Merged Continuation - 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
ergo said:
What post and why should I care?
Click to expand...

You do realize that the underlined words, are in fact a link, right?



Here is YOUR post.

ergo said:
:boggled:
If you read the testimonies the explosions reported by ff's were heard by ff's inside the buildings that were already being evacuated or they were heard outside, either preceding or during the collapses. So your focus on a bomb squad protocol here, when they would already be on site and obviously in communication with rescue personnel, is a red herring.
Click to expand...




Here is MINE, addressing YOUR post on this matter.

triforcharity said:
I am currently listening to the fourth section of audio from the FDNY Manhattan dispatch.
(Found here and at 10:00 Brooklyn dispatch comes on and advises that the PD has a report of a bomb in the Brooklyn Battery Tunnel. What is the first thing he says?

Stay the **** out.

Imagine that.
Click to expand...

I've made it as simple as possible for you. I've posted YOUR post, when YOU brought up the FF Oral Histories, so you would understand WHY I would like you to address the post. It's YOUR claim, and I have shown you that if someone thought there were BOMBS around, they would have warned other firefighters to STAY THE **** OUT!!

Now, I cannot make it any more simple as I have.

Care to address it now? Or are you going to continue avoiding it? I know, it hurts your fantasies, but do try your best to work though it.
 
triforcharity said:
I've made it as simple as possible for you. I've posted YOUR post, when YOU brought up the FF Oral Histories, so you would understand WHY I would like you to address the post. It's YOUR claim, and I have shown you that if someone thought there were BOMBS around, they would have warned other firefighters to STAY THE **** OUT!!
Click to expand...

Um, some of them did.

Am I missing something here? :boggled:
 
ergo said:
Um, some of them did.

Am I missing something here? :boggled:
Click to expand...

Really? I seemed to have missed that in the audio transmissions. Maybe you can point it out for me?

I've listened to them from beginning to end. Where are they? Which section, and at what time?
 
Folks, there is no easy way to the problem of debunking walkyrie. The reason is that walkyrie never ever responds anything posted at him or her. Probably doesn't even read what you write.

It's best to ignore those utterings. Everybody can see they are just ideological statements informed by errors and lies concieved of several years ago.
 
It is obvious that the WTC building 7 fell at full free fall rates for a few seconds. Free fall of a mass means that no force was available to restrict the fall of this mass, and therefore in the case of the WTC buildings 7, all the columns of each subsequent floor did not restrict the fall of the mass. If it did not restrict the free fall an external energy source must have created this situation, eg, controlled demolition of each floor.
 
walkyrie said:
It is obvious that the WTC building 7 fell at full free fall rates for a few seconds. Free fall of a mass means that no force was available to restrict the fall of this mass, and therefore in the case of the WTC buildings 7, all the columns of each subsequent floor did not restrict the fall of the mass.
Click to expand...

Where's Yoda when you really need him?
 
walkyrie said:
It is obvious that the WTC building 7 fell at full free fall rates for a few seconds. Free fall of a mass means that no force was available to restrict the fall of this mass, and therefore in the case of the WTC buildings 7, all the columns of each subsequent floor did not restrict the fall of the mass.
Click to expand...

While only approximately so, congratulations! This bit is more or less true.

walkyrie said:
If it did not restrict the free fall an external energy source must have created this situation, eg, controlled demolition of each floor.
Click to expand...

Technically, of course, so is this, because of the use of the abbreviation eg, meaning "for example". There are, of course, other examples of external energy sources that could have created this situation, including the one that, according to a thorough and rigorous analysis of the collapse, actually did create this situation: a combination of thermal energy from a building contents fire and gravitational potential energy from the initial stages of the ensuing collapse, which caused a multi-storey buckle of the perimeter columns leading to near-freefall acceleration for a part of the facade collapse.

So, we're seeing a good progression here from walkyrie. From outright blatant lies to merely misleadingly incomplete statements is, I suppose, a move in the right direction. Soon he may even be able to handle reality.

Dave
 
walkyrie said:
It is obvious that the WTC building 7 fell at full free fall rates for a few seconds. Free fall of a mass means that no force was available to restrict the fall of this mass, and therefore in the case of the WTC buildings 7, all the columns of each subsequent floor did not restrict the fall of the mass. If it did not restrict the free fall an external energy source must have created this situation, eg, controlled demolition of each floor.
Click to expand...

No matter how much you wanted to hide and cover-UP the reality,the few seconds of Full free fall vertical acceleration of WTC Building Seven just mean ONE single thing, Controlled Demolition Detonations were used to Bring down this WTC building Seven
 
walkyrie said:
No matter how much you wanted to hide and cover-UP the reality,the few seconds of Full free fall vertical acceleration of WTC Building Seven just mean ONE single thing, Controlled Demolition Detonations were used to Bring down this WTC building Seven
Click to expand...
So you will be producing examples of explosive controlled demolition exhibiting free fall?
 
Walkyrie, respectfully, this thread is for the discussion of the towers, not WTC 7. Thanks.
 
walkyrie said:
It is obvious that the WTC building 7 fell at full free fall rates for a few seconds. Free fall of a mass means that no force was available to restrict the fall of this mass, and therefore in the case of the WTC buildings 7, all the columns of each subsequent floor did not restrict the fall of the mass. If it did not restrict the free fall an external energy source must have created this situation, eg, controlled demolition of each floor.
Click to expand...

Fine.
How does that fit in with the rest of the day's events?

Or was it simply a massive coincidence?
 
NoahFence said:
Fine.
How does that fit in with the rest of the day's events?

Or was it simply a massive coincidence?
Click to expand...

We have no idea what his version of the rest of the events is. No truther seems willing to provide a full theory. Why is that?
 
ladmo said:
I agree... using hijacked airliners to destroy buildings is unprecedented, the knowledge that they could be used as such were not. Having said that, all the preventive measures that were put in place, failed.
Click to expand...

Yet no one lost their job, got court-martialed, or reprimanded in any way.
 
dafydd said:
We have no idea what his version of the rest of the events is. No truther seems willing to provide a full theory. Why is that?
Click to expand...

Because as is the practice of most cults, the vast majority of them are just weak minded fools that have been turned into recruiting drones, brainwashed to repeatedly recite crap from conspiracy websites. Since they haven't been told what to say in that aspect and fed a full theory to recite, this is why they can't provide one when asked.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom