Java, it's already too late to save your credibility. I wager you have none at this point. However, it is worth pointing out that you are not only dismissing the most obvious explanations for sources of heat,sulphur, ie. conditions which are the most likely to have produced this corrosion, and were known to be present, but you are putting forward an alternative idea for which there is no direct evidence at all!
1) You have not shown any evidence that therm*te can produce eutectic erosion of steel. In order for your claim to have any credibility you'd need to present this - but you've of course failed to do so.
2) You haven't shown any evidence that therm*te was brought to the WTC complex, that it was installed or attached to any steel (there is no evidence at all!).
3) You haven't shown any evidence that therm*te could somehow survive for weeks in the debris piles, remaining concentrated enough to activate, ie without being scattered or dissipated by the violence of the collapses just like everything else which was ground to dust.
4) you haven't shown any evidence of the remnants of therm*te in the debris collected and sorted at Freshkills or elsewhere, nor any evidence of melted steel beams. btw, evidence of melted beams is pretty much required if your therm*te theory has any hope of being true. But of course you've failed in that regard as well.
I can't imagine a more thorough failure to produce evidence than you've demonstrated in this thread. I think you've reached a new record in fallacious claims backed up with zero evidence - I suppose some kind of congratulations are in order!
