Merged Continuation - 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
NoahFence said:
It takes very little effort and even less reading skills to find out Silverstein LOST money on 9/11.
Click to expand...
"Silverstein's lease with the Port Authority for the World Trade Center requires him to continue paying $102 million annually in base rent.[28] He is applying insurance payments toward the redevelopment of the World Trade Center site.[23]
.....
In April 2006, after several months of negotiation aimed toward permitting reconstruction to commence, Silverstein yielded some of his rights back to the Port Authority, in order to facilitate rebuilding at the site. Those negotiations resulted in Silverstein ceding his rights to building One
.....
Ground was broken on the construction of 1 World Trade Center on April 27, 2006.[29] Lack of financing had prevented construction from commencing earlier. The proceeds of the insurance policies arising from the destruction of the previous buildings were insufficient to cover the cost of rebuilding all the insured buildings.

" ...terms of the lease gave Silverstein, as leaseholder, the right and the obligation to rebuild the structures if destroyed.[16]"
" Wiki
 
BasqueArch said:
"Silverstein's lease with the Port Authority for the World Trade Center requires him to continue paying $102 million annually in base rent.[28] He is applying insurance payments toward the redevelopment of the World Trade Center site.[23]
.....
In April 2006, after several months of negotiation aimed toward permitting reconstruction to commence, Silverstein yielded some of his rights back to the Port Authority, in order to facilitate rebuilding at the site. Those negotiations resulted in Silverstein ceding his rights to building One
.....
Ground was broken on the construction of 1 World Trade Center on April 27, 2006.[29] Lack of financing had prevented construction from commencing earlier. The proceeds of the insurance policies arising from the destruction of the previous buildings were insufficient to cover the cost of rebuilding all the insured buildings.

" ...terms of the lease gave Silverstein, as leaseholder, the right and the obligation to rebuild the structures if destroyed.[16]"
" Wiki
Click to expand...

What am I supposed to be reading into that highlighted part?
 
atecom said:
So let me get this straight... The new World order paid Mr. Roberts to pretend he was a NY tour guide, so that he could appear to be an Authority to talk about building collapses?

Trying to understand Prison planet is tiring me out. All I know is that if some of the truthers there get their way, the world will become Alex Jones' Prison Planet.
Click to expand...

I'm surprised nobody has blamed 9/11 on a rogue member of the Q continuum
 
RedIbis said:
A 9 year old article that could not have forseen future agreements and judgements.
Click to expand...

Actually, you're pretty far from being right. Not a huge surprise.

Silverstein took control of the site less than 2 months before 9/11. If we're to believe the asinine truther version that he did it to make money, he got on the ball pretty quickly.
 
NoahFence said:
Actually, you're pretty far from being right. Not a huge surprise.

Silverstein took control of the site less than 2 months before 9/11. If we're to believe the asinine truther version that he did it to make money, he got on the ball pretty quickly.
Click to expand...

So you think that Silverstein currently has the obligation to rebuild the structures, on his dime?
 
RedIbis said:
So you think that Silverstein currently has the obligation to rebuild the structures, on his dime?
Click to expand...

Did I say that?

Did I even hint that I might at some point in the future, say that?

The question, if you'd care to read, was "did silverstein make money off of 9/11" - he did not. Period.


Not only that, but he would have had to plan this, get all the material to blow the towers, get the people to do it, pay off emergency personnel, alert the BBC, get people to fly airplanes into the buildings, and a whole host of other crap in less than 2 months. Do you think it's possible?
 
Last edited:
RedIbis said:
So you think that Silverstein currently has the obligation to rebuild the structures, on his dime?
Click to expand...
Did we miss where you showed he "made out like a bandit"?

Can you reference how much of the WTC towers insurance he actually collected before being "off the hook" for the rebuilding? Are you claiming the insurance companies paid him for rebuilding what he now is not responsible?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom