Professional Mechanical Engineer Tony Szamboti mentioned in his speech at the University of Hartford that NIST's experiment set the simulation so that WTC 7's steel thermal conductivity was zero. That means it did not dissipate any heat, as normal steel would, thus creating an artificially high temperature of steel.
http://911blogger.com/news/2011-04-...why-nist-report-non-explanatory-tony-szamboti
He also said:
"Each floor of the WTC 7 was the size of a football field." (about 100 yards wide)
"Nobody does a failure analysis by not saving physical evidence. Nobody." (Steel evidence was removed))
"The destruction of evidence warrants an investigation in and of itself." (tampering with a Federal crime scene.)
"There were sheer studs on the girders" (reinforcements that the NIST computer model did not have)
"NIST's model did not allow for heat dissipation through the steel" (NIST said steel thermal conductivity was zero, unrealistic)
"Concrete has the same differential coefficient of expansion as steel" (NIST model did not, which tears concrete from steel)
"The vertical load capacity of a beam when it has a slight local buckling is generally not upset." (it still can support a floor)
"They didn't test this" (NIST did no experiments with physical steel, just computer models)
The beams had 6 times the strength needed to resist buckling.
"NIST is telling us that the entire interior collapsed before the exterior...ludicrous"
"The NIST report is unfortunately, thoroughly bogus."
"Fires could not have caused the collapse of this enormous building."
If we don't expose the criminals of 9/11, they may go on and commit other crimes.
