dafydd
Banned
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2008
- Messages
- 35,398
Bulltweety. Provide a citation for that claim. Not even uber-truthers Szamboti or Chandler agree with it!
You just makin' stuff up now?
Troll is as troll does.
Bulltweety. Provide a citation for that claim. Not even uber-truthers Szamboti or Chandler agree with it!
You just makin' stuff up now?
Originally Posted by Clayton Moore
The core columns were huge, more huge, and much more huge yet they offered little resistance, about 4 or 5 seconds over free projected fall speed
The core columns were huge, more huge, and much more huge yet they offered little resistance,
Speed is not measured in seconds and the units of 'free fall' are not those of 'speed'.about 4 or 5 seconds over free projected fall speed,
30 foot sections of steel columns and gravel to fist sized chunks of concrete to do add up to 'pulverization'. Now if you wish to speak of what occured to a gajillion square feet of drywall or other soft materials.............to the alleged "collapse" to pulverization.
Where did Java Man go?
He was actively participating in this thread, now he's nowhere to be found.
Probably brushing up on his knowledge of chemistry or maybe he's finally writing up that theory he promised us last September.
Yeah, that's probably what he's doing.![]()
Where did Java Man go?
He was actively participating in this thread, now he's nowhere to be found.
Probably brushing up on his knowledge of chemistry or maybe he's finally writing up that theory he promised us last September.
Yeah, that's probably what he's doing.![]()
are you that ignorant? the core was the last to collapse. You can see such in many videos with spires still standing moments after the perimeter was gone.The core columns were huge, more huge, and much more huge yet they offered little resistance, about 4 or 5 seconds over free projected fall speed, to the alleged "collapse" to pulverization.
Feigning disinterest says you're beat and you know it.