this
[misled?] us all [...] till the last moment in the end [...] they were
frightened [...] station Malkinia 6 which [...] no [transport?] was
brought [...] [at night?] they passed [...] [as far as] the station
Malkinia, where the train stopped [.]
[7]
1...] they were dishonoured [...] with knives [...] naked girls [...] in
a dreadful manner [...] clubs were inserted into the lower part
of their bodies until [...] they died in terrible pain and suffering
[...] older people [...] the sadists dragged forth [...] forced them to
rape [...] children [...] also [they?] [...] were taken [...] and wives
from their families 7 [...]
[81

I am not sure who edited these diaries, I think it was Ber Marks (who apparantly was pinged for forging some childrens diaries from the Warsaw ghetto).

Marks, if it was he, includes a footnote
6 At Malkinia (Warsaw province) there was a transit camp for Jews.
Transport which were directed to be exterminated at Auschwitz, Majdanek
and Treblinka II were formed in this camp. Compare p. 31, Note I.

So Danuta Czeck and Ber Marks seem to think there was a transit camp at Malkinia.
 
Just in case anyone doubts the Ber Marks diary falsification they are welcome to check these references out.

Significantly, Pierre Guillaume writes in his Law and History (p. 114) that Mark was “accused of having manufactured false journals of children of the Warsaw ghetto.” As source Guillaume gives a French journal of historiography, Revue d’histoire de la Seconde guerre mondiale, January 1962.
 
little grey rabbit said:
The auschwitz museum has two documents stating some thousands of Jews were transferred to Auschwitz from "Durchgangslager Malkina"

Well these documents are obviously faked.

You know like the one about the capacity of the five (!) crematories in Auschwitz and all the other documents mentioning any crematory of Auschwitz.

If you do not see the sacrasm in my comment, then maybe I should be clearer:

Nice way of showing us your double standards. Every document, picture, testimony or whatever, that goes against your fantasy is of course faked, but if there are documents in existence which seem to be evidence for your side, then those are true. Brilliant!

So you are either a troll or/and a total nutjob. I for myself can't deside if you're just a troll or both.

But to your point:

1. Since you already misinterpreted a testimony in order to claim, that the, for your position annoying, Himmler Posen speech is a fake, I want to read this document for myself.
2. I never heard of Malkinia being the same as Treblinka (I haven't really researched much into the Aktion Reinhard camps), but according to a quick google(-Earth) search Malkina is about 4 km away from the postion of the Treblinka camp. So the question would be, why weren't they exterminated at Treblinka instead of at Auschwitz. But this isn't really something, that speaks against the fact, that Treblinka was an extermination camp.

little grey rabbit said:
So there are more documents that refer to Treblinka as a Transit Camp than there are verified mass graves

1. Malkinia isn't Treblinka.
2. The mass graves were emptied, which again is proven by the convergence of eyewitness testimony, perpetrator terstimony and that report you deniers like to ignore. There was ash everywhere and you are still ignoring this.

little grey rabbit said:
So Danuta Czeck and Ber Marks seem to think there was a transit camp at Malkinia.

That would have been also my thought, since there is a way of 4 km between them.
 
Last edited:
2. I never heard of Malkinia being the same as Treblinka (I haven't really researched much into the Aktion Reinhard camps), but according to a quick google(-Earth) search Malkina is about 4 km away from the postion of the Treblinka camp. So the question would be, why weren't they exterminated at Treblinka instead of at Auschwitz. But this isn't really something, that speaks against the fact, that Treblinka was an extermination camp.

Yes but since we know the Polish Government in Exile was giving press conferences about mass murder with gas in "Tremblinka" on 9 July 1942, before it was supposed to have been opened, the thought arises that perhaps Durchgangslager Malkinia and Treblinka are one and the same.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom