I believe it was me that used the word "Bicker", and I'm going to stand by it. It wasn't a slur, and wasn't aimed at just one side. To me the whole argument over whether someone should be allowed to wait for more evidence or not before getting off the fence, what Frank said to who, or what avatar someone used and if it was offensive, has nothing to do with the topic at hand, and certainly has nothing to do with the facts of the case.
Instead of worrying about trivial things like that, I'd rather that those that believe in guilt were willing to actually stand up for their side of the story. Since I have been asking questions those for Innocence have been great and provided a huge amount of material and answers, those for Guilt have been, for the most part, eerily silent, which makes it hard to judge if they even have anything worthy of bring to the table.
If a certain poster feels that he'd rather moan about me using the word "bicker" and feel hurt of the "slur" because of his ongoing avoiding of the case details rather than actually addressing the questions I have been raising, then so be it. I still don't have a dog in this fight, I'm trying to figure out what happened, I'd think that those who believe in Guilt would be trying to woo me as hard as the those who believe in Innocence, but instead I'm having to dredge through everything on their side by myself and just hope I can ask the right questions.